Kakistocracy is a term for a system of government run by the worst, least qualified, most incompetent, or most unscrupulous people. It describes rule by individuals who are corrupt, inept, or morally unfit, often prioritizing personal gain over public good.EtymologyThe word comes from Ancient Greek:
- kákistos (κάκιστος) — the superlative of kakos (bad or evil), meaning “worst.”
- -kratia (κρατία) — from krátos (κράτος), meaning “rule” or “power.”
It is the direct opposite of aristocracy (rule by the best or most excellent).History and OriginThe term was first recorded in 1644 in a sermon by English clergyman Paul Gosnold, warning against descending into a “mad kind of kakistocracy” during the English Civil War. It gained wider use in the 19th century, notably by English author Thomas Love Peacock (1829), who contrasted it with aristocracy, and American poet James Russell Lowell (1876), who questioned if democracy could devolve into “a Kakistocracy… for the benefit of knaves at the cost of fools.”Modern UsageThe word saw revivals in political critique, spiking in popularity in recent years (e.g., named The Economist’s Word of the Year for 2024 amid discussions of populist governments and controversial appointments). It is often used rhetorically to criticize perceived incompetence or corruption in leadership, though no government officially identifies as one.Historical ExamplesHistorical applications include:
- Critics of the French Revolution’s Reign of Terror under Robespierre.
- Various monarchies or regimes led by notoriously unfit rulers.
current DNC is a kakistocratic conspiracy
Kakistocracy is a term for a system of government run by the worst, least qualified, most incompetent, or most unscrupulous people. It describes rule by individuals who are corrupt, inept, or morally unfit, often prioritizing personal gain over public good.EtymologyThe word comes from Ancient Greek:
It is the direct opposite of aristocracy (rule by the best or most excellent).History and OriginThe term was first recorded in 1644 in a sermon by English clergyman Paul Gosnold, warning against descending into a “mad kind of kakistocracy” during the English Civil War. It gained wider use in the 19th century, notably by English author Thomas Love Peacock (1829), who contrasted it with aristocracy, and American poet James Russell Lowell (1876), who questioned if democracy could devolve into “a Kakistocracy… for the benefit of knaves at the cost of fools.”Modern UsageThe word saw revivals in political critique, spiking in popularity in recent years (e.g., named The Economist’s Word of the Year for 2024 amid discussions of populist governments and controversial appointments). It is often used rhetorically to criticize perceived incompetence or corruption in leadership, though no government officially identifies as one.Historical ExamplesHistorical applications include:
Share this:
Related