I may not be the brightest bulb in the lamp, but:
My understanding of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is that if one member is attacked, then all must respond when the treaty is invoked. If the United Kingdom declares that Iran’s attacks on its shipping to be Acts of War, then ALL of the NATO members must respond. This includes the U.S.
As a matter of reality, how long would Iran last in such a conflict? And, is this necessarily a bad thing?
Think about it. All of Iran’s terrorist activities would end and we could move all of the Palestinian “refugees” could be moved to Iran and given land to farm or otherwise work as they would.
Justplainbill's Weblog 
Iran vs NATO
I may not be the brightest bulb in the lamp, but:
My understanding of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization is that if one member is attacked, then all must respond when the treaty is invoked. If the United Kingdom declares that Iran’s attacks on its shipping to be Acts of War, then ALL of the NATO members must respond. This includes the U.S.
As a matter of reality, how long would Iran last in such a conflict? And, is this necessarily a bad thing?
Think about it. All of Iran’s terrorist activities would end and we could move all of the Palestinian “refugees” could be moved to Iran and given land to farm or otherwise work as they would.
Share this:
Related