Justplainbill's Weblog

September 23, 2014

Europe will soon be “Juden-frei”, by Lloyd Levy [c]

[Where can they go once Israel is destroyed, which is what will happen as King Barry and Princess Hillary have let Iran develop nuclear bombs?]

BRITAIN ON WAY TO BECOMING JUDENFREI.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=Lloyd+Levy++London++18+August+2014

I actually never thought I would have to write an article like this, from the green and pleasant land of England.

However it is becoming truly frightening to be a Jew in UK. What is so remarkable is how quickly it all appears to have happened. One can now start to experience what it must have been like in parts of Europe under Nazi threat, when friends and neighbours

suddenly and without warning, turn on you because you are Jewish.

In the last week or so alone, we have seen the Tricycle Theatre banning the annual JEWISH film festival, which is one of the most important Jewish events of the calendar. The famous Edinburgh Fringe arts festival has also banned Israeli connected theatre groups.

We have the Parliamentary Member from Bradford, a large town in Yorkshire, announcing his town to be “Israeli” free, as well as reading that a leading Scottish Nationalist has apparently declared that an independent Scotland will be “Israeli free”. None of us are surely naïve enough to not understand that in practice it means Judenfrei, unless individual Jews renounce their

loyalty to Israel.

Leading Supermarkets have been invaded and ransacked by anti-Israel terrorists, threatening staff and customers.

The supermarkets have succumbed to this terrorism, with rumours swirling around that they are soon to stop

selling all Israeli products. Only a day or two ago, a major supermarket in Central London, actually took all kosher products off the shelf. Think about that- all Jewish products banned, many not even from Israel at all.

Over 100,000 people marched through London recently in an anti Israel and anti Jewish orgy of sheer hatred.

I know people whose lifelong friends are putting the most hideous anti-Semitic rantings on their “Facebook” pages.

Our Jewish so called leaders have let us down. I personally haven’t seen nor read any leading member of our Jewish representative bodies, or Rabbis, standing up in public for our community .

This is not a good time to be a Jew in Britain. Apparently in France it is far worse.. We are being cowed and terrorised by home grown anti-Semites, and by imported oriental ones. [British “code” for muslims.]

Only in the last few days have some of the leading Newspaper columnists begun to wake up to the hatred they have themselves stirred up by their coverage of Gaza, replete with its ancient Jewish blood libel of deliberate

child sacrifice.

Natan Sharansky said recently that Europe is death to Jews, and he is so correct. History shows that anything can generate the hatred. If it wasn’t Gaza it would be something else.

Lloyd Levy

London

18 August 2014

[Secession. Once there is no place left for American Values, y’all will all pray to Mecca. Me? I’ll be dead with “my gun and my Bible” (which BTW has BOTH the Old and New Testaments in it), in my hands!

“First the Saturday People, then the Sunday People.”]

September 16, 2014

ISIL’s Worst Enemy, IHS Janes [nc]

IHS.com Products Advertise Client Login

Home
Defence
Security
Industry
Multimedia
Press
Events
Magazines

HOME SECURITY TERRORISM & INSURGENCY ARTICLE
Terrorism & Insurgency
Analysis: YPG – the Islamic State’s worst enemy
Michael Stephens, JDW Correspondent – IHS Jane’s Defence Weekly
11 September 2014
A fighter from the People’s Protection Units (YPG) – a Syrian Kurdish militia – uses a DShK heavy machine gun to defend the strategically important Rabia crossing on the Iraqi-Syrian border against Islamic State fighters on 6 August 2014. (PA Photos)

While the Islamic State (IS) has swept away the armies that have stood before it, a little-known group fighting its own war against the extremist group has done remarkably well.

The People’s Protection Units (Yekîneyên Parastina Gel: YPG) are the defence force of the Democratic Administration of Rojava: the de facto autonomous Kurdish region that has been formed in northeast Syria since the outbreak of that country’s conflict in 2011. Currently engaged in combat against the IS on five front lines across northern Syria, the YPG is perhaps one of the only forces that knows how to take on the extremists at their own game.

Relying on speed, stealth, and surprise, it is the archetypal guerrilla army, able to deploy quickly to front lines and concentrate its forces before quickly redirecting the axis of its attack to outflank and ambush its enemy. The key to its success is autonomy. Although operating under an overarching tactical rubric, YPG brigades are inculcated with a high degree of freedom and can adapt to the changing battlefield.

The IS has fared well against more static forces using Soviet-based doctrines, which have proven wholly incapable of countering its highly mobile forces. Both the IS and the YPG, however, have emerged from the ashes of the Syrian conflict and have adapted their fighting styles to the territory in which they operate.

The YPG relies heavily on snipers, backed by mobile support weaponry (mainly 12.7 mm Russian-issue heavy machine guns) that carve up the battlefield and suppress enemy fire. It also uses roadside bombs to limit enemy movement and prevent outflanking manoeuvres, particularly at night.

While Iraqi Kurdish forces (known collectively as the peshmerga) are receiving military assistance from countries including France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States, the Syrian Kurds have received little such help. Accusations that they remain close to the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whose forces withdrew from Kurdish territory in 2012, and that they are closely linked to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK), which is fighting for Kurdish independence from Turkey, make them an unpalatable choice.

Turkey in particular believes the YPG to be a tool of Damascus, while those who believe the Rojava government’s aims run against the goals of the Syrian opposition often accuse the Syrian Kurdish region of being a haven for Iranian influence.

The Syrian Kurds are essentially operating in an isolated canton facing the IS to the south and a deeply suspicious and hostile Turkey to the north, while Iraq’s Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) cannot decide whether they are friend or foe.

As a result, YPG units are poorly equipped. None observed by IHS Jane’s during a recent visit to Syrian Kurdistan used body armour or helmets. Weapons and ammunition are purchased on the black market.

The Syrian Kurds have also suffered significant casualties in the constant attacks and counterattacks along the 900 km front. For example, the battle of Jazza’a (a strategic town on the Syria-Iraq border that protects the humanitarian corridor) lasted for nine days from 19 August and cost both sides tens of casualties.

Yet the YPG’s lines have yet to break when attacked by better-equipped IS forces. The YPG has even managed to expand into Iraq, largely thanks to the retreat of the KRG’s peshmerga from around Mount Sinjar following the IS advance in early August. The persecuted Yazidi minority fleeing the conflict were protected by YPG units before making their way north via the humanitarian corridor running through northeast Syria into Turkey.

Eager to avenge IS atrocities, many Yazidis have asked the YPG for weapons and training. The YPG has so far trained more than 1,000 in one-week military courses and sent them back to Sinjar, where they operate as local defence units under YPG and PKK supervision. The result is that the YPG now occupies areas in Iraq previously controlled by the peshmerga.

YPG officials deny having permanent intentions on Iraqi territory, but it is unclear what the future holds. Even if the YPG withdraws from the Sinjar area, the Yazidi units left behind appear loyal to the YPG, not the peshmerga. For their part, the Iraqi Kurds have insisted there can be no discussion on this matter and that the YPG presence is a violation of sovereignty.

For now the YPG and peshmerga appear to be putting their differences aside. However, serious problems could emerge once the IS threat recedes. Indeed, both Iraqi and Syrian Kurdish officials told IHS Jane’s they will try to resolve the issue amicably, while each casting the other side as the instigator.

The future for the YPG holds more conflict. The IS is unlikely to cease its attacks on the Kurds for the time being, given that they control strategic border crossings and block the road from its capital in Syria’s Al-Raqqah across to the city of Aleppo. Syria’s Kurds appear capable of holding out, but they know that more martyrs (who are glorified in their culture) will fall before the IS is permanently beaten back.

September 8, 2014

Immigration Reform, by Cmdr Matt Shipley, USN [nc]

[taken from Cmdr Shipley’s blog: American Founding Principles, found in wordpress.com]
Immigration Reform
Jul16

The youthful tidal wave plunging over America’s southern border has brought the immigration debate to a critical crescendo. While most Americans are struggling with what is the moral and ethical thing to do with the children, the two political parties are struggling with how they are going to out-maneuver the other in a political chess match that has the future control of America at stake. The debate centers on giving citizenship, with full voting privileges, to people who come to America illegally.

Nearly every decision, collectively made by elected officials is done with one of two main goals in mind; either to stay in political power or gain more political power. These two goals are the prime motivator for nearly every decision made, every law passed, and every political speech delivered. In short, human political philosophy holds, if a law is passed that is beneficial for the people, then so much the better, but if it is not and one can politically get away with it, then so be it as long as the law increases their chances for re-election.

For example, the Democratic Party puts millions of taxpayer dollars into Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two failed but still government-supported home loan institutions that were at the center of disastrous housing bubble. In return Fannie and Freddie heavily donate to Democratic Party candidates.

Another example is the Republican Party framing national security issues in a way to validate massive defense spending. While national defense is vitally important and government funding of it is certainly constitutional, the amount of spending and the manner in which it is spent exceed the nation’s defense requirements. The military industrial complex that has grown out of this spending supports an interventionist foreign policy[1] vice a defensive foreign policy and the money made by the military industrial complex goes back into supporting Republican candidates all at tax payer expense.

Some may see this as an unwarranted cynical view, but it is a regretful fact of human nature that has become more prevalent as America drifts farther and farther away from its Reformed Christian foundation.[2] Individual politicians may go to Washington for altruistic reasons, but they too are frequently caught up in party politics if they have a desire to be re-elected.

The electorate must take this into consideration when weighing arguments made about questions of national magnitude. Politicians will always frame their arguments in the best light, but in order not to be led astray by political double talk and duplicitous reasoning, citizens must look past the window dressing and see the political motives behind each argument.

Immigration is not about fairness, hospitality, morality, or even the welfare of immigrants, it is about changing the electoral demographics of America. The Democratic Party has championed the illegal immigration cause, and now Hispanics, who according to the US Census Bureau’s 2013 statistics, make up 17.1% of the US population and overwhelmingly support Democratic party candidates. If the Democratic party continues to be successful in expanding privileges for illegal immigrants and in thwarting voter identification laws to make it easier for illegals to vote in elections, then the Democratic party will more easily remain in control.

If this happens, it will leave the Republican party no choice but to pander to the same voting block of illegal immigrants and Hispanics. At that point, we might as well invite the politicians from the countries from where the immigrants came to come run our county as well, because the results will be nearly identical.

If you personally do not like the thought of living under the government in Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, San Salvador, or Nicaragua, then you should think twice about supporting any politician pandering to illegal immigrants or the community that supports them. In spite of the narrative advanced by supporters of illegal immigration, the majority of Americans are completely fine with legal immigrants, who entered America in compliance with American immigration law.

Before anyone of us answers what is moral and ethical in the current unfolding humanitarian crisis, we should consider for what purpose “We the people” gave Congress the power “To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,”[3] and how that power should be wielded in our present time.

Congress first passed an act dealing with “an uniform Rule of Naturalization” on March 26, 1790, that stipulated an alien must be a “free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years…and making proof … that he is a person of good character.”

From a 21st century perspective, this is sure to seem like a very “racist” statement, yet when put within an 18th century context we should all be able to see it for what it was, a statement of self-preservation.

While people of non-European ethnicity and skin color lived in America as freemen during our struggle for independence and even made significant contributions to that independence, they were the exception not the rule. Their contributions came primarily from an adopted world view that was not common in the countries or continents from where they descended. Whereas, “white” people who came primarily from Europe could easily be assimilated into American culture without too much risk of their overwhelming the culture and changing it irrevocably.

Preservation of American culture was the goal of our earliest immigration laws and it should be the goal of our current immigration laws as well. Much has changed since the 18th century and skin pigmentation is not and rightfully should not be a factor in determining modern day immigration eligibility, but a person’s motives for immigrating and their world view still should be.

On January 29, 1795, Congress passed another naturalization act that extended the length of time of eligible residency to five years and added the stipulation that an applicant must make proof that they are “of a good moral character, attached to the principles of the constitution of the United States, and well disposed to the good order and happiness of the same.”

If illegal immigrants do not respect our laws in coming to America, what evidence is there to support the claim they will respect our Constitution afterwards? By breaking our immigration laws they have demonstrated a lack of moral character and complete disregard for our laws and our way of life.

In 1795, the term of eligibility was extended to five years to better assimilate 18th century immigrants into American culture. What would it take to assimilate modern immigrants coming across our southern border?

Most all Americans welcome with open arms anyone who wants to come to America for the purpose of upholding the principles that made us free, but if immigrants come or came illegally, they have already demonstrated the lack of character to do this and no amount of time will change this within them.

It is for this reason, citizenship with full voting privileges should never be an option for anyone who has ever come or will come to America illegally. While mass deportation is not a fiscally or functionally viable option, selective deportation should be swift and sure to any legal or illegal immigrant, given amnesty or not, who does not conform to American laws, language, or customs.

On November 6, 1986, Congress passed the Immigration Reform and Control Act, also known as the Simpson-Mazzoli Act. This act passed Congress as a quid pro quo in which one political party accepted amnesty and full voting privileges for illegal aliens living continuously in the United States since 1982; the other political party accepted increased border security to deter further illegal immigration and avert another immigration crisis.

Since the immigration deterrent portion of this measure has proven completely unsuccessful, the other part of the quid pro quo should be equally null and void by rescinding voting privileges of all illegal immigrants, no matter when they arrived.

Rescinding voting privileges needs to be enacted at the State level, because the Constitution did not originally grant the national government authority over who is authorized to vote. Except for the clause “the Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislator” [4] no other clause in the Constitution addresses voter qualifications. This means, without a legitimately ratified amendment granting voter qualification authority to the national government, which the Fourteenth Amendment is not,[5] the national government is restricted from making any law concerning voter qualifications.

Another issue the coercively and fraudulently ratified Fourteenth Amendment has caused, is the “anchor baby” issue in which illegal immigrants claim citizenship for their children simply because they are born on American soil. It takes more than being born in America to be an American and it is past time our national government legally recognizes this. Children reared by parents who openly violated US law in coming to America are not the people we want as citizens.

The Simpson-Mazzoli Act was based on the flawed theory that if the US limited job opportunities through employer penalties for hiring illegal aliens, mass illegal immigration would stop. This theory may have proved true if our national government had not created a social welfare state in which nearly everything needed in society is provided free of charge. This list includes education at publicly funded schools, health-care at hospital emergency rooms, housing and even spending money directly from the national government. Such handouts make it possible for people coming from third world countries to live better in America than they did from where they previously lived without even getting a job. What reasonable, and most likely desperate, person would pass up such an opportunity?

Nationally imposed minimum wage laws also contribute to continued illegal immigration, because illegals are willing to take sub-minimum wage pay “under the table” and still live better than they did before they came.

Eliminating all social welfare spending at every level of government,[6] de-funding public schools,[7] allowing hospitals to determine to whom they will provide charitable health-care, restricting voter privileges indefinitely for all illegals, and allowing States or even individual counties to set minimum wage standards, if they so choose, within their jurisdiction would go a long way to deterring mass illegal immigration. Even if these measures would not stop mass illegal immigration, they would significantly reduce the tax burden Americans now bear to support others transgressing our laws and it would eliminate a major political motive to encourage and protect illegal immigration.

While the children inundating our southerner border is a heart rendering situation, our national government, which is already deeply in debt, does not have the resources to provide for the volume of children flooding in, much less every child in the world living under similar situations and conditions.

Neither is it the responsibility of the American taxpayer to bear this burden; it is the responsibility of the adults living in the society from where these children have come to change their government in a way that will rectify the wrongs they are living with instead of exporting the ideology that created the corrupt, tyrannical beast under whose authority they now suffer. Americans were and still are willing to fight for their independence, others must be willing to fight for their own as well.

The President, who frequently has claimed he has “a pen and a phone”, should stop pretending to hide behind an obscure law written to prevent human sex trafficking and immediately send the children back to where they came. If for no other reason than to dissuade others from sending more children our way and further overwhelming our ability to provide for them.

To answer the ethical and moral dilemma of the youthful human tidal wave plunging across America’s southern border, we as a nation, should not support their remaining in America funded by our tax dollars and we should minimize expenditures made in handling them, because there is nothing charitable about giving other people’s money away.[8] But, if individuals or groups want to take fiscal responsibility of the children or adopt them outright then our President, Congress and every other citizen should encourage them to do so.

[1] American Founding Principles, Constitutional Foreign Policy, August 28, 2013.

[2] American Founding Principles, Freedom in America: The Unifying Idea, June 17, 2013.

[3] U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 4.

[4] U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 2, Clause 1.

[5] The Fourteenth Amendment was allegedly ratified on July 9, 1868, but the northern controlled House and Senate
had made ratification of the amendment a requirement for “allowing” the individual Confederate States to
“rejoin” the union. Not only did their coercion not work, but several “Union” States: New Jersey, Ohio, Kentucky,
California, Delaware and Maryland, also refused to ratify the amendment. Unable to obtain the three fourths
of the States required to ratify it, Congress did the next best thing and announced that it had been ratified
and acted as if it were.

[6] American Founding Principles, Who is General Welfare?, October 15, 2012.

[7] American Founding Principles, Fixing Public Education, September 13, 2012.

[8] American Founding Principles, Who is General Welfare?, October 15, 2012.

August 28, 2014

Stealth Jihad, 2014 ISNA (Islamic Society of N.A.), Detroit, from Thomas More Law Center [nc]

Thomas More Law Center News Alert

Is this email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
Detroit ISNA Conference – Stealth Jihad for The Subjugation of America

ISNA (Islamic Society of North America) will be holding its annual convention in Detroit this weekend beginning Friday, August 29 and ending September 1. ISNA was designated by federal prosecutors as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, the largest terrorism financing trial in American history. A 1991 Muslim Brotherhood memorandum introduced in that trial identified ISNA as one of its front organizations. The memorandum further stated the Brotherhood’s “work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within … so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

Detroit ISNA Conference – Stealth Jihad for The Subjugation of America

Astonishingly, despite ISNA’s terrorist ties, former President Jimmy Carter will be the convention’s keynote speaker. Carter, also, recently called for the legitimization of Hamas, which is listed by the US government as a terrorist organization. In addition to Carter, several other prominent non-Muslim political leaders will be speaking at the convention.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, about an hour’s drive from Detroit, commented, “The participation of these political leaders is giving the ISNA convention the cover of respectability and as a result is enabling ISNA and other the other Muslim extremists at the convention to achieve their goal of a “Grand Jihad” to subjugate America.”

An integral aspect of ISNA’s plan for the subjugation of America is to portray itself as a peaceful, mainstream charitable institution. It is part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy of “civilization jihad.” While most Americans are focused on violent jihad, civilization jihad is even more dangerous to American security. According to Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy, it is “a form of political and psychological warfare that includes multi-layered cultural subversion, the co-opting of senior leaders, influence operations, propaganda and other means of insinuating Shariah gradually into Western societies.”

Erick Stakelbeck, a terrorism expert and author of the book “The Brotherhood: America’s Next Great Enemy,” compared the Muslim Brotherhood’s strategy to that of “termites.” “The Muslim Brotherhood in America and really around the world are like termites. They burrow into a host society. They eat away at it until the day comes where they are ready to make their move.”

Siraj Wahhaj, one of the scheduled speakers at the conference, was the first Muslim cleric to deliver opening prayers to Congress. In his prayer he recited from the Koran and asked God to guide America’s leaders “and grant them righteousness and wisdom.” A year later, he told a Muslim audience in New Jersey that, “If only Muslims were more clever politically, they could take over the United States and replace its constitutional government with a caliphate.” He was later named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

In one of his sermons, Wahhaj said: “In time, this so-called democracy will crumble, and there will be nothing, and the only thing that will remain will be Islam.”

Abdurahman Alamoudi conducted the Muslim Brotherhood’s most successful infiltration of our political and defense establishments. He advised Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush. He penetrated and compromised our military and both the Democrat and Republican national organizations. He established the Muslim Chaplain Program for the Defense Department. He was the certifying authority for Muslim chaplains serving with the U.S. military. He appeared with President Bush at a press conference days after the 9/11 attacks. In 2005, the U.S. Treasury Department publicly admitted that Alamoudi was the top Al-Qaeda fundraiser in the United States. Alamoudi is currently serving a 23-year prison sentence for his terrorist related activities.

Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi of the Muslim Brotherhood, told a youth conference in Toledo, Ohio in 1998, “We will conquer Europe, we will conquer America.”

August 18, 2014

FYI/ All Hands: Gatestone Institute [nc]

Gatestone Institute

About Us
Events
Experts
Authors
Archives
Gatestone in the Media
Donate

About Gatestone Institute

“Let us tenderly and kindly cherish, therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write.”
— John Adams

Gatestone Institute, a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank is dedicated to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report in promoting:

Institutions of Democracy and the Rule of Law;
Human Rights
A free and strong economy
A military capable of ensuring peace at home and in the free world
Energy independence
Ensuring the public stay informed of threats to our individual liberty, sovereignty and free speech.

Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts — analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.

Gatestone Institute will be publishing books, and continues to publish an online daily report, http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org, that features topics such as military and diplomatic threats to the United States and our allies; events in the Middle East and their possible consequences, and the transparency and accountability of international organizations.

Gatestone Institute is funded by private donors and foundations. We are grateful for your support.
Ambassador John R. Bolton, Chairman
Board of Governors (in formation)

M. Zuhdi Jasser
Lawrence Kadish
Douglas Murray
Naomi Perlman
Ingeborg Rennert
Rebecca Sugar
Christine Williams

Amir Taheri, Chairman, Europe Board of Governors
Board of Governors, Gatestone Europe

Chairman, Amir Taheri
Josef Joffe
Anne-Elisabeth Moutet

Nina Rosenwald, President
Naomi H. Perlman, Vice President
Change text size:
Follow Gatestone:
FacebookTwitterRSS
Subscribe To Mailing List
Subscribe To Mailing List
Latest Articles
Why Jordan Doesn’t Want More Palestinians

by Khaled Abu Toameh

By mistreating the Palestinians and depriving them of their basic rights, Jordan and other Arab countries are driving them into the open arms of extremists, especially Islamist groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.

Jordan, Lebanon and Syria can continue their practices against Palestinians without having to worry about the responses of the international community or the media. No one is going to take to the streets of European and American cities to condemn Arabs for mistreating Arabs.
Why I Support Israel

by David Draiman

There is no distinction between “anti-Zionists” and anti-Semites. They are chanting, “Death to the Jews.” They are not singling out the Israeli army or government, so let’s just have you take your masks off, shall we?

Hamas, however, always targets civilians — always. What if such a threat were aimed at your family? Your wife? Your son?

“Israel was founded on land stolen from the Palestinian people.” FALSE.
Islamic State: “We Will Take Spain Back”

by Soeren Kern

Calls to reconquer al-Andalus are becoming more frequent and more strident.

“Clearly Spain forms part of the strategic objectives of global jihad. We are not the only ones but we are in their sights.” — Spanish Interior Minister Jorge Fernández Díaz.
Krugerplein, Again

by Martin Bosma

There are people who see Islamic immigration as a positive thing; that it creates “cultural enrichment” and “thriving immigrant neighborhoods.” This is the vision of the liberal elites. There is also the reality.
Britain’s “Murky Anti-Semitic Subculture”

by Samuel Westrop

For Israel to receive any leniency in the Western press, more Jews have to be killed; meanwhile, countless Muslims, it seems, can slaughter each other without eliciting any condemnation on the streets of London or Paris.
Most Shared

Supporting Hamas is Anti-Semitic
by Alan M. Dershowitz
The New Romantics
by Denis MacEoin
Are “Integrated Muslims” Integrated?
by Douglas Murray
The Muslim Colonists: Forgotten Facts about the Arab-Israeli Conflict
by Ezequiel Doiny
Krugerplein, Again
by Martin Bosma

Most Viewed

Islamic State: “We Will Take Spain Back”
by Soeren Kern
Are “Integrated Muslims” Integrated?
by Douglas Murray
Krugerplein, Again
by Martin Bosma
The New Romantics
by Denis MacEoin
The Muslim Colonists: Forgotten Facts about the Arab-Israeli Conflict
by Ezequiel Doiny

Copyright © 2014 Gatestone Institute.
All rights reserved.

The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute.

Both reserve the right not to publish replies to articles should they so choose
Gatestone Contacts

Contact: info@gatestoneinstitute.org
Membership: membership@gatestoneinstitute.org
Editorial: editor@gatestoneinstitute.org
Letters: letters@gatestoneinstitute.org

Events: events@gatestoneinstitute.org
Technical: webmaster@gatestoneinstitute.org
Corrections: corrections@gatestoneinstitute.org
Gatestone LINKS

About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Events
Archives

August 14, 2014

Readable Summation of the Q’Ran, by Justplainbill [c]

Appendix C
(of The Albany Plan Re-Visited)

When discussing the current world Islamo-Fascist terrorist Jihad against the infidel, defined as all non-Muslims, you will have something to read and to counter any argument to a person who does not understand the totalitarian despotism of this intolerant and exclusive religion. For over 1,200 years, these people have been attempting to take over the world and its people for their own personal aggrandizement and religious zeal; The Spoils 8 & Repentance 9, on pages 35 and 36 herein are MUST READS, as well as Women 4, on pp 38 and 39, if you don’t believe me.

I originally made these notes while researching various religious societies as an undergraduate. At the time that I made them, I also read The Bible, The Works of Josephus, The Book of Mormon, The Bhagavad-Gita, The I-Ching, Confucius, Plato and a patchwork of essays on pre-Columbian American beliefs including the Plains’ Indians Societies. Because of those circumstances, certain verses are ignored while others are edited to mere shadows of their original prose. With this copy, I’ve edited some things and added or deleted others. I’ve left some of my more immature commentary in place for personal reasons. I reviewed Mohammed 47: and decided to copy it over as well as a few others, in their entireties so that the reader can get the feel of the prose as well as to keep certain concepts in their original context. I picked Mohammed 47 in particular because of its content, which I do not want the reader exposed to out of context which he would be if I had left it in my note form. I have highlighted certain portions in RED. By no means, repeat no means, do my comments herein include all of the vileness inherent in the Q’Ran. For a best view of it, I strongly suggest reading, The Legacy of Jihad; Islamic Holy War and the Fate of Non-Muslims, Andrew G. Gostom, M.D., Promotheus Books ISBN 1-59102-307-6 © 2005.
My Notes and Commentary:

Citations from the Q’Ran

The Following Citations were taken from The Koran, originally translated by N. J. Dawood, Penguin Classics © 1956, ISBN 0-14-044.052-6. Herewith are from the 4th Revised Edition, 12th reprint 1973. Professor Dawood put his translation into chronological order as best he could. I strongly recommend the reading of this book, and reading the introduction at least twice before entering the work itself. I have placed my personal comments in brackets [ ]. (And, as Prof. Dawood is British educated, I’ve left his spelling and grammar intact as well.)

p.9 “The Koran (the Arabic name means The Recital) is the earliest and by far the finest work of Classical Arabic prose. For Muslims it is the infallible word of God, a transcript of a tablet preserved in heaven, revealed to the Prophet Mohammed by the Angel Gabriel. Except in the opening verses and some few passages in which the Prophet or the Angel speaks in the first person, the speaker throughout is God.”
[From the introduction by Professor Dawood, emphasis is mine.]

[So, unlike both the Old Testament and the New Testament, there is an intermediary for some of the verses. In the Old Testament, The God of Abraham speaks to his people directly and in the New Testament, we have, purportedly, first hand reports of what happened, although, considering the difference, if any, between the pseudo-Pauline and the Pauline, who can tell? Interesting, as this means that not the whole work is the Word of God. Naturally, this leaves open the option of alternative interpretation for every single one of those passages. A point Mohammed makes several times is that no one from the West comes to speak to the Arab peoples, yet if memory serves, the Apostle Thomas went East and was martyred by the Arabs, hmm.]

The Cataclysm 82: … The righteous shall surely dwell in bliss. But the wicked shall burn in Hell-fire upon the Judgement-day: they shall not escape. …

[Not particularly different from orthodox Christianity on quite a few points.]

Man 76: … For the unbelievers We have prepared fetters and chains, and a blazing Fire. But the righteous shall drink of a cup tempered at the Camphor Fountain, a gushing spring at which the servants of Allah will refresh themselves: they who keep their vows and dread the far-spread terrors of Judgement-day; who, though they hold it dear, give sustenance to the poor man, the orphan, and the captive, saying: ‘We feed you for Allah’s sake only; we seek of you neither recompense nor thanks: for we fear from Him a day of anguish and of woe.’

[Man also describes paradise and ends with:]

The unbelievers love this fleeting life too well, and thus prepare for themselves a heavy day of doom. We created them, and endowed their limbs and joints with strength; but if We please We can replace them by other men.
This is indeed an admonition. Let him that will, take the right path to his Lord. Yet you cannot will, except by the will of Allah. Allah is wise and all-knowing.
He is merciful to whom He will: but for the wrongdoers He has prepared a grievous punishment.

[So, one may pose as a believer, yet be an unbeliever in his heart; hypocrites don’t seem to be limited to infidels. Wonder what the oil Sheiks make of this when they pray.]

Noah 71: … And Noah said: ‘Lord, do not leave a single unbeliever in the land. If you spare them they will mislead Your servants and beget none but sinners and unbelievers. Forgive me, Lord, and forgive my parents and every true believer who seeks refuge in my house. Forgive all the faithful, men and women, and hasten the destruction of the wrong-doers.’

[Not at all like from The Pentateuch Genesis 6:1 to 9:15]

The Fig 95: We moulded man into a most noble image and in the end We shall reduce him to the lowest of the low: except the believers who do good works, for theirs shall be a boundless recompense.

[The Fig suggests that one must be both a believer and do good works in order to attain Paradise. In The Old Testament man was required to be righteous, or, to be right with God. One did this by following the laws which included doing good works, certain dietary restrictions, clothing, &c. The New Testament, according to Paul, means that one must accept and follow the word of God, thereby allowing Christianity to become all inclusive as one did not have to follow all of the laws of The Old Testament. Simon, also known as Peter (from the Greek Petros for rock), and James, also known as The Just, disagreed with Paul and declared that one must follow both the laws and the word, stringently, thereby making Christianity exclusively Jewish. Consider this in light of The Proof 98: below.]

Night 92: … It is for Us to give guidance. Ours is the life of this world, Ours the life to come. I warn you, then, of the blazing fire, in which none shall burn save the hardened sinner, who denies the truth and gives no heed. But the good man who purifies himself by almsgiving shall keep away from it: and so shall he that does good works for the sake of the Most High only, not in recompense for a favour. Such men shall be content.

[Oddly enough, Night does not require that one be a believer to have God “smooth the path of salvation;” just that “For him that gives in charity and guards himself against evil and believes in goodness,”; also, that only the hardened sinner will burn in eternity, since elsewhere the hardened sinner includes among them the unbeliever, defined as one who does not accept the Koran as the final Word, then it becomes obvious that non-believers are open game for the believer even though Night suggests otherwise.]

The Declining Day 103: I swear by the declining day that perdition shall be the lot of man, except for those who have faith and do good works and exhort each other to justice and fortitude.

[A quick point: every verse begins with, “In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful.” Obviously, I’ve not included that. Also, it seems that throughout, one must have faith AND do good works &c. in order to attain Paradise.]

The Proof 98:
The unbelievers among the People of the Book (Jews and Christians, the Book being the Bible) and the pagans did not desist from unbelief until the Proof was given them: an apostle from Allah reading sanctified pages from eternal scriptures.
Nor did the People of the Book disagree among themselves until the Proof was given them. Yet they were enjoined to serve Allah and to worship none but Him, to attend to their prayers and to pay the alms-tax. That, surely, is the true faith.
The unbelievers among the People of the Book and the pagans shall burn for ever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures.
But of all creatures those that embrace the Faith and do good works are the noblest. Allah will reward them with the gardens of Eden, gardens watered by running streams where they shall dwell for ever.
Allah is well pleased with them and they with Him. Thus shall the God-fearing be rewarded.

[This is The Proof in its entirety. Notice the ambiguity as to who will punish the unbeliever, Allah or Muslim. Also, note the recurrence of the necessity to do good works as well as to believe. An interesting point here is that the Proof is referring to itself as the proof that all must believe – a tautological impossibility of validation. Another key point is that the people of the book did not disagree amongst themselves until the Proof was revealed. Considering the hostility between Jews and Christians over the preceding 700 years, that statement seems quite ingenuous.]

The Overwhelming Event 88:
Have you heard of the Event which will overwhelm mankind?
On that day there shall be downcast faces, of men broken and worn out, burnt by a scorching fire, drinking from a seething fountain. Their only food shall be bitter thorns, which will neither sustain them nor satisfy their hunger. …
Therefore give warning. Your duty is only to warn them: you are not their keeper. As for those that turn their backs and disbelieve, Allah will inflict on them the supreme chastisement. To Us they shall return, and We will bring them to account.

[Kind of explicit as to what a believer’s duty is to the unbeliever, isn’t it? Like, the believers’ only duty is TO WARN the unbeliever that Doomsday has been preset and that the infidel had better get his act together.]

The Most High 87: … We shall guide you to the smoothest path. Therefore give warning, if warning will avail them (the unbelievers of Mecca). He that fears Allah will heed it, but the wicked sinner will flout it. He shall be cast into the raging Fire; he shall neither live nor die. Happy shall be the man who purifies himself, who remembers the name of his Lord and prays to Him.
Yet you prefer this life, although the life to come is better and more lasting.
All this is written in earlier scriptures; the scriptures of Abraham and Moses.

Mary 19: [Mary is a long verse which must be read by one in its entirety. It is extremely important and must be contemplated in one’s heart. My personal opinion of it is irrelevant, but to understand that which is Islam, one must read Mary and apply its teachings to the current acts of Islam.]

The Nightly Visitant 86: … They scheme against you: but I, too, have My schemes. Therefore bear with the unbelievers, and let them be awhile.

[This is the last line of verse 86. It clearly states that Allah will deal with the unbelievers and that Islam must, “… bear with the unbelievers, and let them be awhile.”]

Joseph 12: [This history of Joseph and his trials and tribulations in Egypt, needs to be compared with Genesis 37:1 to 50:26.]

The Constellations 85: … Those that persecute believers, men or women, and never repent shall be rewarded with the scourge of Hell, the scourge of the Conflagration. But those that have faith and do good works shall be rewarded with gardens watered by running streams. That is the supreme triumph. …

[Yep, can’t get to Paradise without (i) believing; & (ii) doing good works; interesting considering the extreme lack of charity and abundance of arrogance amongst believers.]

The Rending 84: … Therefore proclaim to all a woeful doom, save those who embrace the true faith and do good works; for theirs is an unfailing recompense.

[Once again, you must be a true believer and do good works to enter paradise, as well as their duty is only to warn the unbeliever.]

The Soul-Snatchers 79: [a very quick Moses & Pharaoh, compare with Exodus 1 through Deuteronomy 34]

… But when the supreme day arrives – the day when man will call to mind his labours – when the Fire is brought in sight of all – those that transgressed and chose this present life will find themselves in Hell; but those that feared to stand before their Lord and curbed their souls’ desires shall dwell in Paradise. …

[Once again, we’re back to transgressions will be punished by Allah, not man. Also, that the last day has already been decided upon, i.e. the last day of Creation has been fixed and, apparently, was at the moment of Creation. Wonder what Dr. Hawkings thinks of that?]

The Tidings 78: … Fixed is the Day of Judgement. On that day the Trumpet shall be sounded and you shall come in multitudes. The gates of heaven shall swing open and the mountains shall pass away and become like vapour.
Hell will lie in ambush, a home for the transgressors. There they shall abide long ages; there they shall taste neither refreshment nor any drink, save boiling water and decaying filth; a fitting recompense.
They disbelieved in Our reckoning and roundly denied Our revelations. But We counted all their doings and wrote them down. We shall say: ‘Taste this: you shall have nothing but mounting torment!’
As for the righteous, they shall surely triumph. Theirs shall be gardens and vineyards, and high-bosomed maidens for companions: a truly overflowing cup.

That day is sure to come. Let him who will, seek a way back to his Lord. We have forewarned you of an imminent scourge: the day when man will look upon his works and the unbeliever cry: ‘Would that I were dust!’

[So much for eternity, looks like Creation has a specific end date. A repeating theme, noted here, is that in Hell one eats shit and drinks boiling water as well as being burned by the scourging conflagration throughout all eternity. This gets boring after awhile; sort of an intellectual numbness from the constant repetition.]

Those that are sent forth 77: [Woe on that day to the misbelievers. A strong verse that says the misbelievers are going to be a very sorry lot on judgement day. I’m taking it that unbelievers and misbelievers are two distinct groups; misbelievers are Jews and Christians, as they have been given prophets and scriptures which they have refused to accept and have ‘disagreed’ over, whereas unbelievers are pagans, heathens and those others who’ve been exposed to the Word by missionaries but have refused to accept the Word as divine revelation and, hence, the truth, in either event, all non-Muslims are going to Hell, so why differentiate?]

The Resurrection 75: [Allah knows everything and can do everything, when judgement day arrives (when sun and moon are brought together) and man confounded, no amount of pleading will save the unbeliever nor the false believer. Wonder how you define, “false believer?”]

The Ladders 70: [The good shall be blessed, the evil punished. Lust is a transgression except when one goes into his wives or his slave girls. A transgressor is one who does not give to the needy, share his wealth unstintingly, keep his word, bear true witness and attend to his prayers. Is this the same as being a false believer? The day of judgement shall be fifty thousand years long, different verse has the last day timed at one thousand years. This particular verse mentions slaves, thus slavery is legal within Islam – how can anyone consider a peaceful existence with a group that looks upon all non-members as slaves and potential slaves?]

The Mantled One 73: [It’s best to meditate at night for the day is for work.] Bear patiently with what they (the unbelievers) say and leave their company without recrimination. Leave to Me those that deny the truth, those that enjoy the comforts of this life; bear with them yet a little while. We have in store for them heavy fetters and a blazing fire, choking food and a harrowing torment. This shall be their lot on the day when the earth shakes with all its mountains, and the mountains crumble into heaps of shifting sand.

[And, unbelievers and transgressors shall go to hell, but, again, Allah will do the judging and punishing.]

The Inevitable 69: [True believers are going to heaven and everyone else is going to hell. Being a true believer means caring for the poor and orphans as well as praying properly.]

… We shall say: ‘Lay hold of him (the evil ones) and bind him. Burn him in the fire of Hell, then fasten him with a chain seventy cubits long. For he did not believe in Allah, the Most High, nor did he care to feed the poor. Today he shall be friendless here; filth shall be his food, the filth which sinners eat.’

Noah 10: [ends:] … Observe what is revealed to you, and have patience till Allah makes known his judgment. He is the best of judges.

[Long dissertation that starts with the good will go to heaven and wrongdoers will be punished in accordance with their evilness. It then goes on referencing Noah and how Noah was treated and ignored, though it doesn’t track completely with the Old Testament – kind of odd since both are attributed to the same source. Seems to be more confirmation that Allah will do all the judging and that He is the only one who knows the truth and that true believers must be patient and await His judgment. Hmm, how do the terrorists and militants reconcile this with their acts?]

Sovereignty 67: … He created life and death that He might put you to the proof and find out which of you acquitted himself best. … We have adorned the lowest heaven with lamps, missiles for pelting devils. We have prepared a scourge of flames for these, and the scourge of Hell for unbelievers: an evil fate!
When they are flung into its fire they shall hear it roaring and seething as though bursting with rage. And every time a multitude is thrown therein, its keepers will say to them: ‘Did no one come to warn you?’ ‘Yes,’ they will reply, ‘but we rejected him and said: “Allah has revealed nothing: you are in grave error.” ‘ and they will say: ‘If only we listened and understood, we should not now be among the tenants of Hell.’
Thus they shall confess their sin. Far from Allah’s mercy are the heirs of Hell. …
Whether you speak in secret or aloud, He knows your inmost thoughts. Shall He who has created all things not know them all? He is wise and all-knowing. …

[The purpose of Life is to allow free will so that each soul may choose between good and evil as a ‘proof,’ sort of a final exam maybe? Unbelief is a sin; Allah knows all; many profess belief but He knows all; there is a certain amount of free will implied in the constant references to warnings – if there is a warning then acceptance of the warning is implicit, thus, free will. In context, I’m assuming that the missiles are for the devils to pelt the tenants with, any other reading implies that the tenants will be pelting the devils, which is quite unlikely, but, … . Does this actually mean that one can believe in The Creator, but not Mohammed?]

The Story 28: [Moses and Pharaoh; compare with Exodus and Deuteronomy. It is also clear from the reading that Allah is the God of Moses, and therefore, the Christ, although, back at Proof, it is clear that Jews and Christians have deliberately turned from the path of The Bible, hence both the need for the Koran as well as for the warnings against unbelievers.]

The Ant 27: [Moses and Pharaoh; Solomon and David]

… As for those who sin and then do good instead of evil, I am forgiving and merciful to them. … [Story of Solomon and the Queen of Sheba, how Allah is Solomon and David’s God, and how He brought them to victory.] … This Koran declares to the Israelites most of that concerning which they disagree. It is a guide and a blessing to true believers. Your Lord will rightly judge them.

[More on heaven and Hell-Fire, repentance with penance is apparently acceptable, and once again, Allah will be the judge. Kind of odd that as it is designed to straighten out the Jews that it was given in Arabic; for the four thousands years preceding this, when Allah wanted to talk to the Jews he did it either directly, note the burning bush for Moses and the direct voice from the heavens for Noah, or sent a specific Jewish prophet amongst them. The Jews must’ve really pissed off Mohammed somewhere along the line as he is constantly pointing an evil finger at them without being any more explicit about why than that which is in the Proof.]

Cheating 64: … The unbelievers deny the Resurrection. Say: ‘By the Lord, you shall assuredly be raised to life! Then you shall be told of all that you have done. That is easy enough for Allah.’ …
The day on which He will assemble you, the day on which you shall all be gathered – that shall be a day of cheating (when the blessed will ‘cheat’ the damned of their places in Paradise which would have been theirs had they been true believers ‘Al-Beidhawi’). Those that believe in Allah and do what is right shall be forgiven their sins and admitted to gardens watered by running streams, where they shall dwell for ever. That is the supreme triumph. But those that disbelieve Our revelations and deny them shall be the heirs of Hell and shall abide therein for ever. Evil shall be their fate. …

[Seems to be a conflict between predestination and free will, here, also, that he who forgives and pardons wrongdoers will be exalted and forgiven in his own turn; and, since most Jews that I know believe in some form of resurrection, i.e., that something moves on after death, I find Mohammed’s constant anti-Semitism and anti-Christian tirades to be odd and, so far, without basis in fact or even in Myth, for that matter.]

The Hypocrites 63: … (The hypocrites) use their faith as a disguise and debar others from the path of Allah. Evil is what they do.

[Those who have professed belief and then have recanted are evil and Allah will not forgive them. Is this the basis for the death penalty for those who leave ‘the true faith’? What happened to ‘Allah will judge them’? Wonder what Khomeini & bin Laden think when they read this passage, if they ever actually read the Koran, and not just meaninglessly mouth memorized verses?]

The Cave 18: (Mohammed must give warning) of a dire scourge from Him, proclaim to the faithful who do good works that a rich and everlasting reward awaits them, and admonish those who say that Allah has begotten a son. Surely of this they could have no knowledge, neither they nor their fathers: a monstrous blasphemy is that which they utter. They (Jews and Christians) preach nothing but falsehoods. … [The sleepers await in the cave and are brought forth to pronounce the faith] … Therefore, when you dispute about them, adhere only to that which is revealed (herein) and do not ask any Christian concerning them.

[More of Moses and heaven and hell {when the tenants of hell cry out for water, water hotter than boiling brass will be poured on their faces &c.}. Much of this seems to be saying that Christians and Jews have corrupted the Word of God and are misguiding souls to hell, whereas only this Koran is the true word of God. Also, that Jesus was not the begotten Son of God and all that say so blaspheme and are certain of eternity in hell. Does that include Mother Theresa, who did good works and gave unstintingly to the poor, the afflicted and to orphans? And so, here we have his complaint with Christians, that Christians accept Jesus as begotten of Allah, considering the scripture promising that one will be sent, i.e. the messiah, I can see where a certain ambiguity could arise, especially considering that all that I have to go on are translations and that most translators cannot possibly be culturally contextual with what they write when the basis is ungrammatical and pre-contemporary. How many times did I feel confused by Josephus’ style as translated? Too many!]

Abraham 14: [As in certain other verses, there is reiteration of Old Testament stories and parables, except that Yahweh has been changed to Allah, hence the suggestion to compare with the Bible. More of heaven and hell and how one gets to each place as well. Unbelievers and their heresy will be brought to naught and sent to hell.]

Friday, or the Day of Congregation 62: [Friday is the Sabbath and no work shall be done; and, ] …

Those to whom the burden of the Torah was entrusted and yet refused to bear it are like a donkey laden with books. Wretched is the example of those who deny Allah’s revelations. Allah does not guide the wrongdoers.
Say to the Jews: ‘If your claim be true that of all men you alone are Allah’s friends, then you should wish for death!’ But, because of what their hands have done, they will never wish for death. Allah knows the wrongdoers.

[Wrongdoers will be punished, especially those that break the Sabbath (Friday) and Jews are wrong and evildoers simply because they are Jews and the Torah declares them to be the chosen ones!?! Judaism may be exclusionary, consider Sammy Davis, Jr.’s, experience with Israel, but so what? They’re not out raping, murdering and committing terrorism in the name of He Whose Name May Not Be Spoken (I am that I am). I’ve never seen any scholarly dispute over what the Torah proclaims as being the Word of God anywhere, although there are numerous synagogues with differing practices, there still has been only ONE temple and ONE God and ONE book; the issues of Resurrection, Redemption and Judgment are still being debated within the hierarchy as far as I know, still, there are the Jews for Jesus who accept His messiah-hood.]

Battle Array 61: … Allah loves those who fight for His cause in ranks as firm as a mighty edifice. … And of Jesus, who said to the Israelites: ‘I am sent forth to you by Allah to confirm the Torah already revealed and to give news of an apostle that will come after me whose name is Ahmed (Mohammed). … [Heaven and hell and wrongdoers &c.] … When Jesus the son of Mary said to the disciples: ‘Who will come with me to the help of Allah?’ they replied: ‘We are Allah’s helpers.’

[Well, here is Jesus being co-opted as an apostle to foreclaim Mohammed’s coming and that Mohammed’s coming is a fulfillment of scripture. Haven’t yet found anything supporting this in either the Bible or the Apocrypha, and especially nothing in Josephus, although, I’m not the brightest bulb in the lamp. Pretty harsh condemnation of Jews and Christians herein, though, and certainly a complete denial of gnosis and the apocrypha. Completely pulls the rug out from any possibility of ecumenicism. And, is the ‘fight in firm ranks’ the justification for taking punishment into their own hands after so many verses of ‘Allah will judge them’? Considering the fact that Mohammed spent a heckuva lot of time in the saddle killing Jews and burning down towns, is it that in historical context the Muslim is required to bathe himself in the blood of non-believers?]

Iron 57: [Lots of righteous and evil stuff, and an emphasis that to be good one must do charitable works. Rather odd since believers and atheists are statistically the stingiest of people – check the stats on the last few Tsunamis of who pledged what to relief and who actually paid; the same for famine & aids relief as well as plagues, who supports Doctors’ Without Border, The Red Cross & Crescent, &c.? Rhetorical question, actually, Islam and atheists do not support charity to even a moderate extent, although there are one or two who do, they are not representative of mainstream Islam or Socialism. Think of those emails that show the palaces & excessive conspicuous consumption of so many Arabs and then of the squalor of “their beloved people”.]

… We sent forth Noah and Abraham, and bestowed on their offspring prophet-hood and the Scriptures. Some were rightly guided, but many were evil-doers. After them We sent other apostles, and after those Jesus the son of Mary. We gave him the Gospel and put compassion and mercy in the hearts of his followers. As for monasticism, they instituted it themselves (for We had not enjoined it on them), seeking thereby to please Allah; but they did not observe it faithfully. We rewarded only those who were true believers; for many of them were evil-doers.

[Pretty much wipes out any acceptance or tolerance of Judaism or Christianity by a believer. Interesting that there’s a statement declaiming priestly celibacy here, something that I’ve not found real support for in the Bible, ditto anything forbidding ordination of women. This is a long verse whose purpose appears to be to completely remove any validity to Judaism and Christianity as well as to erase any possibility of God-head to Jesus. Wonder what the Gnostics would say to this?]

That Which is Coming 56: [The day of reckoning is coming, the good will go to paradise and be served by houris made virgin and the evil-doers will go to hell and be immensely unhappy for eternity. Apparently The End date was predetermined at Creation.]

The Moon 54: [The End is coming, be warned, We have made the Koran easy to remember, and others before you were warned and heeded it not and suffered and are in hell. I note the specific use of the word remembered and not the use of the word learned.]

The Star 53: … He does not speak out of his own fancy. This is an inspired revelation. He is taught by one who is powerful and mighty. …

[Mohammed is being instructed by the Archangel Gabriel, therefore, how can anyone doubt that this is the true revelation of Allah? Hmm, if it is the true revelation of Allah, why the intermediary or even the need for an intermediary? Remember Moses’ burning bush and Noah’s voice from the heavens? Jesus’ dealing directly with Satan and his conversation directly with Allah in the garden at Gethsemane?]

… (A list of ancient Arab Gods) They are but names which you and your fathers have invented: Allah has vested no authority in them. The unbelievers follow vain conjectures and the whims of their own souls, although the guidance of their Lord has come to them.

[Meaning the Koran is the be all and end all of revelation. More of he who does good deeds goes to heaven and unbelievers go to hell. Those who commit small sins will be shown mercy and a statement that Allah knows all of what will your choices be while you’re in the womb, clearly a statement of predestination, obviously in conflict with the verses intimating free will such as the one following {53:33} where it is declared that each shall be judged by his labours; and a claim of legitimacy by this being more of those scriptures given to Abraham and Moses.]

The Mountain 52: [The Koran is in accord with those scriptures handed down on Mt. Sinai (where God spoke directly to Moses, hmm); the good will {“… recline on couches ranged in rows. To dark eyed houris We shall wed them.
(We shall unite the true believers with those of their descendants who follow them in their faith, and shall not deny them the reward of their good works: each man is the hostage of his own deeds.) … and there shall wait on them young boys of their own as fair as virgin pearls.”} and the evil doers and nonbelievers will burn in hell. Looks like more free will and not predestination; and I haven’t found any rewards for the womenfolk, except that verse that says whole families will be admitted to Paradise on Judgement Day – does that mean a woman must be some man’s property to get into heaven?; so much for the libbers and gay rights activists and pro-choicers.]

The Winds 51: [Good deeds will be rewarded, unbelievers will be punished, and some of Noah, Abraham and Moses; Aad, Thamoud and destruction of unbelievers as recorded in the Old Testament.]

Qaf 50: [Good and evil, paradise and hell, references to Old Testament miracles of destruction to sinners {Thamoud, Aad, Lot, Ar-Raas, and Tobba} and a bit on Judgment:]

Then a voice will cry: ‘Cast into Hell every hardened unbeliever, every opponent of good works, and every doubting transgressor who has set up another god besides Allah. Hurl him into the fierce tormenting flames!’

[This is to be done at the time of judgment and it is clear that this judgment is to be made by Allah. Wonder what Khomeini, bin Laden et al make of this clear statement?]

Mohammed 47: Allah will bring to nothing to the deeds of those who disbelieve and debar others from His path. As for the faithful who do good works and believe in what is revealed to Mohammed – which is the truth from their Lord – He will forgive them their sins and ennoble their state.
This, because the unbelievers follow falsehood, while the faithful follow the truth from their Lord. Thus Allah coins their sayings for mankind.
When you meet the unbelievers in the battlefield strike off their heads and, when you have laid them low, bind your captives firmly. Then grant them their freedom or take ransom from them, until War shall lay down her armour.
Thus shall you do. Had Allah willed, He could Himself have punished them; but He has ordained it thus that He might test you, the one by the other.
As for those who are slain in the cause of Allah, He will not allow their works to perish. He will vouchsafe them guidance and ennoble their state; He will admit them to the Paradise He has made known to them.’
Believers, if you help Allah, Allah will help you and make you strong. But the unbelievers shall be consigned to perdition. He will bring their deeds to nothing. Because they have opposed His revelations, He will frustrate their works.
Have they never journeyed through the land and seen what was the end of those who have gone before them? Allah destroyed them utterly. A similar fate awaits the unbelievers, because Allah is the protector of the faithful; because the unbelievers have no protector.
Allah will admit those who embrace the true faith and do good works to gardens watered by running streams. The unbelievers take their fill of pleasure and eat as the beasts: but Hell shall be their home.
How many cities were mightier than your own city, which has cast you (Mohammed) out! We destroyed them all, and there was none to help them.
Can he who follows the guidance of his Lord be compared to him who is led by his appetites and whose foul deeds seem fair to him?
This is the Paradise which the righteous have been promised. There shall flow in it rivers of unpolluted water, and rivers of milk for ever fresh; rivers of delectable wine and rivers of clearest honey. They shall eat therein of every fruit and receive forgiveness from their Lord. Is this like the lot of those who shall abide in Hell for ever and drink scalding water which will tear their bowels?
Some of them indeed listen to you, but no sooner do they leave your presence than they ask those to whom knowledge has been given: ‘What did he say just now?’ Such are the men whose hearts are sealed by Allah and who follow their base desires.
As for those who follow the right path, Allah will increase their guidance and teach them to guard themselves against evil.
Are they waiting for the Hour of Doom to overtake them unawares? Its portents have already come. But how will they be warned when it overtakes them?
Know that there is no god but Allah. Implore Him to forgive your sins and to forgive the true believers, men and women. Allah knows your busy haunts and resting-places.
The faithful say: ‘If only a Chapter were revealed!’ But when a forthright Chapter is revealed and war is mentioned in it, you see the infirm of heart looking towards you as thought they were fainting away for fear of death. Yet obedience and courteous speech would become them more. Indeed, should war be decided upon, it would be better for them to be true to Allah.
If you (the hypocrites) renounced the Faith you would surely do evil the land and violate the ties of blood. Such are those on whom Allah has laid His curse, leaving them bereft of sight and hearing.
Those who return to unbelief after Allah’s guidance has been revealed to them are seduced by Satan and inspired by him. That is because they say to those who abhor the word of Allah: ‘We shall obey you in some matters.’ Allah knows their secret talk.
What will they do when the angels carry away their souls and strike them on their heads and backs?
That is because they follow what has incurred the wrath of Allah and abhor what pleases Him. He will surely bring their works to nothing.
Do the feeble-hearted think that Allah will not reveal their malice? If We pleased, We could point them out to you and you would recognize them promptly by their looks. But you will surely know them from the tenor of their words. Allah has knowledge of all your actions.
We shall put you to the proof until We know the valiant and the resolute among you and test all that is said about you.
The unbelievers who debar others from the path of Allah and disobey the Apostle after they have seen the light shall in no way harm Allah. He will bring their works to nothing.
Believers, obey Allah and His apostle and never let your labours go in vain.
Those that disbelieve and debar others from Allah’s path and in the end die unbelievers shall not be shown forgiveness by Allah. Therefore do not falter or sue for peace when you have gained the upper hand. Allah is on your side and will not grudge you the reward of your labours.
The life of this world is but a sport and a pastime. Allah will reward you if you believe in Him and guard yourselves against evil. He does not ask for all your wealth. If he demanded all and strongly pressed you, you would grow niggardly and this would show your ill-feelings.
You are called upon to give to the cause of Allah. Some of you are ungenerous; yet whoever is ungenerous to the cause is ungenerous to himself. Indeed, Allah does not need you, but you need Him. If you give no heed, He will replace you by others different from you.

[This is Mohammed 47 in its entirety. It is a must read for many reasons, not the least is that it is not Allah who is speaking. By leaving it whole, anyone can get the feel of the prose of The Koran. More of good works are essential to entering Paradise, again, as shown by the paucity of pledges fulfilled by the rich Arabs as well as their excessively ostentatious conspicuous consumption, who’re the true believers? Of special note herein, at the beginning, war is ennobled as Allah has ordained that believers shall be tested on the battlefield; another such point is that the hypocrites shall be known by their looks and by the fact that they will assail their brothers! Note who attacked Jordan, Indonesia, Algeria and Egypt and who goes about killing other believers with car bombs &c., and place that in context to this verse. Back to what can the likes of Khomeini and bin Laden think when they read these verses, if they ever actually do? It appears that the paragraph about those who will die in the cause of Allah will automatically go to paradise is part of the basis for terrorism, however, this verse is not from Allah, and there are quite a few verses specifically attributed to Allah that state that He will be judge and determine one’s fitness for Paradise, based on their labors and charitable works in this life. Mmm, maybe it is attributed to Allah and not Gabriel, gotta go check.]

Al-Ahqaf 46: … ‘I am no prodigy among the apostles; nor do I know what will be done with me or you. I follow only what is revealed to me, and my only duty is to give plain warning.’


[A long passage claiming heritage with the Torah and how so many have been misled. How this has been revealed in Arabic as proof of its validity seems a bit self-serving as well as contra-veritas, reasons given farther in indicate that it’s given because they’ve never had their own apostle nor been warned before – more on that below. More on unbelievers being sent to hell as well as a repeat of the definitive statement that a believer’s only duty is to give plain warning; and, those to be warned, does that mean everybody or only those in Mecca and Damascus? If the Koran is for all, then this warning is for all, only I don’t think that the Ayatollah’s believe that; only that they should be in charge, which doesn’t jive with Imrans 3. And as to not having their own apostles, that’s a historical falsehood of the blatant type.]

Kneeling 45: … We gave the scriptures to the Israelites and bestowed on them wisdom and prophethood. We provided them with good things and exalted them above the nations. We gave them plain commandments: yet it was not till knowledge had been vouchsafed them that they disagreed among themselves from evil motives. On the Day of Resurrection your Lord Himself will judge their differences.
And now We have set you on the right path. Follow it and do not yield to the lust of ignorant men; for they can in no way protect you from the wrath of Allah. The wrong-doers are patrons to each other; but the righteous have Allah Himself for their patron.

[More anti-Semitism and quite a bit of declamation on who’s going to paradise and hell; interesting that here the recital states that Jews hadn’t disagreed amongst themselves until the Proof. There are more sects of Judaism than there are of Christianity as far as I can tell. In Jesus’ time there were Sadducees, Essenes, Pharisees, Philistines, Baptists, &c. Some historians think that Jesus’ life was fully recorded as from the time of his Bar Mitzvah, or when he became an adult, about age 13, he left his family and lived with the Essenes who taught him to read and write as well as scripture. From them he went to John the Baptist for further education and then after meditating, he began his ministry; that the phrase ‘around thirty’ was not a definitive age mark but similar to the contemporary, ‘over twenty-one’, meaning of legal age or of having reached adulthood as opposed to legally of age (13). Other historians are putting forth that it’s a possibility that Jesus went to Tibet and learned Gnostic mysticism from the Hindu gurus. Also, that the fact that he wrote nothing, is meaningless in light of his being an apocalyptic messiah, so that writing anything down was meaningless as His death marked the beginning and the end (the Alpha and Omega – ά and ώ ), more properly the covenant’s final end and a new everlasting covenant’s beginning, in and of itself, thus not requiring explanation or new scripture.]

Houd 11: [Good and evil, those who deny the veracity of the Koran are evil doers, then long on Noah, and Old Testament attachment, ending with a touch of anti-Semitism and that Allah is only temporarily withholding punishment to Jews and others who would lead you astray.]

Thunder 13: … The unbelievers ask: ‘Why has no sign been given him by his Lord?’ But your mission is only to give warning. Every nation has its mentor. …
Allah does not change a people’s lot unless they change what is in their hearts. …
Truly, none will take heed but the wise: those who keep faith with Allah and do not break their pledge; who join together what He has bidden to be united; who fear their Lord and dread the terrors of Judgement-day; who for the sake of Allah endure with fortitude, attend to their prayers, and give alms in private and in public; and who ward off evil with good. These shall have a blissful end. They shall enter the Gardens of Eden, together with the righteous among their fathers, their wives, and their descendants. From every gate the angels will come to them, saying: ‘Peace be to you for all that you have steadfastly endured. Blessed is the reward of Paradise.’

[Who’s going to Paradise and who’s not and a list of things to say to the unbeliever who questions the believer. Free Will is implicit in the statement, “Allah does not change a people’s lot unless they change what is in their hearts.” This is a recurrent theme and device for learning of Allah’s will and for self-justification. This verse includes that wives will enter Paradise, thus granting women souls, but apparently, only if they are someone’s wife. Wonder what the libbers think of this, if any have even read the Koran? Also, that there are many Gardens in Paradise, and I have yet to notice why; when did Dante write his trilogy? Nine circles of Hell, nine of purgatory and nine of Heaven, if memory serves me correctly.]

Smoke 44: [There is but one God and His promise of Resurrection, and that’s the Truth and the belief. A bit on Old Testament retribution to those who held the Israelites in bondage and destruction to Tobba and others.]

[In its entirety:]

Ornaments of Gold 43:
In the Name of Allah, the Compassionate, the Merciful
HA min. By the Glorious Book! We have revealed the Koran in the Arabic tongue that you may grasp its meaning. It is a transcript of Our eternal book, sublime, and full of wisdom.
Should We ignore you because you are a sinful nation? Many a prophet did We send forth to the ancients: but they scoffed at each prophet that arose amongst them. We utterly destroyed them, though they were mightier than these (the Meccans).
Such then, is the example of the ancients. Yet, if you ask them (the Meccans) who created the heavens and the earth, they are bound to answer: ‘The Almighty, the All-knowing, created them.’
It is He who has made the earth a resting-place for you and traced out routes upon it that you may find your way; who sends down water from the sky in due measure and thereby quickens the dead land (even thus you shall be raised to life); who has created all living things in pairs and made for you the ships and beasts on which you ride, so that, as you mount upon their backs, you may recall the goodness of your Lord and say: ‘Glory to Him who has subjected these to us. But for Him we could not be their masters. To our Lord we shall all return.’
Yet they assign to Him offspring from among His servants! Surely man is monstrously ungrateful. Would Allah choose daughters for Himself and sons for you?’ (NOTE: The pagan Arabs believed that the angels, and their own goddesses, were daughters of Allah.)
Yet when the birth of a daughter is announced to one of them (NOTE: The pagan Arabs believed that the angels, and their own goddesses, were daughters of Allah.) his face darkens and he is filled with gloom. Would they ascribe to Allah females who adorn themselves with trinkets and are powerless in disputation?
They regard as females the angels who are Allah’s servants. Did they witness their creation? Their claims shall be noted down. They shall be closely questioned.
They say: ‘Had it been Allah’s will, we should never have worshipped them.’ Surely of this they have no knowledge: they are lying.
Have We given them a scripture before this, so that they should hold fast to it?
They say: ‘This was the faith our fathers practiced. We are merely walking in their footsteps.’
Thus, whenever, before you, We sent an apostle to warn a nation, those who lived in comfort said: ‘This was the faith our fathers practiced; we are merely walking in their footsteps.’
Each apostle said: ‘What if I bring you a religion more enlightened than your fathers’?’ But they replied: ‘We deny the message you have brought.’ So We took vengeance on them. Consider the fate of those who disbelieved Our warning.
Tell of Abraham, who said to his father and to his people: ‘I renounce your gods except Him who created me, for He will rightly guide me.’ He made this an abiding precept among his descendants, so that they might turn to none but Allah.
I allowed these men and their fathers to live in comfort until there came to them the truth and an apostle giving them guidance. But now that the truth has come to them, they say: ‘It is witchcraft. We will not believe in it.’ They also say: ‘Why was this Koran not revealed to some mighty man from the two towns? (Mecca and Medina)
Are they the distributors of your Lord’s blessings? It is We who deal out to them their livelihoods in this world, exalting some in rank above others, so that the one may take the other into his service. Better is your Lord’s mercy than all their hoarded treasures.
But for the fear that all mankind might have become one race of unbelievers, We would have given those who deny the Lord of Mercy dwellings with silver roofs, and gates and stairs of silver; silver couches to recline upon and ornaments of gold: for all these are but the fleeting comforts of this life. It is the life to come that Allah reserves for those who fear Him.
He that does not heed the warning of the Merciful shall have a devil for his companion (devils turn men away from the right path, though they may think themselves rightly guided). And when he comes before Us, he shall say (to his companion): ‘Would that we were as far apart as the east is from the west.’ Truly, Satan is an evil companion.
But because you have done wrong, that others will share your punishment will not avail you on that day.
You cannot make the deaf hear, nor can you guide the blind or those who are in gross error. Whether We take you hence or let you live to see Our threats fulfilled, We shall surely take vengeance on them: for We have absolute power over them.
Therefore hold fast to that which is revealed to you: you are on the right path. It is an admonition to you and to your people. You shall be questioned all.
Ask those of Our apostles whom We sent before you if We ever appointed gods to be worshipped besides Allah.
We sent forth Moses with Our signs to Pharaoh and his nobles. He said: ‘I am the apostle of the Lord of the Creation.’ But when he showed them Our signs they laughed at them: yet each fresh sign We revealed to them was mightier than the one that came before it. Therefore We let loose Our scourge upon them, so that they might return to the right path.
‘Magician,’ they said, ‘pray to your Lord for us and invoke the promise He has made you. We accept your guidance.’
But when We had relieved their affliction they broke their pledge.
Pharaoh made a proclamation among his people. ‘My people,’ said he, ‘is the kingdom of Egypt not mine, and are these rivers which flow at my feet not mine also? Can you not see? Am I not mightier than this despicable wretch, who can scarcely make his meaning plain? Why have no bracelets of gold been given him, or angels went down with him?’
Thus he incited his people. They obeyed him, for they were degenerate men. And when they provoked Us, We took vengeance on them and drowned them all, as a lesson and an example to those who succeeded them.
When Mary’s son is cited as an instance, your people laugh and say: ‘Is he better than our own gods”’ They cite him to you merely to provoke you. Truly, they are a contentious nation.
Jesus was no more than a mortal whom We favoured and made an example to the Israelites. Had it been Our will We could have replaced you with angels to succeed you on the earth. He is a portent of the Hour of Doom. Have no doubt about its coming and follow Me. This is the right path: let Satan not mislead you, for he is your sworn enemy.
And when Jesus worked his miracles, he said: ‘I have to give you wisdom and to make plain to you some of the things about which you differ. Fear Allah and follow me. Allah is my Lord and your Lord: therefore serve Him. That is the right path.’
Yet the factions disagreed among themselves. But when the Day of Judgement comes, woe to the wrongdoers, for they shall be sternly punished.
Are they waiting for the Hour of Doom to overtake them unawares, without warning? On that day friends shall become enemies, except the God-fearing.
But you, My servants, who have believed in My revelations and surrendered yourselves, shall on that day have nothing to fear or to regret. Enter Paradise, you and your spouses, in all delight. You shall be served with golden dishes and golden cups. Abiding there for ever, you shall find all that your souls desire and all that your eyes rejoice in.
Such is the Paradise you shall inherit by virtue of your good deeds. Your sustenance shall be abundant fruit.
But the evil-doers shall endure for ever the torment of Hell. Their punishment will never be lightened and they shall be speechless with despair We do not wrong them, but they wrong themselves.
‘Malek,’ (one of the keepers of Hell) they will call out, ‘ let your Lord make an end of us!’ But he will answer: ‘Here you shall remain!’
We have made known to you the truth, but most of you abhor the truth.
If they (the Christians) are resolved to ruin you (Mohammed), We are resolved to ruin them. Do they think We cannot hear their secret talk, and private converse? Yes! Our angels, who are at their side, record it all.
Say (to the Christians): ‘If the Lord of Mercy had a son, I would be the first to worship him.’
Exalted be the Lord of the heavens and the earth, the Lord of the Throne, above their falsehoods! Let them blunder, let them play, until they fact the day with which they are threatened.
He is God in heaven and God on earth; He is the Wise One, the All-knowing. Blessed be He to whom belongs the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and all that lies between the! He alone has knowledge of the Hour of Doom. To Him you shall all return.
The gods to whom they pray besides Him have not the power to intercede for them. None can intercede for them save him who knows the truth and testifies to it.
Yet if you ask them who created them, they will promptly reply that it was Allah. How then can they turn away from Him?
The Apostle says: ‘Lord, these men are unbelievers.’
Bear with them and with them peace. They shall before long know their error.

[I’ve edited Ornaments of Gold not at all. My original notes cannot do this passage justice when seen in the light of a treatise for others. The language and prose used here give more flavor and does more justice to the beauty of the Koran while at the same time leaving intact the meaning as best translated by Professor Dawood. I’ve removed all of my color codes from it as well so that the reader may make his own judgments and come to his own conclusions as to the intent of current Muslims towards the rest of us. I have entered Professor Dawood’s footnotes in green at the appropriate junctures for clarity of meaning, only. ‘course, some of the meaning seems pretty obvious to me!]

Counsel 42: [This passage should also be read in its entirety. Within it are points noting (i) that women are given you so that you may multiply; (ii) all creation is Allah’s as well as all before and after; & (iii) resurrection of the dead will occur. Some of what is in here intimates that women are mere broodmares and that Christians and Jews are evil because they are trying to mislead the true believers with lies and misguidance. It also gives the reason for an Arabic Koran as so they may warn the mother city, Mecca, and those who dwell around it, of judgment day. Kind of restrictive, that, why not a Chinese Koran so that the most populace land may be warned, or have several apostles so that all may be warned. In The New Testament the Holy Ghost grants the gift of tongues to Jesus’ disciples so that they may go throughout the lands and spread the Good Word (Gospel means the good word in Greek). Having done that once, why not do it again? And, didn’t several of The Apostles head East to spread the good news? Or is The New Testament to be denied in its entirety by Islam?]

Revelations Well Expounded 41: [Another passage of God is great, benignant, merciful and then more of Old Testament retribution. It’s an Arabic Koran because the apostle is Arab. The Torah was Jewish because it was for the Jews who immediately disagreed about it. When judgment day comes, all will acknowledge Allah, but will deny all of their false idols, whom they had previously worshipped. More of the same.]

The Forgiving One 40: …
There is no god but Him. All shall return to Him. None but the unbelievers dispute the revelations of Allah. Do not be deceived by their prosperous dealings in the land. Long before them the people of Noah denied Our revelations, and so did the factions after them. Every nation strove to kill their apostle, seeking with false arguments to refute the truth; but when I smote them, how stern was My punishment! Thus the word of your Lord shall be fulfilled concerning the unbelievers: they are the heirs of Hell.

But to the unbelievers a voice will cry: ‘Allah’s abhorrence of you is greater than your hatred of yourselves. You were called to the Faith, but you denied it.’

[The End is coming and with it judgment. Believers are believers and will attain Allah’s blessing. Everybody else will be punished. Repeat of Pharaoh and a list of what happened to those who did not believe, who did not listen to their apostles, who altered the meaning of what their apostles gave them at Allah’s command. Some of this reads as, ‘for those who do not study history, they are doomed to repeat it.’ It’s a recurring theme that all those who have denied Allah and His Apostles in the past have come to bad endings. There’s been The Flood, destruction of various cities and peoples, Pharaoh’s disasters on Egypt, &c.]

The Ranks 37: …
You marvel, while they scoff. When they are warned they take no warning. When they are shown a sign they mock at it and say: ‘This is plain magic. What! When we are dead and turned to dust and bones, shall we be raised to life, we and our forefathers?’
Say: ‘Yes. And you shall be held to shame.’
One blast will sound and they shall see the Resurrection. ‘Woe to us!’ they will exclaim. ‘This is the Day of Reckoning. This is the Judgement-day which you denied.’

[Why hate Christianity? Here, as elsewhere, the root of Christianity is the root of Islam: there is one preset judgment day coming and then all will be bodily resurrected and judged. In Christianity, the body will be beatified and there is no reference of that so far. My assumption from this reading is that the Muslim will be given a body reflecting his spirituality as determined by his labors and charity in this life, but I certainly cannot know without an epiphany. Also, those judged for Hell will eat Zaqqum fruit and drink boiling water. Should re-read for meditation.]

Ya Sin 36: …
It is We who will bring back the dead to life. We record the deeds of men and the marks they leave behind: We note all things in a glorious book. …
On that day no soul shall suffer the least injustice. You shall be rewarded according only to your deeds.
On that day the dwellers of Paradise shall think of nothing but their bliss. Together with their wives, they shall recline in shady groves upon soft couches. They shall have fruits and all that they desire.

[More on heaven and hell, but more importantly, there will be a bodily resurrection and all shall be judged on their deeds. Hmm. Also, note how the only way for a women to enter paradise is as someone’s wife!]

The Creator 35: …
The unbelievers shall be sternly punished, but those that accept the true faith and do good works shall be forgiven and richly rewarded. …
Those who recite the Book of Allah and attend to their prayers and give alms in private and in public may hope for imperishable gain. Allah will give them their rewards and enrich them from His won abundance. He is forgiving and bountiful in His rewards.
What We have revealed to you in the Book is the truth confirming previous scriptures. Allah knows and observes His servants.
We have bestowed the Book on those of Our servants whom We have chosen. Some of them sin against their souls, some follow a middle course, and some, by Allah’s leave, vie with each other in charitable works: this is the supreme virtue.
They shall enter the gardens of Eden, where they shall be decked with pearls and bracelets of gold, and arrayed in robes of silk. They shall say: ‘Praise be to Allah who has taken away all our sorrows from us. Our Lord is forgiving and bountiful in His rewards. Through His grace He has admitted us to the Eternal Mansion, where we shall know no toil, no weariness.’
As for the unbelievers, the fire of Hell awaits them. Death shall not deliver them, nor shall its torments be ever lightened for them. Thus shall the thankless be rewarded.

Allah knows the mysteries of heaven and earth. He knows the hidden thoughts of me.

[The end is near, &c. Quite a few of these sections are repeated throughout the Koran and I can’t tell if it’s because Mohammed is addressing different audiences, to whom this would not be redundant, or if he’s trying to beat these points into the same group who can’t seem to get it right. Much of the references to the Old Testament and the New Testament make that point: that over and over again apostles have been sent to man to reveal the truth but man keeps screwing up and some day, a preset day of doom and judgment, every individual will have to answer for his behavior to everyone else and that the only way to Paradise, which appears to be a specific part of heaven or the heavens – wonder if hell is a part of “the heavens”, makes sense, doesn’t it? – is to believe and do good works. There still seems to be a tie between predestination and free will as to which applies, here as well as a stressing of Doom and Resurrection of the Body.]

Sheba 34: … He is the Forgiving One, the Merciful. [The unbelievers say that there is no doomsday nor resurrection, so we’ll retell the tale of David, Solomon and the nation of Sheba and some other stuff not too different from the Old Testament. Then comes:]
Satan had judged them rightly; they followed him all, except for a band of true believers. Yet he had no power over them: Our only aim was to know those who believed in the life to come and those who were in doubt about it. Your Lord takes cognizance of all things.

The unbelievers say: ‘We will never believe in this Koran, nor in the Scriptures which came before it.’

We have sent no apostle to any nation whose message was not denied by those of them that lived in comfort. The unbelievers say: ‘We have been given more wealth and children that the faithful. Surely we shall never be punished.’

Neither your riches nor your children shall bring you a jot nearer to Us. Those that have faith and do what is right shall be doubly rewarded for their deeds: they shall dwell in peace in the pavilions of Paradise. But those that strive to confute our revelations shall be brought for punishment.

[Aside from the recurring evil doers being bound in chains and punished, free will rears its head again as well as a comment that the wealthy and powerful have always denied the apostles that Allah has sent in the past and the Word that they bring. Seems to be quite accurate including the Golden Calf that was raised up when Moses went onto Mt. Sinai. Most of the old prophets in the Old Testament were denied either at the time that they prophesied or shortly thereafter, thus breaking the covenants of the Lord for which they were duly punished, then another covenant another break &c. With the Christian claims of Jesus being the final covenant, does that mean we shift from a communal responsibility to an individual one? From group accountability to individual free will? Then there’s that line that implies that unbelievers are also those that do not believe in the scriptures that came before the Koran, how does THAT fit into current Islamic philosophy? Old Testament retribution was visited upon whole communities, old and young alike. In the Old Testament the sins of the father are passed onto the children for fifty generations; but, the New Testament ends that with the sins of the father shall not be passed on. It’s difficult to accept that new-borns should be cast into hell for the sins of their fathers unless the responsibility was communal, which is what it appears. This would account for the continued covenant, break covenant of the Old Testament and Jesus’ Messiah-hood as being the last covenant because responsibility for one’s behavior shifted from the community to self. The requirement of believing the prior scriptures seems to be irrelevant to current Islamic practice.]

Adoration 32: … It (the Koran) is the truth from your Lord, which He has bestowed upon you so that you may forewarn a nation, whom none has warned before you, and that they may be rightly guided. …
He governs the creation from heaven to earth. And in the end it will ascend to Him in one day, a day whose space is a thousand years by your reckoning. …
Those that have faith and do good works shall be received in the gardens of Paradise, as a reward for that which they have done. But those that do evil shall be cast into the Fire. Whenever they try to get out of Hell they shall be driven back, and a voice will say to them: ‘Taste the torment of Hell-fire, which you have persistently denied.’
But We will inflict on them the lighter punishment of this world before the supreme punishment of the world to come, so that they may return to the right path. And who is more wicked than the man who gives no heed to the revelations of his Lord when he is reminded of them? We will surely take vengeance on the evil-doers.
We gave the Scriptures to Moses (never doubt that you will meet him) and made it a guide for the Israelites. And when they grew steadfast and firmly believed in Our revelations, We appointed leaders from among them who gave guidance at Our bidding. On the Day of Resurrection your Lord will resolve for them their differences.
Do they not know how many generations We have destroyed before the? They walk among their ruined dwellings. Surely in this there are veritable signs. Have they no ears to hear with?
Do they not see how We drive the rain to the parched lands and bring forth crops of which they and their cattle eat? Have they no eyes to see with?

[The evil are going to hell and the righteous to Paradise. Apparently, none of Jesus’ disciples ever got this far East, because this verse opens with ‘no apostle has come to warn you’, which seems to be historically off since we know that not only that they did, but they (this nation) have complete access to both the Old Testament and the New Testament simply because Mohammed keeps referring to it throughout. To be righteous means that you must have faith and do good works. Ok, so far, having faith means accepting Allah, the God of Moses, so Yahweh qualifies, as does God as referenced in the New Testament, His word, which so far means revelation, resurrection, free will (maybe), acceptance of His overlordship and doing good works, meaning charity in all of its forms; so, how do Jews and Christians not qualify for Paradise? Allah is the same God of Jews and Christians according to this and the Creator is referenced in the singular in many religions, Hindi for one (the “sub-gods” are manifestations of the One God, if I’ve read the B-G correctly), good works towards the people within ones’ culture is a requirement in most of them, including the pre-Columbian West, so, why the intense hostility towards Jews and Christians?]

Luqman 31: (Luqman, a sage who, we are told, was a grandson of a sister or an aunt of Job.) [@ 31:15 the Faithful are admonished to, “Be kind to them in this world, and turn to Me with devotion.” them being unbelievers. There’s a lot of how to pray and what Allah has done and will do and to avoid idolatry and the evil will be punished but the faithful will achieve Allah’s promise of Paradise.]

The Greeks 30: [The Greeks got beaten by the Persians in 615 C.E. but will soon be granted the victory, Allah willing. Don’t know why this is referenced herein.] …

They care for the outward show of this life, but of the life to come they are heedless. Have they not considered that Allah created the heavens and the earth and all that lies between them for a worthy end, to last for an appointed term? Yet most men deny that they will ever meet their Lord. …

[More about believers and unbelievers; but more importantly, a continued emphasis on resurrection and it looks like redemption, as well.]

The Spider 29: Do men think that once they say: ‘We are believers’, they will be left alone and not be tried with affliction?
We put to the proof those who have gone before them. Allah knows those who are truthful and those who are lying.
Or do the evil-doers think that they will escape Our punishment? How ill they judge!
He that hopes to meet his Lord must know that Allah’s appointed hour is sure to come. He alone hears all and knows all.
He that fights for Allah’s cause fights for himself. Allah does not need His creatures’ help. As for those that have faith and do good works, We shall cleanse them of their sins and reward them according to their noblest deeds.

[More Abraham and Noah; the people were sinful and We sent the sign, meaning the flood; “… An apostle’s duty is but to give plain warning.” There will be Resurrection and on that day the sinners will be woe-filled; Old Testament retribution (Lot, &c.). Idolatry and unbelief are like the spider’s web, the frailest of all dwellings and when doomsday gets here, and it surely will, y’all will find out that I’m not a joke, nor are Resurrection and Judgement! This book (the Koran) is the sure sign of Allah’s Word and Revelation. Conflicting statement in the line, He that fights for Allah’s cause fights for himself. Allah does not need his creatures’ help. Dontcha think? Justification for violence & conversion by the sword, or are we back to Allah will do all the judging and punishing your job is to warn everyone that judgement is coming and nothing else.]

The Poets 26: [Moses and Pharaoh and the scourge of Egypt; that these were surely signs of Allah’s power and Moses sanctity; Poets are liars and are followed only by erring men.]

Al-Furqan (“The distinction between right and wrong; also one of the names of the Koran.” The word has puzzled Muslim commentators, but, clearly, it is identical with the Aramaic porqan (salvation), in the Jewish Qaddish.) [Apparently a bunch of people claimed that Mohammed is a false prophet because Allah hasn’t given him a garden for sustenance and an angel for support, to which this response says, “no need, I (Allah) have sent him and that is surely enough.” Evil doers will wish that they had walked in the Apostle’s path – maybe this is why the Sayings of Mohammed and the Life of Mohammed are necessary parts of Islam; one must follow in the Apostle’s path to attain Paradise, so, since Mohammed broke promises and treaties &c., this is how the True Believer must behave? Revelation of the Word shall be gradually; more Moses, Aaron, Noah, Thamoud and Aad, unbelievers, &c. and ends with:]


The true servants of the Merciful are those who walk humbly on the earth and say: ‘Peace!’ to the ignorant who accost them; who pass the night standing and on their knees in adoration of their Lord; who say: ‘Lord, ward off from us the punishment of Hell, for its punishment is everlasting: an evil dwelling and an evil resting-place’; who are neither extravagant nor niggardly but keep the golden mean; who invoke no other god besides Allah and do not kill except for a just cause (manslaughter is forbidden by Him); who do not commit adultery (he that does this shall meet with evil: his punishment shall be doubled on the Day of Resurrection and in disgrace he shall abide for ever – unless he repent and believe and do good works, for then Allah will change his sins to good actions: Allah is forgiving and merciful: he that repents and does good works truly returns to Allah); who do not bear false witness and do not lose their dignity when listening to profane abuse; who do not turn a blind eye and a deaf ear to the revelations of their Lord when they are reminded of them; who say: ‘Lord give us joy in our wives and children and make us examples to those who fear you.’ These shall be rewarded with Paradise for their fortitude. There they shall bind a welcome and a greeting, and there they shall abide for ever: a blessed dwelling and a blessed resting-place.
Say to the unbelievers: ‘Little cares my Lord if you do not invoke Him. Now that you have denied His revelations His punishment is bound to overtake you.’

[Quite similar to the Ten Commandments, which, given the claims that the earlier scripture is Holy Scripture and from the same source, I think that many of these verses subsume earlier admonitions and laws, or, rather, incorporate by reference those earlier statements, which means that Islam included all or at least those strictures referenced, into itself. So why the Anti-Semitism and Anti-Christian rants? Interesting that adulterers shall get double punishment, wonder if this has anything to do with the scandal surrounding his wife, Aisha; and how do all those Muslims who came to the U.S. to attend college get around the admonition to not enter into idolaters and unbelievers, collectively, “the unclean”, then claim marital rights of them and divorce them while stealing their kids when they flee to Arabia? Can’t get a divorce if you didn’t get married, can you? Or has Islam some special deal not available to others?]

Light 24: We have revealed this Chapter and sanctioned it, proclaiming in it clear revelations, so that you may take heed.
The adulterer and adulteress shall each be given a hundred lashes. Let no pity for them cause you to disobey Allah, if you truly believe in Allah and the Last Day; and let their punishment be witnessed by a number of believers.
The adulterer may marry only an adulteress or an idolatress; and the adulteress may marry only an adulterer or an idolater. True believers are forbidden such marriages.
Those that defame honourable women and cannot produce four witnesses shall be given eighty lashes. No testimony of theirs shall be admissible, for they are great transgressors – except those among them that afterwards repent and mend their ways Allah is forgiving and merciful.
If a man accuses his wife but has no witnesses except himself, he shall swear four times by Allah that his charge is true, calling down upon himself the curse of Allah if he is lying. But if his wife swears four times by Allah that his charge is false and calls down His curse upon herself if it be true, she shall receive no punishment.
But for Allah’s grace and mercy, His wisdom and forgiveness, this would never have been revealed to you.
Those who invented that slander (The reference is to the scandal involving Mohammed’s wife Aisha with Safwan ibn-el-Moattel.) were a number of your own people. Do not regard it as a misfortune, for it has proved an advantage. Each one of them shall be punished according to his crime. As for him who had the greater in it, his punishment shall be terrible indeed.
When you heard it, why did the faithful, men and women, not think well of their own people, and say: ‘This is an evident falsehood’? Why did they not produce four witnesses? If they could not produce any witnesses, then they were surely lying in the sight of Allah.’

Those who defame honourable but careless believing women shall be cursed in this world and in the next. Theirs shall be a woeful punishment on the day when their own tongues, hand, and fee will testify to what they did. On that day Allah will justly requite them. They shall know that Allah is the Glorious Truth.
Unclean women are for unclean men, and unclean men for unclean women. But good women are for good men, and good men for good women. These shall be cleared of calumny; they shall be shown forgiveness, and a generous provision shall be made for them.

[Quite a bit more about right and wrong, punishment, repentance &c until the end of 24. Given the number of Arab men who attended college in the U.S. and “married” so many Christian American women, and siring children, it makes one wonder who all those idolatresses are that the Koran keeps referring to. Normally, in context, the idolaters include Christians, but if they are unclean or an idolatress, then they are unfit for marriage to a true believer, yes? And farther in, Light says that if you cannot afford to marry, then you shouldn’t, also some about women should turn their eyes from temptation and avoid wearing trinkets in the open &c.
The reference to Aisha seems to be that she was accused of adultery but that there was never any proof, but a heckuvalota talk. Certain verses, such as this one, appear at precisely the moment in Mohammed’s life when some occurrence and its implication, usually negative, needs either to be deflected or “explained in the light of the will of Allah;” coincidental or truly the will of Allah as written in the “big book” that’s kept in Heaven?]

The Believers 23: Blessed are the believers, who are humble in their prayers; who avoid profane talk, and give alms to the destitute; who restrain their carnal desires (except with their wives and slave-girls, for these are lawful to them) and do not trangress (sic) through lusting after other women; who are true to their trusts and promises and never neglect their prayers. These are the heirs of Paradise; they shall abide in it for ever.

You shall surely die hereafter, and be restored to life on the Day of Resurrection. We have created seven heavens above you; of Our creation We are never heedless.

[Noah, the elders didn’t believe him, so we ‘swept them away like withered leaves.’ More generations of man, Moses and Aaron, we smited Egypt, and gave man the Torah, then Mary’s son ‘as a sign to mankind and gave them a shelter on a peaceful hill-side watered by a fresh spring.’ – Aside from the polygamy and holy acceptance of slavery, this is little different from the Christian promise of Life after Death and an attachment to both the Old Testament and the New Testament as foundations for the Koran.]

Apostles! Eat of that which is wholesome and do good works: I have knowledge of all your actions. Your religion is but one religion, and I am your only Lord: therefore fear Me.
Yet men have divided themselves into different sects, each rejoicing in its own doctrines. Leave them in their error till death overtakes them.

Those who walk in fear of their Lord; who believe in the revelations of their Lord; who worship none besides their Lord; who give alms with their hearts filled with awe, knowing that they will return to their Lord; these vie with each other for salvation and are the first to attain it.

Was anything revealed to them that had not been revealed to their forefathers?

[Ok, sectarianism is bad, everybody knows that, and the prior revelations are all in the Old Testament and the New Testament, but everyone except Mohammed has misinterpreted them except the parts about redemption and bodily resurrection; but then comes the ‘live and let live’ part. “Leave them in their error till death overtakes them.” So far, this is about half way through, I haven’t found but one part allowing for any form of Islamo-Fascism-Jihad. Just that section where the faithful will be tested on the battlefield, which could just as easily be taken metaphorically as literally, i.e. life is the field of conflict and the test is to leave the unbelievers to Allah; to do good works; to pray properly; and the two golden rules: Love thy neighbor as you love thyself {and thy God} & Do unto others as you would have them do unto you! The Believers does two major things that I can see: 1. There is but one God who has sent you many revelations that you have misinterpreted, so this time you’d better get it right; & 2. In order to get it right, you’ve basically got to follow the two golden rules. It says a lot of other things as well, but those two seem to be the hardest hit throughout the Koran so far.]

Ta Ha 20: [Moses, Aaron and Egypt; Adam and Satan; pretty much a recital of the Old Testament stories with little variation from Genesis & Deuteronomy but shrunk down to about 2,400 words with the admonition that unbelievers are really, really going to suffer and that the Q’Ran is the true revelation.]

The Night Journey 17: [Covenants made; covenants broken, ye are Noah’s descendants, &c. as a recital of Hebraic history is being made to show the Allah rewards good works but punishes sinners, but first He warns everyone that they’re sinning so that they have a chance to repent. 17:6 “We said: ‘If you do good, it shall be to your own advantage; but if you do evil, you shall sin against your own souls.’” Certain commandments are laid out, similar to The Ten Commandments given to Moses:]

Serve no other gods besides Allah, lest you incur disgrace and ruin. Your Lord has enjoined you to worship none but Him, and to show kindness to your parents. If either or both of them attain old age in your dwelling, show them no sign of impatience, nor rebuke them; but speak to them kind words. Treat them with humility and tenderness and say: ‘Lord, be merciful to them. They nursed me when I was an infant.’ …
Give to the near of kin their due, and also to the destitute and to the wayfarers. Do not squander your substance wastefully, for the wasteful are Satan’s brothers; and Satan is ever ungrateful to his Lord. But if, while waiting for your Lord’s bounty, you lack the means to assist them, then at least speak to them kindly.
Be neither miserly nor prodigal, for then you should either be reproached or be reduced to penury. …
You shall not kill your children for fear of want (Allusion to the pre-Islamic custom of burying alive unwanted newborn girls). We will provide for them and for you. To kill them is a great sin.
You shall not commit adultery, for it is foul and indecent.
You shall not kill any man whom Allah has forbidden you to kill, except for a just cause. If a man is slain unjustly, his heir is entitled to satisfaction. But let him not carry his vengeance too far, for his victim will in turn be assisted and avenged.
Do not interfere with the property of orphans except with the best of motives, until they reach maturity. Keep your promises; you are accountable for all that you promise.
Give full measure, when you measure, and weigh with even scales. That is fair, and better in the end.
Do not follow what you do not know. Man’s eyes, ears, and heart – each of his senses shall be closely questioned.
Do not walk proudly on the earth. You cannot cleave the earth, nor can you rival the mountains in stature.
All this is evil; odious in the sight of your Lord.

These injunctions are but a part of the wisdom with which your Lord has inspired you (Mohammed). Serve no other god besides Allah, lest you should be cast into Hell, despised and helpless.

We have made plain Our revelations in this Koran so that the unbelievers may take warning. Yet it has only added to their unbelief. Say: ‘If, as you affirm, there were other gods besides Allah, they would surely seek to dethrone Him.’

[More on how to behave, then a section on unbelievers and ‘saint’ worshippers going to hell, Resurrection and Judgement, Unbelievers will try and try and try to sway you from the path of righteousness, &c. The Koran IS the Word of God, Moses & Pharaoh]

We have revealed the Koran with the truth, and with the truth it has come down. We have sent you forth only to proclaim good news and to give warning.
We have divided the Koran into sections so that you may recite it to the people with deliberation. We have imparted it by gradual revelation.

[Back to: it’s not up to you to chastise the unbeliever. Still, more on how to behave makes me wonder how all those Oil Sheiks can be as they are? Ostentatious living, formicating in Monaco, gambling/ wasteful behavior, not keeping their pledges to disaster relief, and to see the Arab world, it’s obvious that the rich don’t give much to charity – why is it that the United States has the honor to be the most charitable people, yet we’re the most hated? So far, it’s obvious that no one in al-Qaeda can possibly have read this stuff, or if they have, believe it. Blowing up babies in car bombs just to kill other Muslims and the ‘hated Satan’s troops’? Gotta be some answer to this further in. Maybe, this is page 243 of 443.{The answer to this is around pp 35 & 38 in verses 8 and 9.}]

Al-Hijr 15: … We created man from dry clay, from black moulded loam, and before him Satan from smokeless fire. Your Lord said to the angels: ‘I am creating man from dry clay, from black moulded loam. When I have fashioned him and breathed of My spirit into him, kneel down and prostrate yourselves before him.’
All the angels prostrated themselves, except Satan. He refused to prostrate himself.
‘Satan,’ said Allah, ‘why do you not prostrate yourself?’
He replied: ‘I will not bow to a mortal created of dry clay, of black moulded loam.’
‘Begone,’ said Allah, ‘you are accursed. My curse shall be on you till Judgement-day.’
‘Lord,’ said Satan, ‘reprieve me till the Day of Resurrection.’
He answered: ‘You are reprieved till the Appointed Day.’
‘Lord,’ said Satan, ‘since you have led me astray, I will seduce mankind on earth: I will seduce them all, except those that faithfully serve you.’
He replied: ‘This is the right course for Me. You shall have no power over My servants, except the sinners who follow you. They are all destined for Hell. It has seven gates, and through these they shall come in separate bands. But the righteous shall dwell amongst gardens and fountains; in peace and safety they shall enter them. We shall remove all hatred from their hearts, and they shall recline on couches face to face, a band of brothers. Toil shall not weary them, nor shall they ever leave their Paradise.’

[More Old Testament retribution, Lot & Thamoud. Interesting take on how Satan became the hated one. From this I take it that Western Civ is the great corrupter and, therefore, the Great Satan. Hard to get an entire civilization is a corrupter when it’s obvious that Satan is an individual who works on individuals. Curious now as to how the different Islamic sects, Wahabbi, Shi’a & Sunni came about. Will have to get ‘the Prophet’s Life’ and ‘the Sayings of Mohammed.’]

The Heights 7: This book is revealed to you: let your heart not be troubled about it. It is revealed to you that you may thereby warn the unbelievers and admonish the faithful.

[The story of Adam & Eve, then the as they are begging forgiveness, Revelation:]

He said, ‘Go hence, and may your descendants be enemies to each other. The earth will for a while provide your sustenance and dwelling-place. There you shall live and there shall you die, and thence you shall be raised to life.’

[Warnings about sinning and be taken in by Satan.]

Children of Adam, dress well when you attend your mosques. Eat and drink, but avoid excess. He does not love the intemperate.

[More Old Testament retribution, pride is sin, humility is favored, “Pray to your Lord with humility and in secret. He does not love the transgressors.” More Noah, a litany of apostles sent and ignored and the earthquakes and other tribulations heaped upon the unbelievers and ridiculers of them. Moses and the inscribing of the Ten Commandments; the dividing of the People into twelve tribes. Admonishment and separation of the faithful from the unbelievers, however, the Revelation of Resurrection is reinforced but of more interest, in 7:172 he releases the burden of inherited sin! “Your Lord brought forth descendants from the loins of Adam’s children, and made them testify against themselves. He said: ‘Am I not your Lord?’ They replied: ‘We bear witness that you are.’ This He did, lest you (mankind) should say on the Day of Resurrection: ‘We had no knowledge of that,’ or: ‘Our forefathers were, indeed, idolaters; but will You destroy us, their descendants, on account of what the followers of falsehood did?’ In the next paragraph, His response is that with these revelations, they may return to the right path.]

The Elephant 105: Quraysh 106: Fibre 111: [a trio of one and two liners that appear to be warnings to certain opponents, from Christians attacking Mecca in the year of his birth to the opposition presented by his uncle.]

Unity 112: Say: ‘Allah is One, the Eternal God. He begot none, nor was He begotten. None is equal to Him.’

[This is Unity 112 in its entirety, and surely, Hebraic/Christian/Hind Godhead as Creator, so why the anti-Semitism and anti-Christian ranting throughout?]

The Jinn 72: [The Jinn entered Heaven and eavesdropped, apparently with Allah’s knowledge and possibly at His will, and overheard the Revelations, at which point most swore to be His servants and some transgressed. One of the Revelations is that Allah, “has taken no wife, nor has He begotten any children. The Blaspheming One among us has uttered a wanton falsehood against Allah, although we had supposed no man or jinnee could tell of Him what is untrue”’ a Jinn is speaking and being quoted here, the quote saying Jesus was not begotten of Allah. So much for ecumenicism, throughout the rigidity of position coupled with how Christians and Jews are treated and can expect to be treated with a Muslim victory of any kind. Research on dhimmitude is included in The Heartland Plan as part of appendix A. It ain’t pretty!]

She Who is Tested 60: Believers, do not make friends with those who are enemies of Mine and yours. Would you show them kindness when they have denied the truth that has been revealed to you and driven the Apostle and yourselves out of your city because you believe in Allah, your Lord? …
If they gain ascendancy over you, they will plainly show themselves your enemies, and use their hands and tongues to harm you. They long to see you unbelievers.

[A touch of Abraham, and some of how to behave, 60:8 “Allah does not forbid you to be kind and equitable to those who have neither made war on your religion nor driven you from your homes. Allah loves the equitable. But He forbids you to make friends with those who have fought against you on account of your religion and driven you from your homes or abetted others so to do. Those that make friends with them are wrongdoers. Believers, when believing women seek refuge with you, test them. Allah best knows their faith. If you find them true believers do not return them to the infidels; they are not lawful to the infidels, nor are the infidels lawful to them. But hand back to the unbelievers the dowries they gave them. Nor is it an offence for you to marry such women, provided you give them their dowries. Do not hold on to your marriages with unbelieving women: demand the dowries you have given them and let the infidels do the same. Such is the law which Allah lays down among you. Allah is wise and all-knowing.” Somewhere in here, Mohammed made a treaty with a tribe that included a clause saying that runaways would be returned. Mohammed agreed freely to this, but when a ‘believing woman’ ran away to him, he refused to return her, thereby breaking his word. Also, how does this reconcile with the number of Muslims who in the 60’s, 70’s, and into the 80’s, while at college, married non-Muslim women only to desert them and take their children to Arabia? Who’s the transgressor here? Where’s the honor? Or is it that one does not have to have honor with the infidels? And what about, “He forbids you to make friends with t(hem)…”? Isn’t it kind of hard to have a peace with someone whose God has told him that it is forbidden to do so? Where’s our wonderful free press?]

Exile 59: … It was He that drove the unbelievers among the People of the Book out of their dwellings into the first exile (an allusion to Mohammed’s expedition against the Jews of Nadjir in Arabia). …
Had Allah not decreed exile for them He would have surely punished them in this world. But in the world to come they shall be punished in Hell-fire, because they have set themselves against Allah and His apostle; and he that sets himself against Allah should know that Allah is stern in retribution.

[A bit of tough going here, Mohammed led an expedition against the Jews of Nadhir and the Jews of Kanoika, reducing both to rubble, he then distributed the spoils amongst his people including a share to the orphans &c. There’s a jump here from the Lord shall chastise to forays against unbelievers forcing conversion by the sword or death/exile and the taking of spoils. He is also warning about false conversions to save ones worldly goods, apparently.]

She Who Pleaded 58: [If a man divorce his wife in the old pagan way (“Be to me as my mother’s back”) and then retracts, he must do penance before entering her again; then we jump to punishment of conspiring, Allah sees all and knows all, then a bit about those transgressors who do not follow the Apostle of Allah, and: “Do you see those that have befriended a people (the Jews) with whom Allah is angry? They belong neither to you nor to them. They knowingly swear to falsehoods. Allah has prepared for them a grievous scourge. Evil indeed is that which they have done. ¶ They use their faith as a disguise and debar others from the path of Allah. A shameful scourge awaits them.” The she referred to in the title is a woman who protested about being divorced in the pagan way, but why the turn to anti-Semitism here? Mohammed’s bluntly saying that Jews know that the Torah and their beliefs are false? Where’d that come from?]

The Chambers 49: [Don’t raise your voice over that of the Prophet, Allah loves those who do justice:]

If two parties of believers take up arms the one against the other, make peace between them. If either of them commits aggression against the other, fight against the aggressors till they submit to Allah’s Judgement. When they submit make peace between them in equity and justice; Allah loves those who act in justice.
The believers are a band of brothers. Make peace among your brothers and fear Allah, so that you may be shown mercy.

[Don’t spy on each other, don’t gossip, don’t defame each other, don’t use nicknames, avoid immoderate suspicion; and a point about “If you obey Allah and His apostle, He will not deny you the reward of your labours. Allah is forgiving and merciful.” ¶ The true believers are those that have faith in Allah and His apostle and never doubt; and who fight for His cause with their wealth and persons. Such are those whose faith is true.” Well, there’s the hit for war, “fight for His cause with their wealth and persons.” If Dawood’s got this all in chronological order as he claims, there’s got to be an underlying historical reason for this turn to violence or that it’s simply not apparent in the preceding verses OR, that it is so endemic and systemic that the violence is a given, much like the indiscriminate killing of female children, that placed in historical context, the audience doesn’t feel the disengagement that I do. Also, how does this square with all the Muslims in China and India selecting the sex of their children and aborting female fetuses? Where is Islam on the issue of abortion?]

Victory 48: (The taking of Mecca in 630 A.D. or of Khaybar in 629 A.D.) [Apparently war is going on all around and Mohammed is at its center. Some desert Arabs didn’t join in, all the legions of Heaven and Earth are Allah’s, swearing fealty to Mohammed is the same as fealty to the Lord, evil-doers, including those who have foresworn themselves, will be punished, and the good cherished. Mohammed is Allah’s apostle and all who follow him will be rewarded and those who don’t will be punished. A bit self-serving, methinks, as well as showing how violent, war prone and bigoted, the Prophet is.]

The Hordes 39: [Believers and unbelievers, Allah has not begotten a son, the Koran is the true book of revelation, sent specifically to the Arabs, and at the time of judgement, “In hordes the unbelievers shall be led to Hell.” Oh, well, so much for all of us non-believers.]

Sad 38: [A bit that Christianity is not monotheism, “Pay no heed and stand firm in the worship of your gods: it is a binding duty. We have not heard of this (monotheism) in the Christian Faith (the last faith). It is nothing but a false invention (monotheism). Was the word of Allah revealed to him (Mohammed) alone of all our countrymen?” So much for Christianity, too bad that Mohammed didn’t know anything about Jesus, or that both Judaism and Christianity are monotheisms, in fact, both pray to the same God, Allah, as Islam claims to. More Old Testament of Noah, Aad, Pharaoh, Thamoud, David, Solomon, Satan &c. Oh, wait, he DID know, he just chose to ignore it.]

The Confederate Tribes 33: [Now a lot becomes clear; historically, Mohammed spent a lot of time waging war and destroying infidels, meaning women and children, too. This is a bit about sharing the booty, condemning those tribes who haven’t yet been converted and a covert claim to godhead. The giveaway here is, 33:33 “Attend to your prayers, give alms to the poor, and obey Allah and His apostle.” And 33:36 “It is not for true believers – men or women – to take their choice in their affairs if Allah and His apostle decree otherwise. He that disobeys Allah and His apostle strays indeed.” There’s a lot more about being humble, accepting Mohammed’s decision on booty, how women should behave, &c. At this time Mohammed had nine wives and several slaves. He was busy laying plans for military conquest of the area and trying to increase his military might by bringing more tribes into his fold, and therefore, his army. 33:57 “Those who speak ill of Allah and His apostle shall be cursed by Allah in this life and in the life to come. He has prepared for them a shameful punishment.” Guess I’m for the high jump then. 33:73 “Allah will surely punish the hypocrites and the idolaters, both men and women; but to believing men and to believing women He shall show mercy. Allah is forgiving and merciful.” So much for Jews and Catholics, Episcopalians and Hindu, guess that where I’m going to end up is going to be filled with decent people. How can anyone who opposes slavery or equal rights follow this? Got to be for the “booty”.]

The Prophets 21: [In both the Old Testament and the New Testament, prophets, apostles and Jesus performed miracles. This opens with Mohammed reciting that he knows that the unbelievers have been saying that, well now, if Mohammed is from Allah, let him show us a sign, as did those apostles and prophets before him, of Allah’s might. Mohammed’s response is that the tales of Old Testament retribution that he’s recited over and over again, show Allah’s strength, so you’d better accept Mohammed or the retribution will be huge. Mohammed continues with Abraham and reaches into both the Old Testament and New to support his claim of apostle-hood, yet performs no miracle. More pages of Abraham, David, Solomon, Ishmael, Idris (Enoch), &c. Mary and Jesus, (21:91 “And of the woman who kept her chastity. We breathed into her of Our spirit, and made her and her son a sign to all men.”) Now, if Allah breathed His spirit into her, isn’t that a metaphor for conception? Isn’t that exactly how Garry Wills puts it in What the Gospels Meant? How’d Mohammed get that if Allah didn’t conceive Jesus as he claims so many times elsewhere and is this his reason for hating Christianity? And, if Mohammed can recite these things, how can he claim that there’ve been no apostles or knowledge of Moses and Jesus sent from the East for Arabia? 21:107 “We wrote in the Psalms (Psalm xxxvii, 29) after the Torah had been given: ‘The righteous among My servants shall inherit the earth.’ That is an admonition to those who serve Us.’ So, Arabia had been sent apostles from the East!]

The Bee 16: [Righteous and Evil, Allah created everything, and a bit about predestination, 16:37 “We raised an apostle in every nation, saying: ‘Serve Allah and avoid false gods.’ Amongst them were some whom Allah guided, and others destined to go astray. Roam the world and see what was the end of the disbelievers! So, the names of the apostles sent to Hind, Asia and Africa are … ? And, we’re back to free will around 16:65. Still, resurrection, doomsday and judgement are a constant theme, as in The Bible. A bit on atheists, 16:83 “They recognize the favours of Allah, yet they deny them. Truly, most of them are ungrateful.” In context Mohammed’s talking about the wonders of the Earth and Universe, and saying ‘how can anyone see this, and not believe?’ Pretty cogent argument for the 7th Century; my personal take on this deals with the laws of Physics and the Singularity; if the ball was in equilibrium, which is what is hypothesized by the physicists, and Newton’s laws, which pertain to the macro universe, require that things at rest stay at rest and things in motion stay in motion, what, aside from God, unbalanced the ball causing the ‘big bang’? Had to be God, there isn’t anybody else. (And this from me when I was an undergrad – Bill.) Back to predestination, 16:93 “Had Allah pleased, He would have united you into one nation. But He leaves in error whom He will and gives guidance to whom He pleases.” And back to Free Will, 16:94 “Do not take oaths to deceive each other, lest your foot should slip after being rightly guided, and lest evil should befall you for debarring others from the path of Allah: for then indeed you should incur a grievous punishment.” Apparently, Mohammed’s been caught at a ‘bait and switch’; 16:101 “When We change one verse for another (Allah knows best what He reveals), they say: ‘You (Mohammed) are an impostor.’ Indeed most of them are ignorant men.” Ok, we’re back to a claim of “we” and yet when caught in an ambiguity, Mohammed’s response is that only he can tell the what’s what of any verse at any time. Mighty self-serving, that, as is: 16:105 “None invents falsehoods save those who disbelieve the revelations of Allah: they alone are the liars.” And, the pork and canine ban: 16:115 “He has forbidden you carrion, blood, and the flesh of swine; also any flesh consecrated other than in the name of Allah. … “. So much for Kosher and Parvé, and Mohammed references these dietary laws at 16:118 with Judaism. And, we’re back to, 16:125 “If you punish, let your punishment be proportionate to the wrong that has been done you. But it shall be best for you to endure your wrongs with patience.” I can only assume that these kinds of passages have been interpreted as only as between believers, because Islam sure doesn’t apply this rule to the rest of us.]

The Spoils 8: [Warfare and the assumption of Godhead. 8:1 “They ask you about the spoils. Say: ‘The spoils (of the Battle of Badr, 624 A.D.) belong to Allah and the Apostle. Therefore have fear of Allah and end your disputes. Obey Allah and His apostle.’ And 8:5 “Your Lord bade you leave your home to fight for justice, but some of the faithful were reluctant. They argued with you about the truth that had been revealed, as though they were being led to certain death. ¶Allah promised to grant you victory over one of the two bands, but you wished to fight the one that was unarmed. (Mohammed’s plan was to attack an unarmed caravan belonging to the Quraysh of Mecca on its way from Syria to Mecca. An army of Meccans marched to its assistance. Some of the Muslims wished to attack the caravan, others the Meccan army. Mohammed’s forces, only 319 strong, routed the Meccans, who were nearly 1,000 in number.) He sought to fulfil His promise and to annihilate the unbelievers, so that Truth should triumph and falsehood be discomfited, though the wrongdoers wished otherwise.” Should I comment, or leave it for the reader to figure out? Kind of obvious, isn’t it? And

Q’Ran 8:12-15 “Allah revealed His will to the angels, saying: ‘I shall be with you. Give courage to the believers. I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, maim them in every limb!’
Thus We punished them because they defied Allah and His apostle. He that defies Allah and His apostle shall be sternly punished. We said to them: ‘Feel Our scourge. Hell-fire awaits the unbelievers.’”

[There it is, “Strike off their heads, maim them in every limb!” So much for the peace of Islam; and this is Islam’s promise to every Infidel, meaning me and mine – what about you and yours? Think that this is what they want to do to you, or do you believe Nancy Pelosi, Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton are going to do “something” about this? Bush certainly hasn’t been very successful, has he? (Time for you to go order, The Heartland Plan, isn’t it?) I wonder why the morons in the media never ask about this passage when “interviewing” Islamic spokesmen? Could it be that the idiots in the media have never read the Q’Ran? Since most have never read the U.S. Constitution or The Federalist or The Anti-Federalist or, for that matter, The Bible, why does this supposition bother me? Could it be that those in control of the media are arrogantly ignorant, or are they self-serving egocentrics? Probably both. More religious stuff about guarding oneself against temptation &c. Here’s an interesting point, and probably why Arafat’s estate, considering the guy never had a real job, exceeded $25,000,000,000: 8:40 “Know that to Allah, the Apostle, the Apostle’s kinsfolk, the orphans, the needy, and the wayfarers, shall belong one fifth of your spoils: if you truly believe in Allah and what We revealed to Our servant on the day of victory, the day when the two armies met. Allah has power over all things.” I wonder how much of a cut Mohammed kept in distributing to the orphans and needy. Wonder if Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson had this in mind when they insisted that they be the ones to distribute Katrina Hurricane Relief? Same of Pharaoh, &c., ah, militant Islam: 8:64 “Prophet, Allah is your strength and the faithful who follow you. ¶ Prophet, rouse the faithful to arms. If there are twenty steadfast men among you, they shall vanquish two hundred; and if there are a hundred, they shall rout a thousand unbelievers, for they are devoid of understanding. …¶A prophet may not take captives until he has fought and triumphed in his land. You (Mohammed’s followers) seek the chance gain of this world, but Allah desires for you the world to come. He is mighty and wise. Had there not been a previous sanction from Allah, you would have been sternly punished for what you have taken. Enjoy, therefore, the good and lawful things which you have gained in war, and fear Allah. He is forgiving and merciful.” And those that haven’t come with their wealth and persons to join Mohammed’s army shall not be his friends. Captives may be open to the Faith, but beware of betrayers among them. So, I guess that when the Marines & Army Infantry kicked their butts in 1991 & 2003, we met an army of unbelievers, because no Arab has yet to show the ability to take on 20 to one and win, except against themselves, interesting, don’t know how suicide bombing of innocents fits in with this, nor bin Laden’s Fatwah against the U.S. and Western Europe. {And, I’ve read, The Legacy of Jihad, … , since, and can now say that it’s a must read.}]

Repentance 9: (This is the only chapter in the Koran which does not begin with the invocation ‘In the Name of Allah, etc.’ Traditional commentators regard it as a continuation of ‘The Spoils’.) [There can be no peace with Islam:]

9:3 Allah and His apostle are free from obligation to the idolaters. … Proclaim a woeful punishment to the unbelievers, except those idolaters who have honoured their treaties with you and aided none against you. With these keep faith, until their treaties have run their term. Allah loves the righteous.
When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and pay the alms-tax, let them go their way. Allah is forgiving and merciful. …
9:8 How can you trust them? If they prevail against you they will respect neither agreements nor ties of kindred. They flatter you with their tongues, but their hearts abhor you. Most of them are evil-doers.
They sell Allah’s revelations for trifling gain and debar others from His path. Evil is what they do. They break faith with the believers and set at nought all ties of kindred. Such are the transgressors.
If they repent and take to prayer and pay the alms-tax, they shall become your brothers in the faith. Thus We make plain Our revelations for men of understanding.
But if, after coming to terms with you, they break their oaths and revile your faith, make war on the leaders of unbelief – for no oaths are binding with them – so that they may desist.
Will you not fight against those who have broken their oaths and conspired to banish the apostle? …
Make war on them: Allah will chastise them through you and humble them. He will grant you victory over them and heal the spirit of the faithful. He will take away all anger from their hearts: He shows mercy to whom He pleases. He is wise and all-knowing.

[Much more, to get the full effect of Spoils 8 and Repentance 9, you’re going to have to get a copy of the Q’Ran and read it for yourself, because you won’t believe what’s in here unless you read it for yourself. Anyone who thinks that the Infidel can make peace with these people is a fool and endangers the rest of us and our future generations if they get into power. You’ve got to get a copy and read these two verses, actually only one, in their entirety because you simply won’t believe it unless you’ve read it for yourself. Islam has no interest in making peace with the rest of the world, none whatsoever.]

The Cow 2:1 “This Book is not to be doubted. It is a guide for the righteous, who have faith in the unseen and are steadfast in prayer; who bestow in charity a part of what We have given them; who trust what has been revealed to you (Mohammed) and to others before you, and firmly believe in the life to come. These are rightly guided by their Lord; these shall surely triumph.
As for the unbelievers, whether you forewarn them or not, they will not have faith. Allah has set a seal upon their hearts and ears; their sight is dimmed and a grievous punishment awaits them. …

[Back to the ambiguity of free will vs. predestination. More importantly from my perspective, is the opening line that one cannot question what is recited herein. The Cow continues in this vein then reaches back, once again, to Moses and the Old Testament for supporting proofs. The cow in the title is the golden calf of Exodus’ infamy. 2:61 is an anomaly of interest: 2/61 “Believers, Jews, Christians, and Sabæens – whoever believes in Allah and the Last Day and does what is right – shall be rewarded by their Lord; they have nothing to fear or to regret.” More Moses, apostles, scriptures and covenants and some anti-Semitism on a generic level. 2:113 “The Jews say the Christians are misguided, and the Christians say it is the Jews who are misguided. Yet they both read the Scriptures. And the pagans say the same of both. Allah will judge their disputes on the Day of Resurrection.”… 2:117 “They say: ‘Allah has begotten a son.’ Allah Forbid! His is what the heavens and the earth contain; all things are obedient to Him. Creator of the heavens and the earth! When he decrees a thing, He need only say ‘Be,’ and it is.” So much for Jesus’ God-head. More certain proofs of Mohammed’s validity by reaching into Old Testament Scripture for support, Abraham &c. and lots of ‘follow Allah or else’, there are sections of the old scripture being hidden from you, so the need for the Q’Ran and in your tongue and so you have your own apostle, the righteous are going to Paradise, the others not, Revelation, Resurrection and Judgement, plus rules of living, (no gambling, drinking, fornicating [although raping slaves is ok, apparently], &c., 2:233 mothers shall give suck for two whole years if that’s what the father wants, rules for divorce &c.) This is a very long verse, 32 pp in my copy, filled with rules for the righteous on how to live. Considering how divorce and how to treat one’s wife are in here, the libbers really need to see what Islam has in store for them; and pity the ‘sodomists’ amongst us, if this becomes universal. Hillary and O’Donnell need to read this, as well as Ann Coulter and all women.]

Women 4: 4:2 Give orphans the property which belongs to them. Do not exchange their valuables for worthless things or cheat them of their possessions; for this would surely be a great sin. If you fear that you cannot treat orphans (orphan girls) with fairness, then you may marry other women who seem good to you: two, three, or four of them. But if you fear that you cannot maintain equality among them, marry one only or any slave-girls you may own. This will make it easier for you to avoid injustice.

[Basically, how to treat the weak, poor and women; one must be just and fair, but, 4:11 “A male shall inherit twice as much as a female.” It’s a setting forth of laws of inheritance, trust and probate as well as dower rights. Also, 4:34 “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the others, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them. Then if they obey you, take no further action against them. Allah is high, supreme.” Well, I guess that means that if I “fear disobedience” from them, I can beat them and send them to bed with no supper until I no longer “fear disobedience”; so much for the Bill of Rights and equality in an Islamic world. There’re more rules of behavior and talk of the Last Day and judgement, and these are some of the things that we will be judged on. I don’t see how there can be any separation of religion and state under these rules. 4:76 “The true believers fight for the cause of Allah, but the infidels fight for idols. Fight then against the friends of Satan, Satan’s cunning is weak indeed.”; who in their right mind can think that a long-term peace is possible with these people – only makes the solution to this problem a huge one, doesn’t it? … more rules, Resurrection 4:91 “Others you will find who seek security from you as well as from their own people. Whenever they are called back to idol-worship they plunge into it headlong. If these do not keep their distance from you, if they neither offer you peace nor cease their hostilities against you, lay hold of them and kill them wherever you find them. Over such men We give you absolute authority.”; yet earlier, we’re told that those who would mislead you, meaning all infidels, by their actions and words, are hostile to you, therefore, Islam has been given complete authority over all others and they are charged with killing them wherever we may be. E.g.: 4:100 “It is no offence for you to shorten your prayers when traveling the road if you fear that the unbelievers may attack you. The unbelievers are your sworn enemies.”(emphasis added by me); personally, I don’t remember swearing Islam my enemy, but based on what I’ve taken note of so far, Islam has chosen to be both everyone’s enemy and executioner.; and that section above that refers to ‘keeping their distance’, that’ got to include commerce, so, gee golly, all that oil money is ill-gotten, isn’t it? And doesn’t that also mean that they shouldn’t have any trade with us at all? Hmm. 4:104 “Seek out your enemies relentlessly. If you have suffered, they too have suffered: but you at least hope to receive from Allah what they cannot hope for.” Justification for 9/11 and all the other attacks around the world? 4:115 “He that disobeys the Apostle after Our guidance has been revealed to him and follows a path other than that of the faithful, shall be given what he has chosen. We will cast him into Hell: a dismal end.” ; Mohammed’s in charge or y’all are going to Hell, a dismal end. Hell better be a very big place, because it’s surely going to be overfull based on this work. 4:125 “And who has a nobler religion than the man who surrenders himself to Allah, does what is right, and follows the faith of saintly Abraham, whom Allah Himself chose to be His friend?”; yep, methinks Hell is going to be quite full, based on these guidelines. No tolerance here, is there? Women is another long passage that should properly be read in its entirety and in context, not because the message is unclear, but because unless you read it for yourself, you won’t believe it, and certainly won’t believe me.]

Divorce 65: [Rules for divorce.]

The Table 5: [Rules and the Israelites and Christians are cursed; The Prophet’s in charge; some of Moses, Cain & Abel; 5:33 “Those that make war against Allah and His apostle and spread disorders in the land shall be put to death or crucified or have their hands and feet cut off on alternate sides, or be banished from the country.”; more rules and punishments, 5:38 “As for the man or woman who is guilty of theft, cut off their hands to punish them for their crimes. That is the punishment enjoined by Allah.”; so much for the Bill of Rights and the ‘cruel and unusual punishment’ clause. If Allah decrees it, is it cruel and unusual? Even the Mafia and the Cartels better pay attention if this book becomes law. 5:45 In the Torah We decreed for them a life for a life, an eye for an eye, a nose for a nose, an ear for an ear, a tooth for a tooth, and a wound for a wound. But if a man charitably forbears from retaliation, his remission shall atone for him. Transgressors are those that do not judge in accordance with Allah’s revelations.”; so much for the U.S. Constitution and that of any other country that doesn’t follow these laws, eh? O’Reilly should like this section, he’d get to condemn every single judge in the country who doesn’t order a child molester to get the same that he dished out, including the multiple rape response. The Table is another long passage that should be read in its entirety, if only to find out what crime gets what punishment.]

The Unbelievers 109: Say: ’Unbelievers, I do not serve what you worship, nor do you serve what I worship. I shall never serve what you worship, nor will you ever serve what I worship. You have your own religion, and I have mine.’

[Unbelievers in its entirety; pretty much precludes conversion and free will, doesn’t it? As well as makes plain that the only good infidel is a dead or enslaved one. Although:]

Help 110: When Allah’s help and victory come, and you see men embrace His faith in multitudes, give glory to your Lord and seek His pardon. He is ever disposed to mercy.

[And, we’re back to free will and honest conversion. How does this jibe with 9/11? Those people weren’t given an opportunity to sincerely convert, how do they justify that?]

Pilgrimage 22: [Good & Evil, &c. 22:16 “We have revealed the Koran in clear verses.” Hmm, not that I can tell and I do believe that there’s a verse up above where Mohammed says that only those whom Allah chooses can understand, somewhere back by Spoils as well as in The Imrans 3 which states 3:5 “It is He who has revealed to you the Koran. Some of its verses are precise in meaning – they are the foundation of the Book – and others ambiguous.” Allah will judge on the Day of Resurrection, &c. at 22:40 war is justified against all those who attack you, drive you from your homes, &c. and back to Noah and scripture for justification.]

The Imrans 3: 3:5 “It is He who has revealed to you the Koran. Some of its verses are precise in meaning – they are the foundation of the Book – and others ambiguous. Those whose hearts are infected with disbelief follow the ambiguous part, so as to create dissension by seeking to explain it. But no one knows its meaning except Allah.”

[So how can anyone follow all these people who claim to
correctly interpret the Koran? By definition, anyone who interprets this book for you, is misguiding you. So much for bin Laden and his ilk! Men are tempted, good and evil, 3:20 “To those who have received the Scriptures and to the Gentiles say: ‘Will you surrender yourselves to Allah?’ If they become Muslims they shall be rightly guided; if they give no heed, then your only duty is to warn them.” Back to free will and the implication that it’s ok to war on a people and then to ask your captives if they will convert – this because when 3:20 is taken in historical context, it is given immediately after the Battle of Badr and in context of what do we do with the prisoners. 3:28 “Let believers not make friends with infidels in preference to the faithful – he that does this has nothing to hope for from Allah – except in self defence.” So, it’s ok to lie to and deceive an infidel, because it’s being done in self-defense. More Noah, Abraham, Mary & Jesus, and 3:67 “Abraham was neither Jew nor Christian. He was an upright man, one who had surrendered himself to Allah.” Condemnations of People of the Book, Revelation, Resurrection and the wisdom of the Koran over all else. 3:110 “You are the noblest nation that has ever been raised up for mankind. You enjoin justice and forbid evil. You believe in Allah. ¶Had the People of the Book accepted Islam, it would have surely been better for them. Few of them are true believers, and most of them are evil-doers.” This is the relationship back to the definition of evil-doers and how Islam is free to destroy them, behead and have absolute authority over them, if you’ve been paying attention to the earlier passages; more for the literate amongst us: 3:118 “Believers, do not make friends with any men other than your own people. They will spare no pains to corrupt you. They desire nothing but your ruin. Their hatred is clear from what they say, but more violent is the hatred which their breast conceal.” More rules on how to live together, rules on usury &c. 3:140 “If you have suffered a defeat, so did the enemy. We alternate these vicissitudes among mankind so that Allah may know the true believers and choose martyrs from among you (He does not love the evil-doers); and that He may test the faithful and annihilate the infidels.” Does it really get any clearer than this? Peace with these people is not possible. This is another long passage that should be read by the individual in order to get true understanding of this “peaceful” religion. You won’t believe me, read it for yourself.]

Cattle 6: [Another long passage with nothing significantly different than that which has gone before.]

Prohibition 66: [Last verse in my copy. One of Mohammed’s wives told a secret that she knew of him, he found out. One shouldn’t spill secrets and it’s ok to divorce her if she does because you will be rewarded with good, obedient women, both widows and virgins. Believers who sin should repent and turn to Allah for forgiveness, which He may grant.]

*************************************************************

My notes include various conclusions and hypotheses on religion. After editing the above to what it now is, I’ve decided to withhold them; I do not want to influence you toward my biases; I want you to go buy a copy of the Koran and decide for yourself. Feel free to use these notes as you read the appropriate verses. This is NOT a peaceful religion and I can find no place where they will keep their word with us. And, in the end, consider this: All Muslim clerics are co-equal, anyone of them may issue a Fatwah declaring that terrorisim is not an acceptable means for carrying out Jihad, or for that matter condemning much of the Islamic violence directed everywhere including against each other, yet not one has, does, or will even contemplate such an obvious blaspheme against Allah’s Word as revealed by the pedophile, MOHAMMED.

Ain’t no such thing as a moderate MUSLIM!

August 11, 2014

Who lost the Viet Nam War, by Bruce Herschensohn, [nc]

Course Description
Did the United States win or lose the Vietnam War? We are taught that it was a resounding loss for America, one that proves that intervening in the affairs of other nations is usually misguided. The truth is that our military won the war, but our politicians lost it. The Communists in North Vietnam actually signed a peace treaty, effectively surrendering. But the U.S. Congress didn’t hold up its end of the bargain. In just five minutes, learn the truth about who really lost the Vietnam War.
Taught By
Bruce Herschensohn

Login to Receive Credit!

Transcript

Course Quiz

Related Books

Transcript
Decades back, in late 1972, South Vietnam and the United States were winning the Vietnam War decisively by every conceivable measure. That’s not just my view. That was the view of our enemy, the North Vietnamese government officials. Victory was apparent when President Nixon ordered the U.S. Air Force to bomb industrial and military targets in Hanoi, North Viet Nam’s capital city, and in Haiphong, its major port city, and we would stop the bombing if the North Vietnamese would attend the Paris Peace Talks that they had left earlier. The North Vietnamese did go back to the Paris Peace talks, and we did stop the bombing as promised.

On January the 23rd, 1973, President Nixon gave a speech to the nation on primetime television announcing that the Paris Peace Accords had been initialed by the United States, South Vietnam, North Vietnam, the Viet Cong, and the Accords would be signed on the 27th. What the United States and South Vietnam received in those accords was victory. At the White House, it was called “VV Day,” “Victory in Vietnam Day.”

The U.S. backed up that victory with a simple pledge within the Paris Peace Accords saying: should the South require any military hardware to defend itself against any North Vietnam aggression we would provide replacement aid to the South on a piece-by-piece, one-to-one replacement, meaning a bullet for a bullet; a helicopter for a helicopter, for all things lost – replacement. The advance of communist tyranny had been halted by those accords.

Then it all came apart. And It happened this way: In August of the following year, 1974, President Nixon resigned his office as a result of what became known as “Watergate.” Three months after his resignation came the November congressional elections and within them the Democrats won a landslide victory for the new Congress and many of the members used their new majority to de-fund the military aid the U.S. had promised, piece for piece, breaking the commitment that we made to the South Vietnamese in Paris to provide whatever military hardware the South Vietnamese needed in case of aggression from the North. Put simply and accurately, a majority of Democrats of the 94th Congress did not keep the word of the United States.

On April the 10th of 1975, President Gerald Ford appealed directly to those members of the congress in an evening Joint Session, televised to the nation. In that speech he literally begged the Congress to keep the word of the United States. But as President Ford delivered his speech, many of the members of the Congress walked out of the chamber. Many of them had an investment in America’s failure in Vietnam. They had participated in demonstrations against the war for many years. They wouldn’t give the aid.

On April the 30th South Vietnam surrendered and Re¬education Camps were constructed, and the phenomenon of the Boat People began. If the South Vietnamese had received the arms that the United States promised them would the result have been different? It already had been different. The North Vietnamese leaders admitted that they were testing the new President, Gerald Ford, and they took one village after another, then cities, then provinces and our only response was to go back on our word. The U.S. did not re-supply the South Vietnamese as we had promised. It was then that the North Vietnamese knew they were on the road to South Vietnam’s capital city, Saigon, that would soon be renamed Ho Chi Minh City.

Former Arkansas Senator William Fulbright, who had been the Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee made a public statement about the surrender of South Vietnam. He said this, “I am no more distressed than I would be about Arkansas losing a football game to Texas.” The U.S. knew that North Vietnam would violate the accords and so we planned for it. What we did not know was that our own Congress would violate the accords. And violate them, of all things, on behalf of the North Vietnamese. That’s what happened.

I’m Bruce Herschensohn.

August 3, 2014

Current News from France, from John Fasb, [nc]

Our wonderful media SURE DON’T KNOW HOW TO REPORT THE NEWS(Please read and forward):

Subject: FRANCE

Once again, the real news in France is conveniently not
being reported as it should.

To give you an idea of what’s going on in that country where there are now between 5 and 6 million Muslims and about 600,000 Jews, here is an E-mail that came from a Jew
living in France.

Please read! “Will the world say nothing – again – as it did in Hitler’s time?” He writes: “I AM A JEW — therefore I am forwarding this to everyone on all my e-mail lists. I will not sit back and do nothing.

Nowhere have the flames of anti-Semitism burned more furiously than in France …

1. In Lyon , a car was rammed into a synagogue and set on fire.

2. In Montpellier , the Jewish religious center was firebombed.

3. so were synagogues in Strasbourg and Marseilles ;

4. so was a Jewish school in Creteil – all recently.

5. A Jewish sports club in Toulouse was attacked with Molotov cocktails

6. and on the statue of Alfred Dreyfus, in Paris , the words ‘Dirty Jew’ were painted.

7. In Bondy, 15 men beat up members of a Jewish football team with sticks and metal bars.

8. The bus that takes Jewish children to school in Aubervilliers has been attacked three times in the last 14 months.

9. According to the Police, metropolitan Paris has seen 10 to 12 anti-Jewish incidents PER DAY in the past 30 days.

10. Walls in Jewish neighborhoods have been defaced with slogans proclaiming ‘Jews to the gas chambers’ and ‘Death to the Jews.’

11. A gunman opened fire on a kosher butcher’s shop (and, of course, the butcher) in Toulouse, France

12. A Jewish couple in their 20’s were beaten up by five men in Villeurbanne -France (the woman was pregnant).

13. A Jewish school was broken into and vandalized in Sarcelles , France .. This was just in the past week

So I call on you, whether you are a fellow Jew, a friend, or merely a person with the capacity and desire to distinguish decency from depravity, to do – at least – these three simple things:

First, care enough to stay informed. Don’t ever let yourself become deluded into thinking that this is not your fight.

I remind you of what Pastor Neimollersaid in World War II:

‘First they came for the Communists, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Communist

Then they came for the Jews, and I didn’t speak up, because I wasn’t a Jew.

Then they came for the Catholics, and I didn’t speak up, because I was a Protestant.

Then they came for me, and by that time there was no one left to speak up for me.’

Second, boycott France and French products. Only the Arab countries are more toxically anti-Semitic and, unlike them, France exports more than just oil and hatred.

So boycott their wines and their perfumes

Boycott their clothes and their foodstuffs.

Boycott their movies.

Definitely boycott their shores.

If we are resolved we can exert amazing pressure and, whatever else we may know about the French, we most certainly know that they are like a cobweb in a hurricane in the face of well-directed pressure.

Third, send this along to your family, your friends, and your co-workers. Think of all of the people of good conscience that you know and let them know that you – and the people that you care – about need their help.

The number one bestselling book in France is…. ‘September 11: The Frightening Fraud’ which argues that no plane ever hit the Pentagon!

PLEASE PASS THIS ON. LETS NOT HISTORY REPEAT ITSELF! THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIM

​​E.

Cu

July 28, 2014

Know Your Military Colonists, by Dan Greenfield [c]

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

Sunday, July 27, 2014
Know Your Military Colonists

Posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog 0 Comments

“Military Colonist” is a term that has gone out of fashion in this brave new world of “No Human Being is Illegal” and “Every Refugee Deserves to be Resettled.”

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-jReR5RtQmQw/U9VNPPaSzaI/AAAAAAAAOGE/goGc7-W8lTs/s1600/border-crossing-ann-coulter-voter-fraud-620×412.jpgThe university history professor with an office full of fake Indian jewelery and a view of the parking lot will lecture on the military colonies of the Roman period, always careful to emphasize their eventual fate. And he may even get up to the 16th century. But he’ll stay away from the present.

But if you are going to take land or seize power, you will need military colonists to hold it. The military colonist may be an ex-soldier, but he’s more likely to be someone the empire, present or future, doesn’t particularly need or have a use for. The Czars used serfs. The present day military colonist who shows up at JFK or LAX may also be a peasant with even less value to his culture.

Mexico’s military colonists are not military. Often they aren’t even Mexican. But they have managed to take back California without firing a shot. Unless you count the occasional drive by shooting.

While the United States sent tens of thousands of soldiers to try and hold Iraq and Afghanistan only to fail; Mexico took California with a small army of underpaid handymen who claim entire cities and send back some 20 billion dollars a year. As conquests go, it’s not hard to see who did more with less.

In 2009, 417 Mexican migrants died trying to reach America, and 317 American soldiers died in Afghanistan. But Mexico has more to show for it than America does. Every Mexican who settles across the border is a net gain who sends back money and spreads political influence. Meanwhile America is spending trillions on a much smaller army in a country whose land no one actually wants.

In 2009, the year Obama approved a 30,000 man troop surge, 3,195 Afghans received permanent legal status in the United States.

In the decade since the US invaded Afghanistan, 24,710 Afghans successfully invaded the United States and received permanent legal status. That is an occupying force larger than US troop numbers were at any point in time in Afghanistan until the very end of the George W. Bush’s second term.

During this same period there were also 19,000 Afghan non-immigrant admissions. As invasions go, the Afghan invasion of America was far more successful than the American invasion of Afghanistan.

That is even more true when you consider birth rates. Military colonists are not a mere invading army. They are generational footholds.

The American birth rate was at 13.5. The Afghan birth rate was at 37.3 at the time. American soldiers go home when their time is up. Sometimes they come home with a Muslim wife after converting to marry her. Afghan immigrants come with a birth rate that is nearly three times that of the country they are invading.

Across the ocean, the Algerian War is still going strong and France is losing badly. There are fewer bombs and bullets. Only men and women showing up and expecting to be taken care of. An army of millions could not have landed in France and begun pillaging the countryside. Not unless they came as immigrants. If you are going to invade a Socialist country, the best way to do it is as a charity case.

Unfortunately that holds true for us as well.

The military colonists flooding our shores are part of an unacknowledged partnership between their political leaders and ours. Their political leaders are fighting a war to redress the wrongs of centuries or millennia. Our political leaders are looking to shift the voting balances in a ward or a district for the next election. When they resettle the next shipment of Afghans in an otherwise conservative area with a view to tilting the electoral balance, they are using them as military colonists for the short term while their homelands use them as military colonists in the long term.

War is about controlling land, resources and populations. Land just sits there. It’s the populations that cause the trouble. The military colonist makes a more enduring occupation possible by settling the land and giving the conquering power a deeper foothold in the enemy territory.

There was a time when American settlers acted as military colonists holding down lands in Florida and Texas. Today America is being colonized by the settlers of other nations and ideologies. And we will find ourselves in the same position as the Spanish did in Florida and the Mexicans did in Texas.

Mexico invited American settlers to move in to Texas on the understanding that they would learn Spanish and otherwise fit in. Instead language and culture proved to be stronger than land and oaths of citizenship. Many of the Texas settlers might not have had much use for the United States at the time, but creed and culture made them American military colonists whether they knew it or not. The same holds true for the present state of affairs there today.

It’s more than just cultural or ethnic differences that make one a military colonist. It’s a cause. Whether it’s Manifest Destiny or the Reconquista or the Caliphate. Underlying it all is that sense of destiny. The power of an exceptionalism that makes it impossible for the settler to sink in and abandon his roots and beliefs to the tidal pull of a new culture when his grudge against it is more than the mere personal dissatisfaction of the new immigrant or his children caught between two worlds.

Integration is hopeless in the face of that sense of destiny. European nations struggling to defend some notion of secular space misunderstand the problem as one of extremism. Some of the more visible terror attacks may indeed be associated with what can be described as extremism in the sense that its participants are willing to push the envelope harder and further in more violent ways.

But Islamic terrorism is only the foam on the surface. It’s the bubbles at the edge of the pot. A minor symptom of a much bigger problem. Ir’s simply the most violent expression of a widely shared belief that Islamic law is superior to Western law. Most peoples feel that their ways and customs are best. It doesn’t become a problem until they become the majority and won’t take no for an answer.

American liberalism and European republicanism have no answers to Islamic terrorism. Their embrace of the Arab Spring was motivated by the need to believe that the Muslim world was ready to “advance” to the same postmodern level of existence eliminating the need to worry about women in Burkas or Al Qaeda. The same misreading of the power of tribe and religion that led to the foolish belief that Saudi Arabia’s military colonists could safely be turned into Labour voters led to the Arab Spring’s equally misplaced confidence that the Muslim Brotherhood wanted to be just like Europe.

It isn’t only a tiny minority of extremists who believe that Islamic values are superior to Western values and who would like the law to recognize that assumption. It’s a tiny minority of extremists who try to prove their devoutness by jumping the gun and killing people over it before the full demographic impact of the military colonists would make a Burka ban into the next Syrian Civil War.

Think of two armies maneuvering into position. The extremist is the one who fires before the enemy is fully in range ruining the strategic effect of the surprise attack. Trying to understand the extremist not only misses the point, it misses the whole chain of events in motion. The schemes for integrating the disgruntled youth and countering violent extremism is symptom control.

Terrorism is an early warning in the clash of civilizations and all our leaders can think to do is hold a meeting with the heads of the opposing army asking them to get their hotheads to stop shooting at us because it’s bringing our civilizations into conflict. Our civilizations are in conflict and have been as far back as they have both existed. The occasional plane hijacker is the first snowflake of a winter storm. Instead of preparing for a storm, we’re trying to figure out how to stop snowflakes.

The conflict is primal. It isn’t about American foreign policy or War X or Country Y or Cause Z. These are all “arguments” that explain the conflict once it’s already under way. It’s simpler than that. It’s about the incompatibility of cultures, religions, political and economic systems. And it’s about countries with a lot of oil and not much else trying to buy their way to an empire by using their own impoverished brethren as cannon fodder. And finally it’s about what happens when birth rates fall.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-29LVwLQc6Wc/U9VNrDWC8CI/AAAAAAAAOGU/mAnky0NH7NY/s1600/LondonProtest.jpgWestern countries have achieved individual comforts with an unsustainable system.

This unsuistainability is both economic and demographic as budgets and children are both lacking. Meanwhile the countries and cultures that have failed have achieved a perfectly sustainable state of misery. They may not have much income, but they also don’t have much to eat. They may have high infant mortality rates, but they have even higher childbirth rates.

America of 2013 cannot go on being this way indefinitely. It probably can’t even manage another two decades without major changes of some kind. Afghanistan 2013 however can go on being the way it is indefinitely. And that sustainability is what makes its people effective military colonists. Living the Afghan lifestyle in London or Los Angeles is even sustainable because food and housing are free.

That just leaves large packs of nomadic youths roaming the streets, selling drugs and rioting at the slightest provocation until it’s time for them to get married and make more nomadic youths of their own. It’s not that different from Afghanistan. It’s the tribal life transplanted to the West. It’s a culture with no real purpose except to produce young males eager to fight and expand tribal power and a religion with no real purpose except to affirm that as a religious duty.

Islam embodies expansionism. Its directives of male violence and female subjugation have no other end. They protect the tribal imperatives of endogamy and violence, of inbreeding and the feud. It has no ideas except to get bigger and that makes its followers into ideal military colonists.

[I said all of this back in 2007/8, both in the books and on the podcasts. This only possible solution from all of this, is secession, and soon, before all of King Barry’s Dreamers spread their terrorism, and their diseases, throughout the continent.]

July 25, 2014

Jihadis destroy Prophet Jonah’s tomb, ap [c]

Iraq jihadists blow up ‘Jonah’s tomb’ in Mosul: official
AFP
20 hours ago

Storyful
Islamic State destroys the Tomb of Jonah
 Islamic State destroys the Tomb of Jonah

Storyful (OT)

Storyful (OT)

1
Islamic State destroys the Tomb of Jonah

Islamic State destroys the Tomb of Jonah

Palestinians Seek Refuge in Hospital

The new jihadist rulers of Iraq’s northern city of Mosul on Thursday completely levelled one its most well-known shrines, an official and witnesses told AFP.
Related Stories

Islamic State rounds up ex-Baathists to eliminate potential rivals in Iraq’s Mosul Reuters
[$$] Islamist Insurgents in Northern Iraq Threaten Christians The Wall Street Journal
UN says Iraq jihadists order female genital mutilation, experts doubtful AFP
Islamic State claims wave of Baghdad bombings Reuters
Christians flee jihadist ultimatum in Iraq’s Mosul AFP

The Nabi Yunus shrine was built on the reputed burial site of a prophet known in the Koran as Yunus and in the Bible as Jonah.

“Islamic State completely destroyed the shrine of Nabi Yunus after telling local families to stay away and closing the roads to a distance of 500 metres from the shrine,” said the official at the Sunni endowment, which manages Sunni religious affairs in Iraq.

The endowment official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, and Mosul residents told AFP it took the Sunni extremists an hour to rig the shrine with explosives.

“They first stopped people from praying in it, they fixed explosive charges around and inside it and then blew it up in front of a large gathering of people,” said a witness who did not wish to give his name.

The endowment official said the Islamic State jihadist group that overran large swathes of northern and western Iraq last month have now destroyed or damaged 30 shrines, as well as 15 husseiniyas and mosques in and around Mosul.
View gallery
Al-Qaida-inspired insurgents gaining ground in Ira …
This undated file image posted on a militant website on Tuesday, Jan. 14, 2014, which has been verif …

Husseiniyas are Shiite places of worship that are also used as community centres.

The official listed the most notable losses to Muslim heritage as being the shrines of Imam Yahya Ibn al-Qassem, Aoun al-Din and Nabi Danial.

“But the worst destruction was of Nabi Yunus, which has been turned to dust,” he said.

The Islamic State late last month proclaimed a “caliphate” spanning parts of Iraq and Syria.

The group aims to create an approximation of society as it was in the early days of Islam, which was founded in the 7th century, and considers Muslims who do not adhere to its puritanical version of the religion heretics.

[After being elected, Obama said that the United States is a Muslim Country. Chapter 8 verses 12 – 15 are quite clear. Allah tells ALL believers to cut off the heads, hands, and feet of the non-believers. There has been and only is, one Jihad. It is on now, it is everlasting, and will continue to the end of days.

Israel just wants its own little piece of desert. Islam wants to destroy everything and everybody not of their particular sect. Sunni kills Shi’ia kills Wahhabee, kills whoever, and they all kill us.

AWE TV has a 3 part special on Jihad in the US. Its worth the time. OANN is doing ok, but not great.

Secession is the only way that we can get rid of the corrupt bureaucracy, corrupt courts, and corrupt & grossly incompetent congress.

Buy, Read, and Promote, “The Albany Plan Re-Visited.”]

June 19, 2014

Non-Profit Organization worthy of your support

Home
Leadership
Events
Contact Us
About Us

Signup for News:

Connect with Us:

Donate
Endorsements
Endorsees of PAC
CVFC Alumni

Lt. Col. Stephen Labate
Stephen’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Lt. Col. Labate is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Col Allen Weh
Allen’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Col Weh is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States Senate

Congressman Thomas Cotton
Thomas’s Primary: 4 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Cotton is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States Senate

Col Gary Lambert
Gary’s Primary: 11 weeks 4 days from now
Col Lambert is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Kerry Bentivolio
Kerry’s Primary: 6 weeks 4 days from now
Congressman Bentivolio is a combat veteran of the US Army National Guard
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Ron DeSantis
Ron’s Primary: 9 weeks 4 days from now
Congressman DeSantis is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Captain Joseph Miller
Joseph’s Primary: 8 weeks 4 days from now
Captain Miller is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States Senate

Congressman Michael Grimm
Michael’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Congressman Grimm is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Senator Mark Kirk
Mark’s Primary: 13 weeks 2 days ago
Senator Kirk is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States Senate

Congressman Duncan Hunter
Duncan’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Hunter is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Michael Coffman
Michael’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Congressman Coffman is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Col Robert Maness
Robert’s Primary: 19 weeks 4 days from now
Col Maness is a combat veteran of the US Air Force
He is running for United States Senate

SSgt David Vogt, III
David’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
SSgt Vogt, III is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Col Larry Kaifesh
Larry’s Primary: 13 weeks 2 days ago
Col Kaifesh is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Joe Heck
Joe’s Primary: 1 week 2 days ago
Congressman Heck is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Paul Cook
Paul’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Cook is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Lt. Col. Sean Seibert
Sean’s Primary: 15 weeks 2 days ago
Lt. Col. Seibert is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Brad Wenstrup
Brad’s Primary: 6 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Wenstrup is a combat veteran of the US Air Force
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Jeffrey Denham
Jeffrey’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Denham is a combat veteran of the US Air Force
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Colonel David Smith
David’s Primary: 9 weeks 4 days from now
Colonel Smith is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Jim Bridenstine
Jim’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Congressman Bridenstine is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman John Kline
Congressman John’s Primary: 7 weeks 4 days from now
Kline is a combat veteran of the US Marine Corps
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Paul Broun
Paul’s Primary: 3 weeks 4 days from now
Congressman Broun is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Adam Kinzinger
Adam ‘s Primary: 13 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Kinzinger is a combat veteran of the US Air National Guard
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Chris Gibson
Chris’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Congressman Gibson is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Col James Engstrand
James’s Primary: 15 weeks 2 days ago
Col Engstrand is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Steve Pearce
Steve’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Pearce is a combat veteran of the US Air Force
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Scott Perry
Scott’s Primary: 4 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Perry is a combat veteran of the US Army National Guard
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Cdr Ryan Zinke
Ryan’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Cdr Zinke is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Command Master Chief Larry Wilske
Larry’s Primary: 2 weeks 2 days ago
Command Master Chief Wilske is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Lt. Col. Steve Russell
Steve’s Primary: 4 days 15 hours from now
Lt. Col. Russell is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Steve Stivers
Steve’s Primary: 6 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Stivers is a combat veteran of the US Army National Guard
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Congressman Tim Griffin
Tim’s Primary: 4 weeks 2 days ago
Congressman Griffin is a combat veteran of the US Army
He is running for United States House of Representatives

Senator John McCain
John’s Primary: 9 weeks 4 days from now
Senator McCain is a combat veteran of the US Navy
He is running for United States Senate

Special Operations for America

http://soforamerica.org/

Special Operation Speaks

http://www.specialoperationsspeaks.com
Spec Ops OPSEC

http://opsecteam.org/

“That pause before Combat, similar to General Washington on bended knee at Valley Forge”
MISSION STATEMENT

The Combat Veterans For Congress Political Action Committee is dedicated to supporting the election of fiscally conservative Combat Veterans For Congress. We seek Combat Veterans For Congress who believe in limited government, will rein in the out of control spending of Congress, are committed to preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution, and will support the independence and freedom of the individual as outlined in the Bill of Rights. We support Combat Veterans For Congress who are dedicated to promoting The Free Enterprise System creating the greatest economic engine in the history of mankind, provide for a strong national defense, and will endorse the teaching of U.S. history and the Founding Fathers’ core values in educational institutions.

Path of The Warrior

http://www.youtube.com/watch
Your message has been sent.
Obama Approves Iran’s Move Into Iraq

It lacks credibility to believe the Obama administration did not know that prematurely pulling out all US Military personnel from Iraq, before the US Generals in Iraq, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the CIA, and the US Ambassador in Iraq said it was safe to do so, and before the US military were allowed to structure a Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq. Iraq is the only country in US history where the US military had been engaged in a military campaign, where no Status of Forces Agreement was negotiated before all US Military Forces were pulled out of the country. At that time, Iraq was willing to negotiate a Status of Forces Agreement with the Obama administration, but it was an intentional decision by Obama to leave Iraq without negotiating such an agreement, that agreement would have allowed for leaving a small residual force of 10,000 military personnel to continue to train the Iraqi Army and to booster the confidence of Nouri Al Moakley’s government of Iraq.

Recent events reveal why Obama failed to provide a small US military residual force on the ground in Iraq that a Status of Forces Agreement would have provided for—the quick exit from Iraq was Obama’s first step in allowing Iran to have develop a stronger influence over the internal affairs of Iraq. In the below listed article, it is explained that Obama has just effectively improved Iran’s strong influence in Iraq by encouraging Iran to move its Republican Guard Quid Force into Iraq, while for the last week Obama has refused to strike Al Q’ieda’s concentration of forces and the long lines of exposed convoys with US airpower.

The United States should not work with Iran’s military to defend Iraq under any circumstances—-it would be like allowing the fox into the chicken coop to protect the chickens. The US should support the Iraqi government with supplies, ground air control personnel to coordinate air strikes against Al Q’ieda’s forces, by providing US air strikes to take out the Al Q’ieda convoys, provide Spec Ops Forces to conduct certain classified missions, and should encourage the Al Moakley Shiite government to work with the Sunnis that they were working with, when the US was in Iraq, the Sunnis have since been alienated by Al Moakley. If Iraq is taken over by Al Q’ieda the country would be used as a safe haven for attacks on the US like Afghanistan was used to launch the 9/11 on the US. The military stability of the entire Middle East, and stabilizing the cost of a barrel of oil, depends upon the occupant of the Oval Office, who should finally take specific action to shore up the government of Iraq.

The Republic and its American citizens deserve better leadership from the current occupant of the Oval Office. Unfortunately, Obama was too busy golfing and going to multiple fund raising events in California this weekend, while the most serious crisis facing the Republic since 9/11, was unfolding over the weekend. There are 20,000 Americans in Iraq that must be protected; if Obama doesn’t take action to protect them and protect the interests of the United States in the Middle East, it would be a repeat of his “Dereliction of Duty” witnessed by the US Armed Forces when Obama refused to give the US military “Cross Border Authority” so they could dispatch a rescue force to save the lives of the Americans who were murdered by 125 -150 Al Q’ieda terrorist during the Battle of Benghazi.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________

OBAMA APPROVED IRAN’S MOVE INTO IRAQ

Advance of Tehran’s Revolutionary Guard stirs fears of Mideast proxy war
AARON KLEIN
Aaron Klein is WND’s senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on Salem Talk Radio.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guard

TEL AVIV – The deployment of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard to Iraq came after the Obama administration quietly gave its approval of the Shiite troop movement, according to informed Middle Eastern security officials.

The Obama administration pressed Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to allow battalions of the Quds Force to aid the Iraqi military in its fight against the Sunni Muslim Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS.

The Quds Force is special unit of the Revolutionary Guard responsible for international operations.

According to numerous press reports the Iranian forces were dispatched Thursday to fight in Tikrit, which was initially held by the ISIS but was subsequently liberated by the Iraqi army with help from Iran.

The Wall Street Journal reported two Guards’ units were further tasked with protecting Baghdad and the Shiite holy sites in the cities of Karbala and Najaf.

Obama’s actions give clarity to State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki’s statement on June 12 that Iran could play a “constructive” role in Iraq.

“Clearly, we’ve encouraged them in many cases to play a constructive role,” she said. “But I don’t have any other readouts or views from our end to portray here today.”

“The Iranians can provide some assets to make sure Baghdad doesn’t fall. We need to coordinate with the Iranians and the Turks need to get in the game and get the Sunni Arabs back into the game, form a new government without [Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al] Maliki,” Graham added on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

The direct military involvement of Iran, however, could trigger larger regional Shiite-Sunni clashes and may even represent the start of a proxy war between Sunni Saudi Arabia and the Shiite leadership of Tehran.

WND reported last week that, according to Jordanian and Syrian regime sources, Saudi Arabia has been arming the ISIS and that the Saudis are a driving force in supporting the al-Qaida-linked group.

The Jordanian regime sources told WND they fear the sectarian violence will spill over into their own country as well as into Syria.

ISIS previously posted a video on YouTube threatening to move on Jordan and “slaughter” King Abdullah, whom they view as an enemy of Islam.

The Jordanian sources explained Obama’s reported initial reluctance to assist in airstrikes in Iraq. The sources claimed striking along the Iraq-Syria border would cut off the supply line to rebels fighting in Syria.

DOD Outlines Authority For Employing Military Force Against American Citizens

Obama, fresh off his Rose Garden triumph to free 5 of the most dangerous “international terrorists” in captivity, announced an effort to re-establish a law-enforcement group to prevent “homegrown terrorism,” according to a report in World Net Daily. The panel apparently will include representatives from the National Security Division of the Justice Department, the US Attorney General’s office, and the FBI. Reuters News Service and The Washington Times reported that the new panel, to be announced this week, will focus on cases “that involve Americans who may be spurred to violence for political or prejudicial reasons.” The Obama administration will employ the US military, DHS, and Special Weapons Para –military Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Teams that were created in non-security related Federal Agencies against unrest by “domestic groups.”

For 5 years, the Obama administration’s has been taking unusual steps to prepare to employ military force against American Citizens, those plans have been issued in a Pentagon Directive and tested in large scale military urban training exercises (reported over the last few years by alarmed citizens and news media throughout the nation). Pentagon’s Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities” has provisions in it to use military force against domestic unrest. The directive was signed by then-Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn. A copy can be found on the Pentagon Web site at:http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302518p.pdf “This appears to be the latest step in theadministration’s decision to be able to use force within the United States against its citizens on Obama’s orders,” said a defense official opposed to the directive. In a recent New York Times articlehttp://nyti.ms/1ptgjkU it was reported that the Pentagon has developed programs to arm police departments in 38 states with grenade launchers, heavily armored mine resistant vehicles, silencers, flash grenades, 5.56 mm & 7.62 mm machine guns, equipment to detect buried mines, M-16 rifles, night vision goggles, etc.

This latest initiative is designed to prevent “homegrown/domestic terrorism” is continuing the very early efforts by the Obama administration to address their concern about domestic opposition to administration various policies. That very early initiative, began in the first weeks of Obama’s White House tenure, when Obama put conservatives in the bull’s-eye in his campaign speeches to supposedly oppose domestic unrest. At that time a newly unclassified Department of Homeland Security report warned of the possibility of violence by unnamed “right-wing extremists,” including opponents of abortion. The DHS report was followed days later by a report from the Missouri Information Analysis Center that warned law enforcement officials to watch out for individuals with “radical” ideologies based on Christianity and warned of the threat posed by returning Combat Veterans who were considered a danger to the Obama administration, and initiatives to prevent returning Combat Veterans being treated for PTSD from ever being able to own a firearm, which would be violation of their Second Amendment rights.

The Department of Homeland Security has been building up its armed Federal Police Force at a steady pace for 5 years. DHS has been purchasing many heavily armored vehicles for crowd control, an excessive amount of hollow tipped rounds of ammunition (many more millions of rounds of ammunition than the US Army and the US Marine Corps combined uses annually for training their personnel’s annually).

In the below listed article, in addition to the authority to employ military force against American citizens, concerned defense analysts say there has been a surprising creation and buildup by the Obama administration, of military units within non-security-related Federal Agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Teams in non-security-related Federal Agencies that have no need for SWAT Teams. Those Federal agencies include the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the Education Department.

The US Army, the US Army Reserve, the National Guard, and the FBI are fully equipped and qualified to provide security for all those non-security-related agencies in conjunction with local, county, and state law enforcement agencies, if the need arises. The Republican leadership in Congress has been “asleep at the switch” allowing the Obama Administration to create these private armed Para-military Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Teams to receive salaries, to be funded for their tactical training over the last 5 years, allowing them to buy massive amounts of ammunition, bullet proof vests, helmets, and allowed them to be armed with heavy weapons including machineguns & automatic weapons. Does anyone in Congress really think that the Education Department, the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Consumer Products Safety Commission, etc. needs to be armed to the teeth with SWAT Teams?
The Republican leadership in the House of Representatives, that is in controls of the Federal Agency purse strings, should have put a stop to the development of those heavily armed Para-military Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Teams over the past 5 years; some defense officials in Washington have referred to those heavily armed SWAT Teams as the beginnings of a Private Army. Those SWAT Teams should be eliminated by the Republican Leadership of Congress by eliminating the wasteful funding OF the purchase of millions of rounds of ammunition, the SWAT Teams intensive training programs, their bullet proof vests, their purchase of heavy weapons, helmets, SWAT Team uniforms, armored SWAT Team vehicles, and the salaries being paid to those SWAT Teams. Those SWAT Teams appear to have been developed under the direction of Obama’s appointed Czars, without Congressional authority or approval. The below listed article provides additional details.

____________________________________________________________

DOD Directive outlines Obama’s policy to use the military against citizens

sBy Bill Gertz

The Washington Times

Wednesday, May 28, 2014

Pentagon’s directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities”

A 2010 Pentagon directive on military support to civilian authorities details what critics say is a troubling policy that envisions the Obama administration’s potential use of military force against Americans.

The directive contains noncontroversial provisions on support to civilian fire and emergency services, special events and the domestic use of the Army Corps of Engineers.

The troubling aspect of the directive outlines presidential authority for the use of military arms and forces, including unarmed drones, in operations against domestic unrest.

“This appears to be the latest step in the administration’s decision to use force within the United States against its citizens,” said a defense official opposed to the directive.

Directive No. 3025.18, “Defense Support of Civil Authorities,” was issued Dec. 29, 2010, and states that U.S. commanders “are provided emergency authority under this directive.”

“Federal military forces shall not be used to quell civil disturbances unless specifically authorized by the president in accordance with applicable law or permitted under emergency authority,” the directive states.

“In these circumstances, those federal military commanders have the authority, in extraordinary emergency circumstances where prior authorization by the president is impossible and duly constituted local authorities are unable to control the situation, to engage temporarily in activities that are necessary to quell large-scale, unexpected civil disturbances” under two conditions.

The conditions include military support needed “to prevent significant loss of life or wanton destruction of property and are necessary to restore governmental function and public order.” A second use is when federal, state and local authorities “are unable or decline to provide adequate protection for federal property or federal governmental functions.”

“Federal action, including the use of federal military forces, is authorized when necessary to protect the federal property or functions,” the directive states.

Military assistance can include loans of arms, ammunition, vessels and aircraft. The directive states clearly that it is for engaging civilians during times of unrest.

A U.S. official said the Obama administration considered but rejected deploying military force under the directive during the recent standoff with Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and his armed supporters.

Mr. Bundy is engaged in a legal battle with the federal Bureau of Land Management over unpaid grazing fees. Along with a group of protesters, Mr. Bundy in April confronted federal and local authorities in a standoff that ended when the authorities backed down.

The Pentagon directive authorizes the secretary of defense to approve the use of unarmed drones in domestic unrest. But it bans the use of missile-firing unmanned aircraft.

“Use of armed [unmanned aircraft systems] is not authorized,” the directive says.

The directive was signed by then-Deputy Defense Secretary William J. Lynn. A copy can be found on the Pentagon website:http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/302518p.pdf .

Defense analysts say there has been a buildup of military units within non-security-related federal agencies, notably the creation of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) teams. The buildup has raised questions about whether the Obama administration is undermining civil liberties under the guise of counterterrorism and counter narcotics efforts.

Other agencies with SWAT teams reportedly include the Department of Agriculture, the Railroad Retirement Board, the Tennessee Valley Authority, the Office of Personnel Management, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Education Department.

The militarization of federal agencies, under little-known statues that permit deputation of security officials, comes as the White House has launched verbal attacks on private citizens’ ownership of firearms despite the fact that most gun owners are law-abiding citizens.

A White House National Security Council spokeswoman declined to comment.
President Obama stated at the National Defense University a year ago: “I do not believe it would be constitutional for the government to target and kill any U.S. citizen — with a drone or with a shotgun — without due process, nor should any president deploy armed drones over U.S. soil.”

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/may/28/inside-the-ring-directive-outlines-obamas-policy-t/#ixzz336H4e0xd
Support Endorsed Combat Veterans For Congress in San Diego County

Three of the 36 endorsed Combat Veterans For Congress, Congressman Duncan D. Hunter, Capt-USMCR (R-CA-50), Lcdr Kirk W. Jorgensen, USCGR/former Capt-USMC (R-CA-52), and Command Master Chief Larry Wilske, USN (Ret) (SEAL) (R-CA-53) are running for election in 2014 in San Diego County. Two of the above listed Combat Veterans For Congress, Lcdr Jorgensen and CMDCM Wilske are in tough primary contests and we respectfully ask you to cast your vote for them on June 3rd. They will bring to Congress their private sector skills and wisdom to better solve problems in government. They will more effectively represent the people of San Diego County, in order to rein in the out of control spending by irresponsible members of Congress. After they are elected, and go to Washington as freshmen Congressmen, they would benefit greatly from the leadership, experience, and guidance of Congressman Duncan D. Hunter, a dedicated American Patriot who has demonstrated his strong support for The Free Enterprise System.

We encourage you to click on the Leadership page of the Combat Veterans For Congress PAC Web site, so you can view combat photos and bios of Congressman Hunter, Lcdr Jorgensen, and CMDCM Wilske; their positions on issues in support of the Republic agree with the Combat Veterans For Congress PAC Mission Statement. We will continue to support and working with Lcdr Jorgensen and CMDCM Wilske after they are elected to Congress, as we have supported Congressman Hunter. The voters are so very fortunate to have two newly endorsed Combat Veteran For Congress of the caliber of Lcdr Jorgensen and CMDCM Wilske running for Congress in San Diego County.

If you have friends, associates, or relatives who know voters in the 50th, 52nd, and 53rd Congressional Districts in San Diego County, kindly pass this E-mail on to them, and ask them to support Congressman Hunter, Lcdr Jorgensen, and CMDCM Wilske by working in their campaigns, providing financial support in any amount to support their campaigns, and/or by networking with others who would support them in their election campaigns.

The military is one of the few remaining institutions producing the caliber of men and women needed to restore this nation to the greatness our Founding Fathers envisioned. We have endorsed three Combat Veteran For Congress in San Diego County that General George Washington would have approved of. They are courageous Combat Veterans who, at one point in their lives, wrote a blank check made payable to “The United States of America” for an amount “up to and including their lives.”

In Memory Of Our Fallen Comrades and Loved Ones

It’s that time of year when we publically honor our fallen comrades, then we go back for another year of quiet reflection on our loyal comrades and family members who are no longer with us. We trust that you will enjoy these two uplifting videos on Memorial Day Weekend; the first video is of the US Marine Corps Band with bagpipes, the second video is a bagpipe rendition of Amazing Grace in memory of our fallen comrades.

My thoughts often go back to my Naval Academy classmates like Col John Ripley, USMC, a true American Patriot, and other shipmates who gave their last full measure of devotion, in far off lands, they did so to defend our liberties and freedoms. We will stay true to their selfless service, and will not allow the domestic enemies of our Judeo-Christian heritage to take precious liberties and freedoms from us, freedoms and liberties that our fellow Americans died to preserve for us.

The US Marine Corps Band marching towards the ALAMEDA COUNTY FAIR GROUNDS in PLEASANTON for the annual CALEDONIAN GAMES BAG PIPE regatta.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uMsKSaewsh4&playnext=2&p=65AB1CF62220F2B9

The second bagpipe rendition can be watched by clicking on the below listed link.

Cong Tom Cotton, Cpt-USA, Esq. on the House Floor Speaking About The Battle Benghazi Cover Up

By clicking on the below listed link, you can view another endorsed and elected Combat Veteran For Congress, Congressman Thomas B. Cotton, Cpt-USA, Esq. (R-AR-4) speak to his House colleagues from the well of the House floor about The Battle of Benghazi cover up. Congressman Cotton was right on the money; he is running for the US Senate in Arkansas.

BOOM! Tom Cotton ‘drops the mic’ on the House floor after blasting Democrats ‘fake outrage’ over Benghazi

You can view Congressman Cotton’s photo in combat gear, and read his bio on the Endorsement page our Web site. We encourage yolu to contact all of your contacts in Arkansas to support Congressman Cotton election to the US Senate. Congressman Cotton repeatedly put his life on the line in Iraq to defend the “Liberties and Freedoms” we all enjoy.

Why Should You Support Conservative Combat Veterans For Congress

“Just 86 of 435 members of the House are Veterans, as are only 17 of 100 senators. This is the lowest percentage of Veterans in Congress since World War II. It’s no coincidence that this same period has seen the gradual collapse of our ability to govern ourselves, a loss of control of the national debt, and a disabling partisanship. Because so few serving in politics have worn their country’s uniform, they have collectively forgotten how to put country before party and self-interest. They have forgotten a “cause greater than self”, and they have lost the knowledge of how to make compromises for the good of the country. Without a history of sacrifice and service, they’ve turned politics into war.”

Please click on the below listed link to see what Obama has promised in his ”Fundamental Change” for the America you once knew, followed by what President Ronald W. Reagan has to say to you today about a vision of the big government, deficits, and out of control spending.

To preserve the freedoms in the Republic, the American legal residents of this country, need to go to the polls in large numbers to elect more Conservative Combat Veterans For Congress. All American citizens who want to right the Ship of State should support the campaigns of the endorsed Combat Veterans For Congress to rein in the out of control spending by the irresponsible members of Congress and they will stay true to their sworn oath as members of the US Armed Forces to protect and defend the US Constitution.
Obama’s foreign-policy ‘flexibility’ seen as weakness

The below listed Op-Ed was written by Admiral James A. Lyons, USN (Ret), the former Commander-In-Chief of the Pacific Fleet; he discussed the unilateral disarmament of the US Armed Forces by the occupant of the Oval Office, while Russia, China, Iran, and Al Q’ieda are building up their military strength.

Admiral Lyons discusses how the Obama administration’s 5 year foreign policy retreat resulted in Russia’s aggression in Crimea and Ukraine, China’s aggression opposing Japan ownership of the Senkaku Islands, Iran’s aggression against Israel & its development of nuclear weapons because Obama unilaterally lifted sanctions, Assad’s aggression against Syrian freedom fighters & his use of chemical agents again this past week against Syrian freedom fighters, and Egypt’s shift from its close relationship with the US to the establishment of a new military alliance with Russia.

Obama halted 30 years of longstanding military aid to Egypt, when the pro US Military Junta ousted Moslem Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi. Morsi was deposed because his supporters were rioting & killing Christians throughout Egypt, and because Egyptian State Security documented for US Intelligence Agency in 2012 that Mohamed Morsi was a co-conspirator in the attack on the US Mission in Benghazi, that resulted in the death of 4 Americans (the Obama administration has withheld the fact the Morsi was a co-conspirator in the attack on the US Mission from the American people for 20 months).

As soon as Obama halted longstanding military aid to the new pro-US military Junta, Putin executed a long term military alliance with Egypt. Russia is now providing Egypt with $2 billion in military aide consisting of MIG 29M/M2 Fulcrum jet fighters, MI-35 helicopters, air defense missiles, coastal anti-ship defensive complexes, light weapons, and supporting ammunition. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are paying Russia for that on-going military aid to Egypt, displacing America’s strongest Arab military ally in the Middle East.

The Black Flag of Al Q’ieda is now flying over territories it has been acquiring in its massive expansion over the last 5 years in Eastern Libya, in Fallujah in Iraq, in large areas of Yemen, in southern Somalia, in areas of Afghanistan, in the tribal region of Pakistan, and Al Q’ieda has been involved in the cocaine trade with FARC terrorists from Columbia, working in the Tri Border area of Argentine/Brazil/Paraguay based in the city of Ciudad del Este. Obama replaced Spec Ops boots on the ground that used to attack and capture Al Q’ieda terrorists for interrogation, with drone strikes from afar that has done nothing to stem the out of control worldwide expansion of Al Q’ieda over the last 5 years. Whenever an Al Q’ieda leader that is taken out by a drone strike, he is simply replaced by another Al Q’ieda leader.

History has taught mankind over the last 2000 years that, “Weakness Encourages Aggression”; President Ronald Reagan understood that well known fact and followed a different course, “Peace Thru Strength.” The current occupant of the Oval Office still doesn’t understand the “Weakness Encourages Aggression” and for the past 5 years he has been intentionally disarming the US Armed Forces and systematically dismantling many of America’s military alliances.

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

LYONS: Obama’s foreign-policy ‘flexibility’ seen as weakness
U.S. adversaries are watching the timid response in Ukraine

By James A. Lyons

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

The administration Kabuki dance we’re witnessing featuring U.S. refusal to provide nonlethal support equipment for Ukraine is President Obama displaying the new “flexibility” he promised Vladimir Putin he would have after his re-election. In short, it is capitulation.

The administration is trying to make the case that by showing restraint, Mr. Obama will encourage Mr. Putin, the Russian president, to be more willing to negotiate. The mind boggles. What’s taking place in Ukraine has far-reaching implications for the United States and our allies in both Europe and the Far East.

The apparent lack of support from NATO’s political leadershiphttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/icon1.png to help Ukraine maintain its sovereignty is clearly tied to its dependence on Russia for more than 30 percent of their energy requirements. This compromised position was accepted based on the assumption that European security after the Cold War could be guaranteed (with reduced defense budgets) by engaging Russia, not confronting it.

This now appears to be a costly error, since it has been known for some time that NATO’s engagement policies have not required Russia’s reciprocity. However, one positive outcome of the current crisis should be an unmistakable wake-up call for NATO, as its credibility is clearly being challenged.

The administration’s rationale for not providing nonlethal equipment, such as night-vision devices, body armor,medical kits, uniforms, boots and military socks to the “victim” is that it could be perceived by Russia as “destabilizing” and as a “force-multiplier,” and, therefore, too provocative. This is nonsense. Russia has deployed 40,000 fully equipped, modernized troops backed up by tanks, aircraft and helicopters, plus paid KGB goon squads that are creating havoc in Eastern Ukraine.

Mr. Obama responds by debating whether to provide what amounts to humanitarian aid because he doesn’t want to encourage Ukraine’s leadership to take more aggressive action to protect its sovereignty. With this type of convoluted thinking, we’d better hope that this administration and its national security team never gets us into a war that requires real leadership.

What is behind such thinking? Is Mr. Obama concerned that Mr. Putin will somehow scuttle his precious P5+1 (the five permanent members of the United Nations — the U.S., Russia, China, Great Britain and France — plus Germany) negotiations with Iran over its nuclear-weapons program? We can only hope that Mr. Putin would take such an action, as those negotiations are nothing but a sham. According to Director of National Intelligence James R. Clapper, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon in about two weeks, once the order is given.

Symptomatic of the Ukraine crisis, no matter where you look, the United States is seen as being in retreat. The stability that America brought to the global strategic equation is being systematically dismantled by the Obama administration, principally by the unilateral disarmament of our military forces.

The Ukraine situation is far from being resolved. China is flexing its military muscle in the Far East. The Middle East remains in chaos. Iran’s nuclear-weapons capability is almost a certainty. With the unpredictability of North Korea, why would the Obama administration at this time make the shocking announcement of deep cuts to the U.S. nuclear forces, four years ahead of the 2010 New START treaty schedule?

Our most secure deterrent, our strategic ballistic-missile submarines, will be reduced by 28 percent by having the capability of 56 launch strikes disabled. Thirty B-52 strategic bombers will be converted to conventional use, which represents a 38 percent reduction in capability, and 50 missiles will be removed from our underground silos, which is the most vulnerable leg of the triad.

With every nuclear power in the world modernizing its strategic forces, particularly Russia and China, plus the known fact that Russia has been cheating on existing treaties, making such a dramatic force-reduction announcement now is more than troubling.

The Obama administration is taking the United States down a course that will put us in an absolute nuclear inferiority position with regard to Russia and perhaps China. It is jeopardizing our national security.

With the United States’ strategic policy adrift, Mr. Putin is controlling events in the Ukraine. With basically no opposition, he will certainly seek more opportunities. In the Far East, we can anticipate that China, seeing our basic inability to respond to the Ukraine crisis, will seize the opportunity to absorb some low-hanging fruit in the South China Sea, most likely contested Philippine islands.

What will it take to make Congress exercise its constitutional responsibilities and maintain its legitimacy by acting in the best interest of the United States? We are being challenged, and we cannot afford to continue to embrace a fantasy foreign policy.

James A. Lyons, U.S. Navy retired admiral, was commander in chief of the U.S. Pacific Fleet and senior U.S. military representative to the United Nations.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/23/lyons-obamas-foreign-policy-fantasy/#ixzz2zoDQoW5A

Kit Daniels: Sen. Harry Reid Was Behind BLM Land Grab of The Bundy Ranch

The below listed article with the links will enlighten you about how a corrupt Senator Reid was behind the land grab of the Bundy Ranch. It turns out that Neil Kornze who was raised in Elko, Nevada, and was a former senior advisor on Majority Leader, Senator Harry Reid’s staff, joined the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) in 2011 and had been leading the agency as the Principal Deputy Director; he was subsequently formally appointed Director of the Bureau of Land Management, by a US Senate vote of 71 to 28. The BLM overseas more than 245 million acres of public lands nationwide, including 48 million acres in Nevada. So why did Senator Reid’s aide who owed his appointment to his old boss go after Cliven Bundy’s cattle ranch that had been in the Bundy family since 1870?

It turns out that in 2012, Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid who is lawyer with the prominent Harvey Whittemore law firm in Las Vegas, became the chief representative for a Chinese Communist Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group. Journalist Marcus Stern with Reuters reported that Senator Reid was heavily involved in a “DEAL,” as well as his oldest son Rory Reid who works for Harvey Whittemore. Rory and his father were both involved in an effort to get the Chinese Communist Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group, to build a $5 billion utility scale solar energy facility and panel manufacturing plant in the Nevada desert (instead of helping a US energy company benefit from such a development, Harry Reid imported Communists to do own land in Nevada and develop a utility scale solar energy plant). Marcus Stern wrote that that Senator Reid has been the most prominent advocate of recruiting the Communist Chinese Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group on his trip to Communist China in 2011; it was the same time frame when Senator Reid placed his senior senate advisor, Neil Kornze, in the BLM as the Principal Deputy Director. Marcus Stern reported that Harry Reid applied his political muscle on behalf of developing the Chinese Communist project in Nevada. Then in 2012, Rory Reid facilitated the Chinese Communist Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group in developing plans to build the $5 billion solar plant on public land in Nevada by helping the ENN Energy Group locate a 9000 acre desert site that it planned to buy well below the going market value of land sold by Clark County; you see Rory Reid was formerly Chairman of the Clark County Commission and facilitated the deal.

Unfortunately the problem with the area was that the 908 head of cattle in the herd on 67 year old Cliven Bundy’s family Bundy Ranch roamed and grazed free as they had been doing since the 1870, their grazing on open range would interfere with the Chinese Communist Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group’s solar field. So Rory Reid, working with Neil Kornze, trumped up the bogus charge that the grazing cattle were destroying an endangered species, the desert tortoise. The desert tortoise were proliferating (they were not in danger), despite the fact that the cattle from the Bundy Ranch had been grazing in their habitant for over 140 years, in fact the Interior Department had implemented euthanasia of the desert tortoise to keep the population from getting out of control. The BLM’s official reason for encircling the Bundy Ranch and family with sniper teams and helicopters was to protect the endangered desert tortoise which the Interior Department had been killing in mass for some time. Journalist Dana Loesch wrote “The tortoise wasn’t of concern when US Senator Harry Reid worked with the BLM and his former senior aide, Neil Kornze, who was now in charge of the BLM when they were literally changing the boundaries of the tortoise habitat to accommodate the development plans of the Communist Chinese Energy Giant, ENN Energy Group and the second most powerful man in Nevada, after Senator Reid, Harvey Whittemore,” who just happened to be the employer for Rory Reid’s and Rory’s three brothers (Harry Reid’s four sons).

Unfortunately the left of center liberal media establishment spun the story so Americans would view Cliven Bundy as grossly violating federal regulations and a law breaker, not the true story of how a corrupt Harry Reid was facilitating a Communist Chinese Energy Giant to come into the United States, displacing any possibility of a US Energy Company from getting to develop solar energy in Nevada, and arranged for the Communists to get ownership of US public land in Nevada below the going market price, while using Gestapo-style tactics to illegally remove a Patriotic Cattle Rancher off the land his family owned since the 1870s in violation of the rights accorded him by the US Constitution, the 10th Amendment, and the Bill of Rights. It should have been a story about the overreach by another bloated, corrupt, and out of control bureaucracy that was doing absolutely nothing to manage the overgrowth on public land that they were supposed to be doing, while in fact, the cattle from the Bundy Ranch were feeding on the overgrowth keeping the overgrowth under control. The principle and courageous stand by Cliven Bundy in the face of an oppressive BLM and the prosecution by Holder’s Justice Department, while fining him $1 million, illegally rustling 400 cattle of his herd, surrounding his family with snipers, knocking down his pregnant daughter-in-law, grinding Clive’s head into the dirt with boots on his head, arresting his son for taking photos of the Gestapo-type tactics, and tazing his son three times, etc. Cliven Bundy’s principled stand was a Seminole event, Patriotic Americans from all over the Republic mobilized, rode to the aide of the rancher with American flags flying, and supported the Bundy Ranch against an out of control government bureaucracy. When Neil Kornze realized the magnitude of the opposition he and Reid engendered from throughout the Republic, resulting in over 3000+ armed Americans who had arrived on the Bundy Ranch (with thousands more enroute), in opposition to his 200 federal armed guards, Kornze released the 400 rustled cattle he intended to sell, and pulled his 200 federal armed guards back from the brink of an armed conflict with very angry American citizens from throughout the Republic, who now had their own snipers in place at the ranch aimed at the 200 federal armed guards. This attempt at grand larceny by the BLM, and violation of Cliven Bundy’s freedoms all Americans are accorded by the US Constitution requires a Congressional investigation and actions in the courts to charge the BLM. We wonder if the Republican leadership in Congress will do anything about this attempt by an agency of the US Government to support a group in Nevada commit grand larceny on behalf of the Chinese Communists Energy Giant, or will they just let it ride, and hope it goes away?

We ask you to encourage those in your address book to support our effort to protect and defend the US Constitution, we try to do this by bringing violations of our freedoms by an out of control and corrupt administration to the attention of Patriotic Americans, by campaigning to elect newly endorsed Combat Veterans For Congress, and by campaigning to re-elect the endorsed and previously elected Combat Veterans For Congress. We plan to endorse over 50+ Combat Veterans For Congress to run for Congress before the November election. We are currently considering the endorsement of a slate of 28 additional Combat Veterans in 16 states to run for Congress in 2014. This November election will be the most important election in 238 years, and may be the last chance to save the Republic from Obama’s intent to “CHANGE” the Free Enterprise System, that created the most effective economic engine in the history of mankind, into a Socialist state—Socialism has never worked in any country it has ever been tried in over the last 100 years.

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Breaking: Sen. Harry Reid Behind BLM Land Grab of Bundy Ranch

BLM attempted cover-up of Sen. Reid/Chinese gov’t takeover of ranch for solar farm

Kit Daniels
Infowars.com
April 11, 2014

The Bureau of Land Management, whose director was Sen. Harry Reid’s (D-Nev.) former senior adviser, has purged documents from its web site stating that the agency wants Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy’s cattle off of the land his family has worked for over 140 years in order to make way for solar panel power stations.

Corrupt Democratic Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) working with the Chinese Communist gov’t to take land from hard-working Americans.

Deleted from BLM.gov but reposted for posterity by the Free Republic, the BLM document entitled “Cattle Trespass Impacts” directly states that Bundy’s cattle “impacts” solar development, more specifically the construction of “utility-scale solar power generation facilities” on “public lands.”

“Non-Governmental Organizations have expressed concern that the regional mitigation strategy for the Dry Lake Solar Energy Zone utilizes Gold Butte as the location for offsite mitigation for impacts from solar development, and that those restoration activities are not durable with the presence of trespass cattle,” the document states.
Obama Administration Released 68,000 Illegal Criminal Immigrants

Obama administration political appointees in the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) have been recruiting and appointing many pro-amnesty lawyers in key management positions throughout DHS. The goal of the Obama administration in placing those pro-amnesty lawyers throughout DHS was to dismantle the deporting infrastructure it took 12 years for the US government to create. Those pro-amnesty lawyers have been preventing ICE Agents, Border Patrol Agents, and CBP Inspectors from enforcing the Federal Immigration Laws they were sworn to uphold. Those pro-amnesty attorneys have instructed ICE Agents to “walk away” from hundreds of thousands of cases that should be prosecuted. They eventually directed ICE Agents to release 68,000 “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” into the general public, thus completing the corruption of that once proud Federal Law Enforcement Agency. The “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” were not in jail because of driving infractions—-they were felons who had been tried and convicted in Federal and Superior Courts because of serious criminal infractions, or had been convicted of very serious misdemeanors. Traffic violations like driving under the influence of alcohol or even vehicular manslaughter do not count toward ICE’s description of “Criminal Illegal Immigrant.”

The 68,000 serious “Criminal Illegal Immigrants,” released by the Obama administration will pick up where they left off, and continue with their very serious crime sprees, committing murders, rapes, burglaries, car theft, drug dealing, drug smuggling, human trafficking, armed robberies, attacking law enforcement officers, and much more that they were previously arrested and convicted for. The pro-amnesty attorneys at DHS could have deported the 68,000 “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” to Mexico, but opted instead to release those dangerous convicted criminals into the general public. American citizens who are concerned about the safety of their sons, daughters, grandchildren, sisters, wives, mothers, grandparents, small businesses, etc. will have to be on high alert to protect them from this new and very dangerous threat foisted upon them by the Obama administration. The “Criminal Illegal Immigrant” releases occurred without the required formal notification of local Law Enforcement Agencies (law enforcement has a need to know whenever dangerous felons are released prematurely, so they can alert police officers of the perceived spike in criminal activity in their jurisdictions), and those dangerous felons were released without notifying the victims of those “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” who will be in fear of their lives because they testified against those felons in court, in order to get them convicted. The political appointees at DHS simply unlocked the jail house doors and let 68,000 “Criminal Illegal Immigrant” walk free. Those “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” will now prey on American citizens, and will seriously complicate the task of law enforcement officers in their attempt to protect law abiding American citizens.

That unlawful release of those serious “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” and the complete corruption of DHS by Obama’s appointees into key management positions, is further proof that Obama continues to violate the US Constitution with impunity, as well as violate Federal Immigration Laws of the United States. In an interview on WBEZ-FM in Chicago on September 6, 2001, Obama said “The US Constitution reflected the fundamental flaw of this country that continues to this day” and said “the US Constitution has deep flaws, and the Founding Fathers had an enormous blind spot when they wrote it.” He also implied in that interview that the US Constitution was outdated, because he said, “it only reflects the time period of the Colonials and our Founding Fathers.” Obama raised his right hand twice sworn on a bible to uphold the US Constitution when he was inaugurated in 2008 and 2012; he swore “I, Barrack Hussein Obama, pledge to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America.”—–we know by his actions over the past 5 years, that his two sworn pledges were two more lies to add to, “If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor,” and “If you like your current healthcare plan, you can keep your healthcare plan.” and “Your healthcare premiums will be lowered by $2500.” and “The public will have 5 days to look at every bill that lands on my desk before I sign it.” and “I knew nothing about the IRS targeting conservative groups before the 2012 election.” and “I knew nothing about the “Fast and Furious” gun running operation to Mexican drug cartels.” and “I will have the most transparent administration in history.” and “I will restore trust in government.” and ”In a speech at the UN 2 weeks after he knew 4 Americans were murdered in Benghazi by Al Q’ieda terrorists, Obama told the entire world; “The attack on the US Mission in Benghazi was the outgrowth of a demonstration against a U-Tube video that went bad.” American citizens are now used to witnessing one lie after another by the occupant of the Oval Office, yet the left of center liberal media establishment continues to cover up the lies emanating from the Oval Office.

You will be able to read the details of the illegal release of the “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” in the below listed news article. We have information that although 870,000 Illegal Immigrants have been ordered to be deported from the United States, following their conviction in trials in US Federal Immigration Courts, that the pro-amnesty attorneys in key management positions at DHS have ignored those court orders, and those 870,000 Illegal Immigrants remain in the United States; ICE has been told to leave them alone, to “walk away” and “not enforce Federal Immigration Laws.” Over 40 million unemployed Americans citizens are searching for employment in the 5th year of the worst economic recovery in 70 years, yet their search for employment continues to be undercut by nearly 20 million Illegal Immigrants being paid very low wages under the table with no taxes deducted from their cash payments by US employers. There were over 11 million Illegal Immigrants in the United State when I was recruited as an Armed Federal Law Enforcement Officer in the newly established Department of Homeland Security in 2002—DHS knows that over 800,000 Illegal Immigrants continue to enter the United States thru the wide open borders each year, and for the 12 years since 2002 approximately 9.6 million Illegal Immigrants have come across the wide open borders (you might find it interesting to learn that a DHS official testified that US authorities are not “routinely” notified when foreign sex offenders enter the United States.). So the 11 million Illegal Immigrants figure that the Obama administration and the left of center liberal media establishment has kept referring to for 12 years, is more accurately 20 million Illegal Immigrants, not the 11 million figure that were illegally in the US in 2002. It is interesting to note that US military personnel are employed to secure the borders of South Korea, Afghanistan, and the Sinai, and are not employed by the US Congress or the occupant of the Oval Office to secure US borders.

The American people are wondering, whether the Republican leadership of the House and Senate, intends to do anything about the violation of Federal Law by Obama’s civilian appointees at DHS in the unlawful release of 68,000 “Criminal Illegal Immigrants,” many of whom are violent criminals The Speaker has control of the purse strings and funds DHS; he could have put pressure on DHS’s by threatening to only approve very low salaries for the pro-amnesty lawyers who are aggressively corrupting enforcement of Federal Immigration Laws at DHS. The current Republican leadership could have done something to stop the release of 68,000 “Criminal Illegal Immigrants” and could insist that the DHS deport 870,000 Illegal Immigrants who were ordered deported by US Federal Immigration Courts. It was always the primary responsibility of every one of the previous 43 US Presidents to enforce all Federal Laws passed by Congress, to protect and defend the US Constitution, to enforce Federal Immigration Laws, and to ensure that American citizens were protected from the threats of foreign convicted felons who had been preying on them. The current occupant of the Oval Office, by his actions over the last 5 years, has been intentionally shredding the “Rule of Law” and preventing Federal Law Enforcement Officers from “ enforcing the “Federal Laws” of the Republic that the 43 previous US Presidents upheld in the execution of their office.

SSA Michael Cutler, INS (Ret) provided the below listed information from Senator Jeff Sessions, and highlights how Obama continues to “shreds the Immigration Laws” that he swore to uphold, and cites examples of how Obama “refuses to preserve, protect, and defend the US Constitution”:

Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) recently released a critical alert about the status of immigration enforcement in the United States. In it, he writes, “DHS has blocked the enforcement of Immigration Law for the overwhelming majority of violations – and is planning to widen that amnesty even further.”

Put another way,

“At least 99.92% of illegal immigrants and visa overstays without known crimes on their records did not face removal.”

Senator Sessions’ alert continues:

“Those who do not facially meet the Administration’s select ‘priorities’ are free to illegally work in the United States and to receive taxpayer benefits, regardless of whether or not they come into contact with immigration enforcement.”

What we have is an Administration that is creating a de facto amnesty and encouraging more Illegal Immigrants to illegally enter the United States, granting employment authorization to “DREAMERS” and other illegal aliens, all the while American workers continue to struggle to find employment.
SSA Michael Cutler’s most recent commentary for California for Population Stabilization (CAPS) addresses the serious damage being done to America, and Americas by the ongoing expansion of the use of what the Obama administration claims is “prosecutorial discretion” but which, in reality amounts to “Gross Dereliction of Duty.”

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

REPORT: THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION RELEASED TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT CRIMINALS INTO THE GENERAL PUBLIC

President Obama’s Department of Homeland Security caught then released 68,000 illegal aliens who had previously been convicted of a crime, a new report from the Center for Immigration Studies shows.

The report, provided to Breitbart News ahead of its late Sunday evening release, reviews internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) metrics to conclude that the Obama administration released 35 percent—or 68,000—convicted criminal aliens back into the U.S. general population when they could have been deported. “The criminal alien releases typically occur without formal notice to local law enforcement agencies and victims,” CIS’s Jessica Vaughan, the report’s author, added.

By “criminal,” ICE means people who have been convicted of a misdemeanor or felony that is not a traffic violation. For instance, traffic violations like Driving Under the Influence of Alcohol or even vehicular manslaughter do not count toward this description of “criminal alien.” As for the definition of “alien,” ICE mostly means illegal aliens, though some are legal aliens when they are considered deportable legal aliens—which is possible for legal immigrants who have committed a serious crime, like a felony.

The documents also show ICE only deported a small fraction of the aliens they encountered overall.

“In 2013, ICE targeted only 195,000, or 25 percent, out of 722,000 potentially deportable aliens they encountered,” CIS’s Vaughan wrote. “Most of these aliens came to ICE’s attention after incarceration for a local arrest.”

This report comes out on the heels of a report from the office of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) last week which found that only .08 percent of the aliens deported in 2013 were not serial immigration law violators or convicted of serious crimes.

In response to these findings from CIS that follow up on his office’s report last week, Sessions said immigration law in America has essentially ceased to exist.

“The preponderance of the evidence demonstrates that immigration enforcement in America has collapsed,” Sessions said. “Even those with criminal convictions are being released. DHS is a department in crisis. Secretary [Jeh] Johnson must reject the President’s demands to weaken enforcement further and tell him that his duty, and his officers’ duty, is to enforce the law – not break it. As Homeland Secretary, Mr. Johnson is tasked with ensuring the public safety and the rule of law. But Secretary Johnson is not meeting these duties.”

The CIS report also contains a breakdown per city of percentages of criminal aliens who were released back into the population. San Antonio’s 79 percent is the highest, where ICE encountered 36,228 criminal aliens and released 28,680 back into the general population in 2013. New York City’s 71 percent is next, where ICE agents encountered 7,571 criminal aliens and released 5,391 of them. Washington, D.C. follows that, with ICE agents encountering 8,688 criminal aliens and releasing 64 percent, or 5,558, of them into the public. Other cities with high percentages include Salt Lake City, Houston, Phoenix, Los Angeles, Atlanta, Newark, and Buffalo. Notably, many of these cities are not in border states, which means visa overstays and illegal aliens who crossed the border but migrated further inward are as much a problem as the actual U.S.-Mexico border in terms of stopping the flow and enforcing the law.

“These findings raise further alarm over the Obama administration’s pending review of deportation practices, which reportedly may further expand the administration’s abuse of ‘prosecutorial discretion,’” CIS’s Vaughan wrote. “Interior enforcement activity has already declined 40 percent since the imposition of “prosecutorial discretion” policies in 2011. Rather than accelerating this decline, there is an urgent need to review and reverse the public safety and fiscal harm cause by the president’s policies.”

Sessions echoed Vaughan’s concerns, saying the lack of enforcement for immigration laws further hurts the ability of American citizens to obtain employment.

“American citizens have a legal and moral right to the protections our immigration laws afford – at the border, the interior and the workplace,” Sessions said. “The administration has stripped these protections and adopted a government policy that encourages new arrivals to enter illegally or overstay visas by advertising immunity from future enforcement. Comments from top Administration officials, such as Attorney General Holder’s claim that amnesty is a civil right, or Vice President Biden’s claim that those here illegally are all US citizens (apparently including someone whose visa expired yesterday), demonstrate the administration’s increasing belief in an open borders policy the American public has always rejected.”

Obama Caught Secretly Giving “Free” US Army and US Marine Corps Equipment to Putin While He Was Invading Crimea and It Continues Now

Another endorsed and elected Combat Veteran For Congress, Congressman James Bridenstine, Lcdr-USNAR (R-OK-1) uncovered another Obama secret scandal, the deal that was entered into behind closed doors by Obama with Putin, and was approved by Obama to give Russia “Free of Charge” crucial, mid-grade sensitive US military technology, used by US Special Operations Forces to get ready for combat operations.

The National Nuclear Security Agency has been providing Multiple Intergrade Laser Engagement Systems (MILES) to Russia; the transfer has been facilitated by Obama’s democratic Secretary of Energy Ernest Moritz he is overseeing this treasonous act and illegal transfer of crucial, mid-grad, sensitive US military technology to Putin while he was invading Crimea and poised to invade Ukraine. Moritz is continuing the transfer in the midst of Putin the mobilization of 150,000 Russian troops on the border of Ukraine.

Every American should be informed of this illegal act by the Obama administration, should read the below listed article, and should click on the three links to see how the Democrats in Congress have been betraying the American people. The Democrats in the Senate and House under Reid, Pelosi and the leadership of Obama have by their actions been degrading the “Combat Effectiveness” the US Armed Forces. They have been caught “RED HANDED” secretly giving US Army and US Marine Corps US military sensitive technology to Putin, instead of giving it to the National Guard, the US Marine Corps Reserve, and the US Army Reserve who desperately need that that type of equipment to prepare their personnel for combat operations.

The question every American should be asking is why didn’t Speaker Boehner halt the “illegal” transfer of crucial, mid-grade technology US military sensitive technology, to Russia “Free Of Charge” and allowed it to inserted in the House Fiscal Year 2014 and Fiscal 2015 budgets. Why did it require the investigation of an endorsed and elected Combat Veteran For Congress, Congressman Bridenstine to discover the traitorous and illegal transfer of US military sensitive technology to Russia “Free of Charge”? Will the Speaker “IMMDIATELY” stop this illegal transfer of US military sensitive technology to Russia, or will he do what he has been doing about the Benghazi investigation for 18 months, nothing, frustrating 186 Congressmen who keep asking Boehner to appoint a Select House Investigative Committee on The Battle of Benghazi, so they can finally have subpoena powers that the 5 House investigations on Benghazi do not have. To cover up what happened in The Battle of Benghazi, the Obama administration has classified information on Benghazi that should never been classified and has prevented 32 US personnel who were on the ground during The Battle of Benghazi from testifying—-the only way to get around that is for the House to have subpoena powers which Boehner has prevented 186 Congressmen from doing for 18 month.

Mr Speaker, 26 million Veterans in the United States, millions of patriotic American citizens, all the members of the US Armed Forces, Republican in the nation, Independent in the nation, Tea Party Patriot in the nation, and many Blue Dog Democrats are waiting for you to “do something”. Please don’t go before the cameras again, and make another indignant speech—we’ve had enough of your indignant speeches for the last 3 years, which are followed by your lack of action. Your lackadaisical attention to your duties allowed US Military’s sensitive crucial mid-grade technology to be transferred “Free of Charge ” to Russia, you also allowed the democrats to cut military benefits to poorly paid enlisted military personnel, to eliminate military commissaries, to reduce the US navy below its strength at the beginning of WWI, reduce the US Army below its strength at the beginning of WWII, eliminate entire categories of US Air Force Combat aircraft, allowed Obama to kill the cornerstone of US Naval Power–The Tomahawk & Hellfire Missile Programs, are in fact allowing the democrats to dismantle the US Armed Forces. Will you ever “do something”——you do control the purse string and have massive powers of control given to you by the framers of the US Constitution?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3138843/posts

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/03/obama-secretly-giving-putin-military-supplies-behind-the-scenes-from-our-national-nuclear-security-administration-caught-red-handed-by-congress-read-more-at-httpalternative-news-tkblogobama-se-2928098.html

http://freenorthcarolina.blogspot.com/2014/03/us-gives-russia-free-military-equipment.html?showComment=1395982749725

U.S. GIVES RUSSIA FREE MILITARY EQUIPMENT USED BY ARMY, MARINES

Posted on March 28, 2014 by Patriots Billboard

WHY ISN’T ANYBODY TALKING ABOUT THIS? WHY ARE WE HELPING RUSSIA AND SUPPLYING THEM WITH MILITARY TECHNOLOGY THEY DIDN’T HAVE UNTIL WE GAVE IT TO THEM. IT’S NOT JUST SNOWDEN GIVING AWAY OUR MILITARY TECH; OBAMA HAS ALLOWED CHINA AND RUSSIA MORE OF OUR SECRETS THAN ALL OF THEIR SPY’S COULD POSSIBLY STEAL.

3-28-14 Behind closed doors the U.S. government is giving Russia free military equipment—also used to train American troops—even after President Obama announced punitive sanctions against Moscow and, more importantly, a suspension in military engagement over the invasion and occupation of Ukraine.

The secret operation was exposed this week by members of Congress that discovered it in the process of reviewing the Fiscal Year 2014 budget and the proposed Fiscal Year 2015 budget request. It turns out that the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) has been providing the Russian Federation with the Multiple Integrated Laser Engagement System (MILES), the federal legislators say. The U.S. military uses MILES for tactical force-on-force training because it has a system of lasers and dummy ammunition to simulate ground combat.

It’s a crucial, military-grade technology that’s similar to a “laser tag” available in some commercial markets, according to one of the outraged lawmakers (Oklahoma Republican Jim Bridenstine) that helped uncover the scandal. Bridenstine, a member of the House Armed Services Committee, has joined forces with Ohio Republican Mike Turner, Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, to demand an end to the program. Along with about a dozen other House colleagues they penned a letter to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, who oversees the agency carrying out the “irresponsible military equipment transfers” to Russia.

The Obama administration’s planned supply to the Russian Federation is a grave mistake given the recent invasion of Ukraine launched by Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin, the legislators point out. “It is difficult to imagine a worse time to provide military-grade technology employed by the U.S. Marine Corps, Army, and Special Operations Forces to Russia than when it has illegally invaded Ukraine and is violating the intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty,” the letter to Moniz says. “To make matters worse, it is our understanding from the budget documents that the Department has been, and continues to propose, providing this technology to Russia free-of-charge.”

This is preposterous and borders on criminal if you really think about it. As if we need reminding, Congressman Turner recants Putin’s “brazen disregard for the sovereignty and stability of Eastern Europe” as well as his disregard for international law. “Despite this overwhelming evidence that Putin is not our ally, it is astonishing that the Obama Administration would still provide superior, U.S. military technology to an aggressive and advancing Russia,” Turner said. “The United States must seriously redirect its approach and immediately terminate all military aid to Russia.”

President Obama has already proven to be an international joke for his response to the worsening crisis in Ukraine. Even the mainstream media in this country has blasted the commander-in-chief’s foreign policy as based on fantasy. One famously liberal magazine published a satirical article saying that the Obama administration froze Putin’s Netflix account as a “major ramping up of sanctions.” In a piecepublished a few days ago, a former veteran congressman wrote this: “The embarrassment of U.S. impotence in dealing with Russian aggression in the Ukraine is only the beginning of what will likely be a series of foreign policy disasters.”
PLEASE SHARE THIS

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

next ›
last »

Neither military information, military branch logos, nor photographs imply endorsement of the Combat Veterans For Congress by the Department of Defense or their particular Military Departments

PAID FOR BY COMBAT VETERANS FOR CONGRESS PAC
2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184
San Diego, CA 92108
Nicole V. Parsons, Treasurer

« Newer Posts

Blog at WordPress.com.