Gender Ideology Run Amok

June/July 2021 • Volume 50, Number 6/7 • Abigail Shrier

Abigail Shrier
Author, Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters

---

Abigail Shrier is a journalist and author. She received her A.B. from Columbia College, where she was a Euretta J. Kellett Fellow; her B.Phil. from the University of Oxford; and her J.D. from Yale Law School, where she was a Coker Fellow. A member of the Board of Advisors of the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism, she has written for numerous publications, including City Journal, Newsweek, RealClearPolitics, The Federalist, the New York Post, and The Wall Street Journal. She is the author of Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters.

---

• Facebook
• Twitter
• LinkedIn
• Print
• Email

• Download Issue

The following is adapted from a speech delivered on April 27, 2021, in Franklin, Tennessee, at a Hillsdale College National Leadership Seminar.

In 2007, America had one pediatric gender clinic; today there are hundreds. Testosterone is readily available to adolescents from places like Planned Parenthood and Kaiser, often on a first visit—without even a therapist’s note. 

How did we get to this point? How is it that we are all supposed to pretend that the only way you can know I’m a woman is if I tell you my pronouns? How did we get to an America in which a 13-year-old in the State of Washington can begin “gender affirming” therapy without her parents’ consent? How did we get to an America in which a 15-year-old in Oregon can undergo “top surgery”—elective double mastectomy—without her parents’ permission? And what can we do about it?

*** 

To understand how we got to this point, it is useful to begin by considering gender dysphoria—the feeling of severe discomfort in a person’s biological sex. Gender dysphoria is certainly real. It is also exceedingly rare. It afflicts about 0.01 percent of the population, most of whom are male.

For nearly 100 years of diagnostic history, gender dysphoria typically began in early childhood, between the ages of two and four, and usually involved a boy who insisted that he was not a boy but a girl. Children afflicted are insistent, consistent, and persistent in the feeling that they are in the wrong body. It is by all accounts excruciating—I’ve talked to many transgender adults, most of them biological males, who describe the relentless chafe of a body that feels all wrong. 

Historically, this has been the classic presentation of gender dysphoria. When these children were left alone—when no one intervened medically or encouraged what we today call “social transition”—over 70 percent of them naturally outgrew their gender dysphoria. Most of those who outgrew it became gay men. Those who did not outgrow it became what used to be known as transsexuals. They did not believe they were women, but they felt most comfortable presenting themselves as females. 

Today, however, we don’t leave these children alone. Instead, the moment children seem not to be perfectly feminine or perfectly masculine, we label them as “trans kids.” Teachers encourage them to reintroduce themselves to their classes with new names and new pronouns. We take them to therapists or doctors, nearly all of whom practice so-called affirmative care—meaning they think it is their job to affirm the diagnosis of gender dysphoria and help the children medically transition. 

The typical first step in treatment administered to these kids is puberty blockers, which shut down the part of the pituitary gland that directs the release of hormones catalyzing puberty. The most common of these drugs is Lupron, whose original purpose was the chemical castration of sex offenders. To this day, the FDA has never approved this drug for halting healthy puberty. 

One has to wonder why a parent or a doctor would take measures to stop a child’s puberty, given that even a child with genuine gender dysphoria would most likely outgrow that condition if left alone. Some argue that it is traumatizing to let children go through the puberty of the sex to which they do not wish to belong. But in many cases, puberty seems to have helped children overcome gender dysphoria. The truth is that there is no satisfying answer, given that scientists have no way of predicting which children will outgrow the dysphoria on their own and which won’t. 

Proponents of “affirmative care” also argue that allowing puberty to occur is dangerous, because suicide rates for trans-identified youth and trans adults are very high. Therefore, they say, we need to start treating children with gender dysphoria as soon and as dramatically as possible. 

Yet there are no good long-term studies indicating that puberty blockers cure suicidality or even improve mental health. Nor are there studies that show puberty blockers are safe or reversible when used in this manner.

What we do know is that puberty blockers prevent the development of secondary sex characteristics, sexual maturation, and bone density. Indeed, because of the inhibition of bone density and other risks, doctors don’t like to keep children on puberty blockers for more than two years.

We also know that in almost every case when a child’s healthy puberty is medically arrested, placing the child out of step with his or her peers, that child proceeds to cross-sex hormones. And when puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones are administered to a girl, she becomes infertile. She may also have permanent sexual dysfunction given that her sex organs never reach adult maturity.

Given this, the claims made by so many doctors and gender activists today that these medical transition measures for children are safe and reversible—that they are a “pause button,” without serious downsides—are not only dishonest, but destructive. We would not accept this sort of glib salesmanship in any other area of medicine. 

Trans Identification among Teenage Girls

As I mentioned, for the nearly 100-year history of scientific study of gender dysphoria, it has been diagnosed almost exclusively in young children, and mostly in boys. But over the last decade, large numbers of teenage girls have begun to claim they have gender dysphoria. 

Prior to 2012, in fact, there was no scientific literature on gender dysphoria arising in teenage girls. Dr. Lisa Littman, then a Brown University public health researcher, used the phrase “rapid onset gender dysphoria” to refer to the subsequent sudden spike in transgender identification among teenage girls with no childhood history of gender dysphoria.

This spike is not unique to America—we see it across the Western world. To offer just one statistic, there has been a decade-to-decade increase of over 4,400 percent in the number of teenage girls seeking treatment at the United Kingdom’s national gender clinic. Across the West, teen girls are now the leading demographic claiming to have gender dysphoria. 

What is behind this is social contagion—the spread of ideas, emotions, and behaviors through peer influence, one more instance of teenage girls sharing and spreading their pain. There is a long history of social contagion with this demographic—anorexia and bulimia are also spread this way. And we know that teen girls today are in the midst of the worst mental health crisis on record, with the highest rates of anxiety, self-harm, and clinical depression. 

The teen girls susceptible to this social contagion are the same high-anxiety, depressive girls who struggle socially in adolescence and tend to hate their bodies. Add to that a school environment where you can achieve status and popularity by declaring a trans identity. Add to that the teenage temptation to stick it to mom. Also add the intoxicating influence of social media, where trans activists push the idea that identifying as trans and starting a course of testosterone will cure a girl’s problems. Put those together, and you have a fast-spreading social phenomenon. 

I’ve spoken to families at top girls’ schools who attest that 15, 20, or in one case 30 percent of the girls in their daughter’s seventh grade class identify as trans. When you see figures like that, you’re witnessing a social contagion in action. There is no other reasonable explanation. 

These teen girls are in a great deal of pain. Almost all of them have at some point dealt with an eating disorder, engaged in cutting, or been diagnosed with other mental health comorbidities. And now they’re being allowed to self-diagnose gender dysphoria by a medical establishment that has decided that its job is to affirm and agree with trans-identified adolescents.

Turning a Blind Eye

You may not know the name Keira Bell. She is a young woman in the U.K., very troubled in adolescence, who was rushed to transition in her teen years and came to regret it. She underwent double mastectomy and spent years on testosterone, only to realize that her problem had never been gender dysphoria. She sued the U.K.’s national gender clinic, and last December, after the High Court of Justice examined her case and the claims of similarly situated plaintiffs, she won. 

The Court examined the medical protocols applied to Keira Bell—protocols identical to the ones we have in the United States—and was horrified that a young girl had been allowed to consent to begin a process of eliminating her future fertility and sexual function at an age, 15, when she could not possibly have gauged that loss.

Hailed as a “landmark case” by The Times of London, The Economist, and even The Guardian, Bell’s victory was widely viewed as a serious condemnation of the effort to fast-track teen girls to gender transition. One of the appalling things the Court noted was that the national gender clinic had been unable to show any psychological improvement in the adolescents it had treated with transitioning hormones. 

If, as I suspect, you haven’t read or heard about the Keira Bell case, that’s because America’s legacy media decided to pretend the case didn’t happen. Similarly, they continue to ignore or dismiss the stories of the thousands of “detransitioners”—young women who underwent medical transition, later regretted it, and attempt to reverse course. A lot of the treatments these girls have undergone are permanent, but they do what they can to try to reverse some of the effects. 

Thus it is that in the United States, this crisis among teenage girls gets treated as a political issue—a conservative issue—rather than a medical one. And so perhaps the greatest medical scandal of our time is dismissed as a conservative preoccupation.

The Assault on Women’s Sports and Safe Spaces

No discussion of gender ideology can ignore the ongoing movement to eradicate girls’ and women’s sports and protective spaces. Many or most of the people pushing this are not transgender themselves. But they are activists, they are energized, and they seem to be winning. 

This movement promotes dangerous bills like the Equality Act, which would make it illegal ever to distinguish between biological men and women—and thus to exclude a biological male from a girls’ sports team or a women’s protective space, whether it be a restroom, locker room, or prison. We have these laws now in California and in the State of Washington—and as you might imagine, one result is that hundreds of biological male prisoners, many of them violent felons, have applied to transfer to women’s units. 

For activists pushing this, it is not enough to create unisex bathrooms, a separate category for trans-identified athletes, or separate safe zones in prisons for trans-identified biological men. No, they are working to abolish all women’s-only spaces and they want to abolish them now. 

***

The common thread running through these topics is that the truth is being obscured by gender ideology. Lies are told about the risks of the transition treatments administered to young children, both to play down the dangers of those treatments and to exaggerate the degree to which those treatments are known to be helpful. Lies are told about the researchers and journalists who attempt to report on the crisis of social contagion among teenage girls undergoing transition treatments. And lies are told about the movement to eradicate women’s protective spaces. 

The gender ideology behind these lies is a sibling of critical race theory. While critical race activists are teaching kids that they are largely defined by their skin color, gender activists are teaching kids that there are a great many genders, and that only they know their true gender. And just as families who object to racial indoctrination in schools are told that their denials of racism are proof of racism, young women who object to biological males participating in girls’ sports are told that their objections are proof of transphobic bigotry. 

These mendacious dogmas have corrupted our K-12 schools, our universities, and our legacy media, as well as our scientific journals and our medical accrediting organizations—the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Medical Association, the American Psychiatric Association, etc. To give you a sense of how far things have gone, I was informed late last year by a member of the National Association of Science Writers—an association of journalists with scientific backgrounds—that a member of the association’s online forum had been expelled for mentioning my book on the transgender social contagion among teenage girls. He hadn’t even read my book. He just mentioned that it sounded interesting, and for that he was banned as transphobic. 

Similarly, endocrinologists, psychiatrists, pediatricians, and researchers who are concerned about the risks of gender interventions report that they struggle today to get their research published. And public and private funding of research is almost entirely restricted to researchers who promote gender transition and downplay the risks. 

There are phalanxes of young doctors now, many of them in pediatrics or child psychiatry, who are open about their belief that their primary job is “social justice.” They unreservedly celebrate the increase in transitioning treatment of young people and are inexcusably complacent about the risks of those treatments. The Washington Post recently quoted some of these doctors to the effect that puberty blockers are fully reversible—which is not something that any honest doctor can claim to know. We simply don’t have the data to know whether puberty blockers are fully physically reversible when applied to halt healthy puberty—and they are certainly not psychologically reversible. We’re seeing a startling politicization of medicine and science, which is symptomatic of a larger woke corruption of American society.

***

Now, there’s something I make a point of saying whenever I speak, and I say it for the simple reason that it is true: transgender adults are some of the soberest and kindest people I have met in my work as a journalist. Many of them seem to have been helped by transition, and they are leading admirable and productive lives. They have no desire to harm women or to push transition on children. The gender ideology activists do not represent them. 

My understanding of freedom includes a belief that society should allow adults to make consequential decisions about their lives, which includes choosing to undergo sex reassignment surgery. And whenever I am asked by a transgender adult, I use his or her chosen name and pronouns. This seems to me the courteous and the right thing to do. But—and this is a big but—I never lie. This means I never say, and I will never say, that trans women are women. I think reciting this lie leads, as we are seeing, to unjust and dangerous consequences for women and girls. It is not courteous or right to parrot these lies. It is the cowardly surrender of women’s welfare to the woke gods. And it is wrong.

I’m also often asked why it is that the gender ideology activists are doing what they are doing. What possible justification could there be, for instance, for telling small boys that they might be girls and small girls that they might be boys? My best guess at an answer occurred to me while talking to detransitioners. I heard repeatedly from these young women that while they were transitioning, they were angry and politically radical. They often cut off relations with their families, having been coached to do so online by gender activists. Related to this, if you look, you’ll notice a disproportionate number of gender-confused people among the ranks of Antifa in cities like Portland. 

In other words, chaos is the point, and these troubled girls become prey for those who seek to recruit revolutionaries. Just as the destructive objective of critical race theory is to divide Americans racially, that of gender ideology is to disrupt the formation of stable families, the building blocks of American life.

So what do we do about it? How do we push back? First and foremost, we must oppose the indoctrination of children in gender ideology. There is no good reason for it, and it does real harm. We can absolutely insist that all children treat each other kindly without indoctrinating an entire generation in gender confusion. 

Second, we must overcome our squeamishness and speak the truth in public. Wherever we find ourselves, we must refuse to recite lies. And we must always clearly distinguish between transgender Americans, generally wonderful people, and the ideological transgender movement, which seeks to warp children and weaken families. 

This is a movement that would turn our children against themselves because its advocates know there is no greater harm—no quicker way to bring America to its knees—than by driving our children to do themselves irreversible damage. The people pushing this ideology have gotten a head start on us by perhaps a decade. But now I think they have awakened a sleeping giant. The success of my book is one indication. The many state legislatures that are now debating these issues is another. 

These are our kids and grandkids. Our future depends on our winning this fight.

[Feel free to copy and re-post.]

Archbishop Salvatore Joseph Cordileone

Archbishop of San Francisco

One Peter Yorke Way
San Francisco, CA 94109

Excellency,

May God bless you and your endeavors to maintain the teachings of the Gospel, Canon law, and Catholic social doctrine.  I write this letter to you to encourage you to remain steadfast in these teachings as so many saints and fathers of the Church have throughout the last two millennia. This is an issue that is long overdue for correction and education.  Sadly, as noted in the USCCB report of June 1998, too many Catholics are woefully ignorant of Catholic Social Doctrine, as is blatantly evident that about half of American Catholics voted for candidates who espoused and promoted policies contrary to basic moral principles.

The audacity of 60 Democrat Congressional representatives claiming to “work every day to advance respect for life and the dignity of every human being” while promoting extreme policies supporting abortion and removing protections such as the Hyde Amendment is an egregious violation of Catholic social doctrine and the moral law given to us by God. And it is not just the issue of abortion that is a problem. Their support of gay marriage and transgender policies are undermining the family, which is, according to the Compendium of Catholic Social Doctrine, the basic unit of society established by God as revealed in Genesis and throughout the Bible. Other problem areas include the support of socialism and assisted suicide.

Their continued and blatant denial of the integrity of the human person is in direct opposition to the teaching on those involved in political life is deserving of rebuke. “John Paul II, continuing the constant teaching of the Church, has reiterated many times that those who are directly involved in lawmaking bodies have a grave and clear obligation to oppose any law that attacks human life. For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them.” Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CFD), Doctrinal Note on the Participation of Catholics in Political Life, 4 “Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith.” (Catechism 2089, Canon Law 751) And so, their actions, which they try to excuse in this document, actually defines them as heretics.  Heretics are supposed to be denied the Eucharist! (Canon law 915)

I am confounded by the resistance within the clergy and the episcopacy to preparing a document that clearly reiterates these basic moral precepts. Pope Francis has told us we all have a mission which C.S. Lewis stated in Mere Christianity, 26.       “…[T]he church exists for nothing else but to draw man into Christ, to make them little Christs.  If they are not doing that, all the cathedrals, clergy missions, sermons, even the Bible itself are simply a waste of time.” Perhaps this lack of clear guidance and witness on the part of priests and the episcopy partly explains the statistics that for every “new” Catholic 5-8 Catholics leave the Church.

 Jesus expressed infinite mercy but always with a firm hand and with the admonition to “go and sin no more.” There is no sense of remorse or contrition in this document nor any indication that they would endeavor to avoid these sins.  Rather than vote for these policies they could abstain, but, no, they actively support them and boast about it.

Please know that most Catholics who worship regularly know the importance of the Eucharist and its being the “source and summit” of our Catholic life. I am encouraged that some bishops and priests are taking the important step of denying the Eucharist to these heretics and wish that more would step up in support and defense of our Lord, Jesus Christ. I pray that the USCCB will take positive steps to educate the faithful as well as demand that those who continually profane the Blessed Sacrament repent and believe in the Gospel or otherwise not present themselves to the Eucharist.

I keep you, Archbishop Naumann, Archbishop Cordileone, Bishop Strickland and many others in my prayers that you continue to stand strong for our faith.  As descendants of the Apostles and early disciples we look to you for education and guidance.  God Bless You.

Sincerely,

https://dl-mail.ymail.com/ws/download/mailboxes/@.id==VjN-VdT3lum1rUTt_0LJgqM40Thji_kIN3h3f13VTf–2Ng4KXY4KPc-yEKLx0JM8wV2kyNWTsPFrP5qvMFDt7aRWg/messages/@.id==AITBA3x3k6XTYOzDxwF66JmBtAQ/content/parts/@.id==2/raw?appid=YMailNorrin&ymreqid=91068bba-c626-c00c-1c9b-c800c3013a00&token=OMdETd0rka4XWUKI37rwnFPsnaqXf42w_baHVEX5iYZrQ8JESOlIP2dF2EFtthdteU9DTvLx2GIskVAS1-m8–d1IX0f3Cbc7byO34l55FwdA_xChhHmPghTbUSbF75R&error=https%3A%2F%2Fmail.yahoo.com%2Fd%2Fiframemsg%3Fid%3Ddownload-6268627897

[Don’t know if this will work, but ‘they’ have upgraded my stuff again, and this is what I got. Should be a telling puppet short on the new America, as told in a puppet coffee shop. Telling & humorous if you can get it.]

Bank of International Settlements Chief Talks “Absolute Control”Share this Article:

The General Manager for the Bank of International Settlements – the central bank of central bankers – is planning for “absolute control” of the money we all spend. Augustin Carstens recently gave a talk entitled “Cross Border Payment: A Vision for the Future” in which he outlined the problem as central planners see it, as well as their solution.

“We don’t know who’s using a $100 bill today and we don’t know who’s using a 1,000 peso bill today. The key difference with the CBDC is the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability, and also we will have the technology to enforce that.”

Carstens views CBDC, Central Bank Digital Currency, as a tool for eliminating privacy and for central bankers to force citizens to use currency exactly when, where, and how they are told. Dozens of central banks around the world are working on CBDCs, including the Federal Reserve. The effort represents a major escalation in the War on Cash. It is one thing to discourage people from using cash. It is something else entirely to introduce digital money which gives bureaucrats the power to monitor and control the spending of everyone who adopts it. Novel ideas are already being floated. For example, the Federal Reserve could issue stimulus funds with an expiration date, forcing people to spend rather than save. Officials could limit spending to certain geographic boundaries, and thereby impose a restriction on travel. They could pick winners and losers, favoring some merchants or industries or crushing others.

The only fly in the ointment is that mistrust in government is rising quickly in the US. Getting people who fear giving officials that much control and who care about privacy to adopt the new digital money could be a challenge. Many will actively seek alternatives, such as Bitcoin or gold. Central banks and governments do have some powerful levers to pull. 10 Oz Silver BarShop Now >>

It is easy to imagine government transfer payments being converted to digital currency. Social Security, Medicare, welfare, food stamps, and other benefits could be paid using the new CBDC. Government could also insist vendors and contractors take payment exclusively in the new token. We can also expect plenty of assurances from people like Carstens. They will promise to be fair and protect people’s liberty. They will say the goal is to make central bank policy work better for everyone. They will also insist they are trying to protect society from criminals, tax cheats, money launderers, and terrorists. The only question is whether the public will buy what central bankers are selling.

http://WWW.youtube.com/embed/9RABZq5IoaQ?feature=player_embedded

Winston Churchill loved paraprosdokians, figures of speech in which the latter part of a sentence or phrase is surprising or unexpected.
1. Where there’s a will, I want to be in it.
2. The last thing I want to do is hurt you, but it’s still on my list.
3. Since light travels faster than sound, some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
4. If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
5. War does not determine who is right – only who is left.
6. Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit. Wisdom is not putting
it in a fruit salad.
7. They begin the evening news with ‘Good Evening,’ then proceed to tell you why it isn’t.
8. To steal ideas from one person is plagiarism. To steal from many is research.
9. I thought I wanted a career. Turns out, I just wanted pay checks.
10. In filling out an application, where it says, ‘In case of emergency, notify:’ I put “DOCTOR.”
11. I didn’t say it was your fault, I said I was blaming you.
12. Women will never be equal to men until they can walk down the street…with a bald head and a beer gut, and still think they are sexy.
13. Behind every successful man is his woman. Behind the fall of a successful man is usually another woman.
14. A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory.
15. You do not need a parachute to skydive. You only need a parachute to skydive twice.
16. Money can’t buy happiness, but it sure makes misery easier to live with.
17. There’s a fine line between cuddling and…holding someone down so they can’t get away.
18. I used to be indecisive. Now I’m not so sure.
19. You’re never too old to learn something stupid.
20. To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.
21. Nostalgia isn’t what it used to be.
22. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
23. Going to church doesn’t make you a Christian any more than standing in a garage makes you a car.
24. I’m supposed to respect my elders, but now it’s getting harder and harder for me to find one.

   A Racist Training Program for The US Navy

By Capt Joseph R. John, June 26, 2021: Op Ed # 563

“Recent comments by General Mark Milley, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, demonstrate his willingness to support the venom of leftist ideology, and particularly its “anti-white” bigotry, under the same guise of “Critical Race Theory.”  Among the troops, is a disaster, destroying “Combat Effectiveness”, “Unite Cohesion”, creating dangerous racial fractions in the US Armed Forces, and destroying the once color blind military.  Such upheavals within military ranks are untenable and will only undermine morale, gravely diminishing all military capabilities.  Communist China, Marxist Russia, and Iran’s Islamic Terrorists are laughing while they expand their militaries.

What must be clearly understood about the enlistment oath, the every member of the US Armed Forces takes, is that the ultimate pledge is not to any person or cabal, but to the Constitution of the United States of America.  It is not a vow of blind allegiance, negating any other law or premise of right and wrong, mindlessly doing the bidding of whoever claims to be in power at the time.  First and foremost, American military personnel are swearing to never willingly engage in any activity that would do harm to the Republic they serve.  Yet on an ever increasing basis, that is what is being demanded of those who take the oath, at the hands of the Biden, Harris, Obama cabal and its minions among the self-serving “political” class of military leaders in the Pentagon.  What Milley, a truly corrupt and dishonest member of the deep state, is demanding of all military personnel, is that they violate their enlistment oath; a self-serving Milley realizes he either follows the Biden, Harris, and Obama Administration dictates that are destroying the color blind US military, or be removed from his high paying position.

Here’s a little insight for General Milley, and any of the other Joint Chiefs, like the woke Chief of Naval Operations referred to in the below listed article who align themselves with the ant-white racist Critical Race Theory. “Critical Race Theory” is the ultimate wolf in sheep’s clothing.  It is not about promoting equality among all the differing ethnicities who comprise “We the People.”  It is about presuming “total guilt” among “one” race, “White Americans”, and invoking that as justification for every form of unfettered bigotry and racial discord from leftist blacks and other minorities who are willing to pile on and vilify all whites.” 

                                                                                                                               (Joint Chiefs Demand Military Personnel Violate Enlistment Oath; Christopher G. Adamo | Jun 25, 2021)

If you click on the below listed link, read the article by Daniel Greenfield, and watch the slanted video prepared by the Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Michael Gilday, you will understand that the Domestic Enemies of the United States Constitutional Republic are now running the Department of Defense while destroying the “Combat Effectiveness” and “Unit Cohesion” of Obama’s new “Woke” Navy.  The article that opens, when you click the link, outlines the Racist Training Program that US Domestic Enemies have put in place. 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/06/racist-training-program-us-navy-daniel-greenfield/

The long term goals of the Racist Training Program, are outlined in the below listed article by Daniel John Sobieski, that follows the text of this Op Ed.  The goal of the Racial Training Program is to drive highly qualified white Conservative, Christian, and Constitutionalists career members of the US Armed Forces who voted for President Trump out of the US Armed Forces.  The Domestic Enemies of the United States have been recruiting non-white Progressives, Leftists, Socialists, Marxists, and Transgender/Gay recruits, to replace the highly qualified white Conservative, Christian, and Constitutionalist’s career members of the US Armed Forces who are being marginalized, so they will never be selected for promotion, and out of frustration, will be driven out of the US Armed Forces. 

Why have Republicans, led by McConnell and McCarthy, done absolutely “nothing at all” to prevent Biden, Harris, Obama, Pelosi, and Schumer from destroying the “Combat Effectiveness and “Unit Cohesion” of every branch of the US Armed Forces?  It is being done to the delight of Communist China, Marxist Russia, and the Iran’s Radical Islamic Terrorists.  Those three countries are feverishly expanding their armies and navies in preparation to invade Taiwan, to destroy the US Navy, and to then take control of a weakened United States with the support of their Socialist allies, the US Domestic Enemies in the United States.

While the rapid buildup of the Chinese Communist and Russian Navies is underway, Biden, Harris, and Obama have just cut back the long-range plans, put in place by the Trump Administration, to expand the US Navy Fleet of combat ships.  The growing Chinese Communist Navy currently has 350 ships.  For the first time in history, the US Navy with 293 ships, is smaller than the Communist Chinese Navy.  The Communist Chinese Navy is rapidly building a modernized and technical sophisticated fleet; it has its third aircraft carrier under construction, with plans to build four additional aircraft carriers.

Republicans in Congress, led by McConnell and McCarthy, are focused on raising donations to fund their 2022 mid-term Congressional campaigns, believing that will be the key to winning the 2022 mid-term Congressional elections.  It appears, eight months after the 2020 election, that extraordinarily little action has been taken to eliminate the Communist Chinese owned Dominion Voting Machines installed in 31 states, that count the votes on election day.  Failure to be involved in an all-consuming full court press, to remove the Communist Chinese voting machines, will be disastrous in the 2022 Congressional Mi-term elections.  It leads one to believe that McConnell and McCarthy have learned little from the election theft that occurred in the 2020 election, when Communist Chinese Dominion Voting Machines vote totals were changed via the Internet, late on election night when most voters were sleeping, with the help of their Socialist US Domestic Enemies allied with Communist China. 

On the 2022 election day, the Communist Chinese Dominion Voting Machines will, once again, be connected via the Internet directly to Communist Chinese operatives offshore, working with their Socialist US Domestic Enemies, who will allow Communist China to change the vote totals in each of the 31 states, at will, late on election night, to flip the vote totals once again, ensuring Socialist Democrats will steal the 2022 mid-term Congressional election.  Massive voter fraud and Ballot Harvesting will once again be perpetrated by Pelosi and Schumer with Socialist Democrats in 50 states. 

If in November 2022, the same Communist Chinese owned Dominion Voting Machines are used in the 31 states that employed those machines to count the vote totals on election night, then the result of that election will be a repeat of how Communist China and their US Socialist Democrat allies stole the 2020 presidential election, when state officials, not the state legislatures, also conducted the election in those battleground states in violation of Federal Election Laws and the US Constitution.   American Citizens have 17 short months, to convince McConnell and McCarthy to “do something, do anything”, to remove the Communist Chinese owned Dominion Voting Machines from 31 states, or the US Constitutional Republic will become a Socialist State under the control of Communist China’s allies in the House and Senate.

Joseph R. John, USNA ‘62

Capt    USN(Ret)/Former FBI

Chairman, Combat Veterans For Congress PAC

2307 Fenton Parkway, Suite 107-184

San Diego, CA 92108

https://www.CombatVeteransForCongress.org

https://www.facebook.com/combatveteransforcongress?ref=hl

Then I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, “Whom shall I send, and who will go for Us?” Then I said, “Here am I. Send me!” -Isaiah 6:8

The Constitutional Conservatives

Chief Of Naval Operations: “I Have Not Yet Begun To Be Woke”

Daniel John Sobieski 

June 18, 2021  

Or should his title be chief of navel-gazing operations? Someone should tell Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Michael Gilday that he has just one job – to manage and deploy the ships of the United States Navy in such a way to guarantee our freedom of the seas and to deny the enemy the use of those seas to attack the United States, sending enemy fleets to the bottom of those seas if necessary in time of war.

He is a military warrior. He is not a social justice warrior. Diversity to him, if I may be so bold as to use a gender pronoun, should be the proper mix of aircraft carriers, cruisers, destroyers and submarines needed to fight  America’s naval battles and project American power to defend our homeland and our allies. China and Russia don’t fear the diversity of our crews or the ethnicity and gender of the finger that launches that Tomahawk missile only their ability to fight and win battles.

But no, instead of preparing our fleets for battle, Admiral Gilday is damning the torpedoes and going full speed ahead on pushing Critical Race Theory on the Navy by putting a book espousing Critical Race Theory on the Navy’s reading list for sailors. His recent testimony before Congress shows us the trouble we’re in”

Adm. Michael M. Gilday, the Chief of Naval Operations, did not answer questions Tuesday about whether author-activist Ibram X. Kendi’s opposition to interracial adoption and capitalism is extreme.

But, Gilday did tell the House Armed Services Committee that Kendi’s controversial book “How to Be an Antiracist” would lead to “a better Navy” by promoting more discussion on racism in America. 

Kendi is Director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University, and his book contends that America is a fundamentally racist country. 

At the hearing, Cong Jim Banks, Lt/USNR (R-IN-3), an endorsed Combat Veteran For Congress, teed up a question to Gilday by noting that “the Navy recently completed a one-day ‘stand-down’ to remove extremism from the ranks.”

“In my view, Kendi has espoused extremist beliefs that clearly violate the oath to the Constitution I took when I served in the Navy,” Banks said….

“Let me ask you again, Admiral: Do you expect that after sailors read this book that says that the United States Navy is racist, that we will increase or decrease morale or cohesion and recruiting rates into the United States Navy?”

Gilday replied: “I think we’ll be a better Navy from having open, honest conversations about racism.”

The U.S. military is in fact the greatest meritocracy in the world. In the best tradition of Martin Luther King it judges people on the content of their character and their ability to fight, not the color of their skin. This book Gilday is pushing on sailors does not improve military preparedness or morale. Who wants to fight and die for a fundamentally racist country?

Here’s some fact, not theory, for Admiral Gilday. The Chinese and Russians want to be our oppressors. They want us to be oppressed by them. Preparing for that end, Russia recently held naval exercises off Hawaii:

Russian ships are conducting the largest military exercises since the Cold War off the coast of Hawaii, sending the US Air Force scrambling hours before President Biden meets Wednesday with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The exercises, conducted by the Russian Navy in the Pacific Ocean 300 to 500 miles west of Hawaii, include long-range bombers, surface ships and anti-submarine aircraft.

The US Air Force scrambled F-22 stealth fighters from Hawaii in response to the exercises.

Russia has conducted joint naval exercises with China, which has built the world’s largest navy with the fruits of its theft of U.S. intellectual property and technology and trade imbalances. The Chinese are laughing at our wokeness as it prepares to do battle with and defeat the U.S. Navy and as it prepares to invade Taiwan.  They are not concerned with diversity or the proportion of Muslim Uighurs on its ship as it moves to take command of the seas:

Take a look around. Russia recently conducted large naval drills around Ukraine. Chinese aircraft and warships are busily trying to intimidate Taiwan and bully Philippine fishermen in the South China Sea. All the while, Beijing assiduously has been expanding its navy at breakneck pace.

That pace is staggering as Beijing acquires port privileges and naval facilities around the globe. China’s new deep water navy is aimed at seizing Taiwan, kicking us out of the Western Pacific and neutering our nacal capabilities worldwide:

China has the largest navy in the world. And it’s not just big, but it’s getting better.

“The PRC [People’s Republic of China] has the largest navy in the world, with an overall battle force of approximately 350 ships and submarines including over 130 major surface combatants,” states the U.S. Department of Defense’s 2020 annual report to Congress on Chinese military power. “In comparison, the U.S. Navy’s battle force is approximately 293 ships as of early 2020.”

China’s Navy “is an increasingly modern and flexible force that has focused on replacing previous generations of platforms with limited capabilities in favor of larger, modern multi-role combatants,” the report says. “As of 2019, the PLAN is largely composed of modern multi-role platforms featuring advanced anti-ship, antiair, and anti-submarine weapons and sensors.”

China’s growing fleet of aircraft carriers has garnered the most attention. The PLAN has one decrepit ex-Soviet carrier, a newly commissioned carrier that is the first built in China, a third carrier under construction, and plans to build an additional four or more vessels. Fitted with advanced features like an electromagnetic launch system, a Chinese carrier fleet could provide air cover for an amphibious invasion of Taiwan, or even confront the U.S. Navy in the first carrier versus carriers battles since World War II.

An editorial in China’s The Global Times, a newspaper seen as a mouthpiece for hardline nationalists in Beijing warns of the consequences of resistance warns, “If the United States’ bottom line is that China has to halt these activities, then a U.S. China war is inevitable in the South China Sea.” As Investor’s Business Daily has noted:

Beijing has long declared the South China Sea to be its territorial waters and has laid claim to two disputed chains: the Paracel Islands, about 200 miles from the coast of Vietnam, and the Spratly Islands in the southeastern part of the South China Sea. China’s territorial ambitions include the Senkakus in the East China Sea, part of what Chinese military doctrine refers to as the “first island chain” that surrounds China.

In the South China Sea, as of February, China had finished construction on no less than six different island reefs from which to project its power in the South China Sea.  Included in its military effort is the construction of a 3,000 meters (9,842 feet) long runway on the artificially expanded Fiery Cross Reef as a base for Chinese fighter aircraft. According to Reuters,

China’s creation of artificial islands in the South China Sea is happening so fast that Beijing will be able to extend the range of its navy, air force, coastguard and fishing fleets before long, much to the alarm of rival claimants to the contested waters.

Reclamation work is well advanced on six reefs in the Spratly archipelago, according to recently published satellite photographs and Philippine officials. In addition, Manila said this month that Chinese dredgers had started reclaiming a seventh.

A few years ago, naval commanders expressed concern that our ability to respond to such threats has been severely compromised by leaders more concerned about rising sea levels than rising threats on those seas. The Navy captains’ Congressional testimony came after the Chinese announcement that it was building its second aircraft to go along with a refurbished Soviet carrier, the Liaonng, commissioned by China in 2012 after extensive refitting of the 25-year-old vessel. As IBD has reported, the Liaoning is only the first step I the building of a blue-water navy capable of competing with our diminishing one, with Admiral Samuel J. Locklear III, chief of the U.S. Pacific Command, warning that the U.S. was losing its Pacific dominance to China:

China’s Communist Party-affiliated newspaper, Global Times, gloated over Locklear’s warning, noting his remarks in a story beneath the headline “U.S. losing grip on Pacific: PACOM.”

In the Times story, Jin Canrong, a deputy dean of the School of International Studies at Renmin University of China, said the American admiral’s comments recognize China as a rising military power. Indeed, it is. China has launched its first stealth drone, known as Sharp Sword, and is developing indigenous aircraft carriers. Its “two-ocean strategy” is based on the goal of building a fleet of five or six carrier battle groups.

China’s first battle group, led by its first carrier, the Liaoning, recently conducted a monthlong exercise that saw the refurbished Soviet-built flattop and her escorts sail south to the waters near Taiwan. During the exercise, a Chinese warship nearly collided with the guided missile cruiser USS Cowpens, which was shadowing the battle group.

China is preparing for a naval confrontation with the United States. We may lose that confrontation in the South China Sea because the U.S. Navy is focusing on “wokeness”, not readiness.

Daniel John Sobieski is a former editorial writer for Investor’s Business Daily and free-lance writer whose pieces have appeared in Human Events, Reason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.    

Since crypto-currencies only exist in the cloud, how do you access your wealth when the electricity goes out?

Rolling black outs all along the West Coast in 2019, 2020, and locked down with brown-outs in 2021, how do you “spend” or trade crypto-currencies?

EMP’s, and there are several gov’t USAF unclassified bulletins posted herein and links to Janes articles about them herein, coupled to Russian, Chinese, and No Korean hacking, how secure are these fantasy currencies?

And, if Elon Musk says that Tesla will, after all of what, six months?, no longer take Bitcoin as currency to purchase a car, what’s that say about its real use in the real world if even Elon Musk won’t touch it?

Just curious, who is actually profiting with this stuff? What happened/happens to the actual cash that went/goes into the purchase of crypto-currencies?

Just curious.

FINANCE / GOVERNMENT WATCH / POLITICS

Biden-omics – Seven Deadly Sins

Posted Wednesday, May 12, 2021   |   By AMAC, Robert B. Charles   |  4 Comments Share Tweet Email

Biden-omics is coming – massive debt, unchecked spending, higher inflation, taxes, interest, unemployment, and hype.  Those seven blips are in formation on most economists’ radar.  They result from historical ignorance, socialist instincts, recklessness, and disrespect for private businesses and citizens.  The seven blips – in order:

First, massive debt — There can be no argument.  We are in a debt dive, record-breaking national debt, record publicly held, and federal outlays now far beyond tax revenues.  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reported on April 30 that “mandatory spending” hit $4.6 trillion annually.  CBO confirms the dive:  Outlays (spending) totaled $5.8 trillion, revenue projected $3.5 trillion, carry-forward deficit $2.3 trillion, and debt held by the public $22.5 trillion.  So, with a huge deficit overhang, taxes cover just 65 percent of what Congress is spending.  Do you see the problem?

Like an airframe in a steep dive, reality comes up fast, or else your nose does – with all the associated pain.  We should hope on the nose coming up, but there is no sign – no cost-cutting, debt reduction, painful austerity, trust in the private sector.  Instead, we have debt indifference and runaway spending.   See https://www.cbo.gov/topics/budget.

Second, unchecked spending – How much excess federal spending do we have?  Stunning already, stunning proposed.  Beyond $4.9 trillion in “regular” spending (non-COVID) and $6 trillion in previously unappropriated or emergency supplemental (COVID) spending last year, Biden added $1.9 trillion in 2021 for COVID, despite economists arguing more debt will slow the economy.  Already, “regular” spending (mostly “entitlements”) nearly doubled from 2008 to 2021, just over $2.5 to nearly $5 trillion. See https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-spending-3305763.

Now, we hear Biden’s White House and Democrats calling for “trillions more” in federal spending – so-called “infrastructure” ($2.3 trillion, defined as anything), “American family” programs ($1.2 trillion, more anything), and “immigration” (quarter of trillion, money for those inside the US illegally), foreign aid (for those sending illegal aliens north), and one-party electoral monopolization (complete with DC statehood).  How much debt is contemplated?  The zeros would make a new paragraph.  Even the New York Times puts new spending at $6 trillion – over where we are!  See, e.g., https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/28/us/politics/biden-spending-plans.html; https://finance.yahoo.com/news/1-key-u-senate-democrat-142826733.html; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/biden-american-families-plan-900-billion-cost/; https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/sep/21/inside-the-beltway-the-biden-plan-20-million-illeg/; https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-biden-idUSKCN2AT3T4.

In short, Biden thinks US taxpayers – and struggling small businesses – should bankroll a huge increase in federal spending on things most Americans neither need nor want, at a time when revenues fell 35 percent shy of covering last year’s spending. Make sense?  Hardly.

Third, higher inflation – This is where predicting is easy.  With mass debt, spending, and indifference, the dollar’s value falls.  More paper money chases less wealth, as new spending means more debt and taxes, sucked from the productive private sector into the non-productive public.

Prices will rise sharply – at home and for foreign inputs as the dollar falls. Just check gas prices, as Biden spends more and pinches energy. Or check Jimmy Carter’s track record – when inflation ran away.  Even liberal economists cannot duck it – inflation is about to roar. See, e.g., http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/get-ready-for-the-most-painful-inflation-since-the-jimmy-carter-years-of-the-1970s/;  https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/news/gas-prices-top-243-in-pa-to-hit-highest-point-in-two-years-how-much-higher-will-they-go/ar-BB1gu5rC?ocid=uxbndlbing; https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-03-29/faster-inflation-is-coming-how-bad-will-it-be.

Lest you think this an exaggeration, the federal government “produces” nothing, while a dollar left in the private sector has an estimated 16-fold “multiplier effect” – one producer passing to the next, 16 times.  Who will inflation affect?  You and me. Average Americans, small businesses, older Americans on fixed pensions, younger on fixed wages, those paying loans with variable interest rates – are all in trouble.

Fourth, higher taxes – Biden and Democrats have set the spike. To “pay for” new spending, they push higher taxes on “the rich” – conveniently pushing class warfare, forgetting that in America, merit is what makes people rich, and anyone can become rich with hard work, ingenuity, luck, and lower taxes.  No, they aim to “punish” – so watch out, they are coming for small business, which could mean your job. See https://taxfoundation.org/joe-biden-tax-plan-2020/.

Fifth, higher interest – Of course, another easy prediction is how the Federal Reserve reacts to inflation.  They raise interest rates to “slow” the “overheating.” Higher rates reduce borrowing, hurt debt holders, increase payments on the national debt, and slow the real economy – the inflation aside. See, e.g.,  https://www.forbes.com/sites/steveforbes/2021/01/21/warning-higher-interest-rates-are-coming/.

Sixth, higher unemployment.  Unfortunately, when taxes and interest rates go up, when the cost of borrowing, inflation worry, federal debt, spending, and overall uncertainty rises, consumer spending, business investment, and employment fall. That means – as it did under Carter – higher unemployment.

Seventh, hype.  Now we come to the irony.  President Biden is either oblivious or buys into socialist centralization, mass spending, inflation, unemployment, and the debt dive. Biden avoids discussing these problems, framing debt as an investment (despite the net drain on the private sector), pretends taxing the rich is good (only if you ignore upward mobility), and spins bad as good.

Last week, Biden blamed bad employment numbers on Trump, then pushed them as good news since they justify more unemployment benefits and federal spending.  Bizarre, but what else can you do if you are driving the economy into a ditch – or are asleep at the wheel?  See, e.g., https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/05/07/biden-attempts-to-spin-disastrous-jobs-numbers-n2589122.

Short story:  The private economy – left alone – would roar out of COVID.  Instead, Biden and Democrats are hitting it with mass debt and spending, setting up higher inflation, taxes, interest, and unemployment.  Radar blips are clear – and getting closer.  Americans should plan and then tell every public official to stop spending their money.

[Crypto-currency is not a currency and will be of no use whatsoever when our enemies hack the code and steal it all. Buddy of mine, Mike, now in Castle Rock, had his ‘purse’ hacked and lost everything in it. When he went to Bit-coin, they said that it was his fault and not theirs. Oh, Well!

No petrochemicals, no food, no electricity, no jobs, no money.

Gold, silver, and ammo, urban fire team drills now being offered on-line. Somewhere on the blog is Tom Chittum’s, ‘Civil War: II.’ /s/ Bill]

NATIONAL SECURITY / POLITICS

Could China Win a War with the U.S. Over Taiwan?

Posted Friday, May 7, 2021   |   By AMAC Newsline   |  6 Comments Share Tweet Email

AMAC Exclusive by Daniel Roman

While the new Biden team at the Pentagon is preoccupied with bringing the “woke” revolution to the U.S. Military, China is taking full advantage of the distraction of America’s frivolous political class. If senior Biden appointees at the Pentagon were properly focused on preventing an actual war rather than on waging a left-wing culture war, they might take a moment to register the appropriate sense of alarm about the situation with Taiwan. Here is the briefing the Biden team needs to be receiving on what I have termed “the most dangerous place on Earth.”

The bottom line: the U.S. may be stumbling into war in the Taiwan Strait–and despite our overwhelmingly military advantage in terms of the capability of our Armed Forces, in such a conflict, a disaster for America could be more likely than most Americans would believe.

As I argued in the first installment of this series, for the Chinese Communist Party, the question of retaking Taiwan is not a matter of if–it’s a question of how and when.  Taiwan’s centrality to the semiconductor trade makes it a linchpin of global supply chains. But more importantly, the continued existence of a rival “Chinese” regime in Taipei not only calls into question the legitimacy of the CCP government in Beijing to speak for all of China; it also raises doubts about just how impressive the record of the CCP has been in turning China into a great power.

In the CCP’s determination to retake Taiwan, War has been an option contemplated since 1949, and Beijing has threatened to resort to just such methods at least three times. Once in 1955, again in 1958, and most recently in 1996. To China, however, war comes in many forms. There is, of course, the military element, and here China’s buildup is posing a threat that almost all American officials recognize.

Military strength can be assessed in two ways. First, in an absolute sense. Who has the greater destructive potential–, the more formidable aircraft, the more advanced weapon systems? The second is to consider which side is better equipped to accomplish a specific task.

There is no doubt that the United States maintains a vast technological superiority over the People’s Liberation Army forces. While the gap has closed in recent years–and quantity, as the saying goes, often has a quality of its own–when it comes to destructive potential on a global level, the United States is unequaled. This is especially true when it comes to the ability of each side to inflict damage on the other’s homeland. The United States possesses the ability to not just hit targets anywhere in China, thereby paralyzing China’s transportation and communications infrastructure, but naval and air superiority on a global level which could cripple the Chinese economy.

While China might be able to compete with the U.S. Navy in the South China Sea, there is little the Chinese could do to challenge American dominance in the Middle East or the Americas in the event of a conflict. As such, Beijing could expect the U.S. to be able to close the Panama Canal, the Suez, and the Straits of Hormuz and Malacca to Chinese shipping. As for the ability to strike each other’s homelands, while China can hit American targets with nuclear weapons, nuclear weapons generally do not factor into conflicts with conventional geopolitical objectives.

While all of these advantages would spell doom for China in a prospective World War III against the United States, the important thing to understand is that China’s leaders have no intention of fighting a World War III against America. At least not for the foreseeable future, and preferably not ever if it can be avoided. China has a limited objective, namely asserting its sovereignty over Taiwan, and the playing field for that conflict is very different. While the United States, in theory, could use all of the means at its disposal to destroy China in order to stop China from taking Taiwan, this is highly unlikely in practice, in the same way, that the United States would never have resorted to World War III to stop a Soviet Invasion of Poland in 1981 to crush Solidarity, or during the Cold War to remove Tito from Yugoslavia.

For one thing, virtually all of the vital strategic chokepoints mentioned above exist on the sovereign territory of countries other than either China or the United States. The Suez Canal belongs, as we have so recently been reminded, to Egypt. The Straits of Hormuz separate the Gulf states from Iran. The Straits of Malacca, Singapore, Malaysia, and Indonesia. For the United States to blockade any of these sea routes without the consent of the countries involved would be an act of war, and doubly so if it involved seizing neutral shipping.

This is where the limited nature of Chinese objectives and the Chinese propaganda campaign (which I wrote about here) will come into play.  While nations such as Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia are U.S. allies, and might if it was a choice between Chinese world domination and a continuation of the status quo, decide to align with America, they certainly have no reason to destroy their economies, their relations with one of their greatest investors, and risk becoming warzones to involve themselves in what is at most a Sino-American affair, and at worst an internal Chinese one–the status of Taiwan. All of these nations recognize the PRC as the sovereign government over all of China, including Taiwan, and many have dubious democratic records of their own.

In the event of conflict over the Taiwan strait, therefore, America’s overwhelming superiority on a global level would quickly be neutralized by the rapid and firm declarations of neutrality that would emanate from virtually every government on the entire globe. If the U.S. were to nevertheless try to turn the situation into a global conflict (where America has the advantage), it would likely trigger a global economic crisis and create enormous pressure from more or less the entire world to settle the conflict. “Settling” would almost certainly be Beijing’s terms.

Fundamentally, therefore, any military conflict over Taiwan will have to be won or lost in the Taiwan strait. The Communist government in Beijing grasps this, and its strategy is heavily focused not on winning a global war but on winning a war along the coast. Here, again, the People’s Liberation Army would face a logistical challenge invading Taiwan, which, after all, is an island. Amphibious landings are notoriously risky, and the straits are not known for the calmness of their waters. Again, however, Beijing does not actually need to invade Taiwan to “defeat” the United States. It merely needs to destroy the American forces between Taiwan and the mainland.

In practice, that would mean defeating the U.S. 7^th Fleet, based in Yokosuka, Japan, a formidable force including five aircraft carriers. This would be no easy task on the high seas, where even the rapidly expanded Chinese Navy would stand little chance. That is why the battle would not be fought on the high seas but rather near the coast of the Chinese province of Fujian. As a consequence, American naval forces would be faced with confronting Chinese land-based forces.

This would not be a fair fight. U.S. weapon systems are vastly more advanced, but military history teaches us that periods pass in which either defense or offense are more advantageous given the technology available. In World War I, the onset of the machine gun and artillery provided the defense with an overwhelming advantage which was only overturned with the development of airpower and motorized transport in the Second World War. In the modern era, the rise of precision-guided missiles ensures that naval combat (and air combat for that matter) is almost entirely carried out at long-range by missile exchanges. This lesson was demonstrated during the Falklands war, where a mere four French Exocet missiles in the hands of the Argentine Navy inflicted virtually all of the losses the Royal Navy suffered. They were enough to knock a carrier out of action. Argentina had a mere 7 in total. Had Buenos Aires possessed 70, much less 700, it is hard to see how much would have been left of the Royal Navy.

China has invested heavily in anti-ship missiles. While the U.S. Navy’s anti-missile countermeasures are generations more advanced than the almost non-existent British defenses in 1982, there is a fundamental problem, as the National Interest points out. It is much cheaper and easier to build land-based anti-ship missiles than it is to build ships, and it is far easier to resupply land-based launchers in one’s own territory than it is to resupply anti-missile systems onboard ships at sea. The Defense Department estimated in 2019 that the PRC had as many as 1,500 super-sonic mid-range anti-ship missiles, noting that “China’s broad range of ASCMs and launch platforms as well as submarine-launched torpedoes and naval mines allow the [Chinese Navy] to create an increasingly lethal, multiaccess threat against an adversary approaching Chinese waters and operating areas.” There is a real possibility that with current trends, China will, to put it bluntly, be able to shoot the U.S. Navy out of anti-missile ammunition, at which point our fleet would be sitting ducks.

There are, of course, ways of countering these advantages. The easiest would be for the U.S. military to destroy Chinese launchers on the ground. But here, politics will rear its ugly head. While militarily sensible if not vital, launching strikes on Chinese weapon systems on the soil of the Chinese mainland before they open fire would be politically impossible. It would be an act of war and aggression. As such, American military countermeasures will be limited by the need to allow the PRC to strike first.

Furthermore, while the Chinese will be able to operate from both land and sea, American forces will likely find their options limited. South Korea is unlikely to wish for its territory to be used for attacks on Chinese targets, not least out of fear of retaliation either directly or politically after any conflict. Even the attitude of Japan will be uncertain. While a U.S. ally, Japan’s economic lifelines run through the sea lanes along China’s coast. Becoming a combatant would make Japanese shipping vessels fair game, and unlike U.S. warships, Japanese merchantmen lack any missile defense systems. It would not be a shock if a Japanese government suddenly discovered “constitutional” obstacles to allowing American forces based in Japan to operate in defense of Taiwan, obstacles that would be unable to be resolved without a meeting of the Diet, which would be conveniently indisposed for unclear reasons. The United States Navy might find itself effectively evicted from its major regional bases (outside of Guam) on day one of any conflict, if not before.

The only territory which would likely not have objections to American forces operating against China would be Taiwan itself, but here the diplomatic and political circumstances make basing American forces on the island prior to the outbreak of fighting difficult if not impossible.

It is worth noting that these circumstances combine to create a “no-lose” situation for China. If China were to engage in this sort of conflict, the sole goal would be to defeat or destroy the U.S. 7^th Fleet. If China were to fail, the political and economic interests of both regional powers and major states in Europe, the Middle East, and Latin America would ensure that the United States would come under enormous pressure to accept a cease-fire rather than taking the war to the Chinese mainland. This would leave China free to try again at a future date while using economic and political leverage to mitigate any diplomatic fallout. The U.S. would have no plan for any sort of follow-up other than merely surviving.

By contrast, if China were to eliminate the 7^th Fleet, the incentives that would lead Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, and other regional states to seek neutrality in the initial conflict would shift to causing them to seek accommodation with Beijing. They would step in to mediate so as to avert a “total” collapse of the American position in the region, most likely by offering a settlement whereby Taiwan would accept Chinese sovereignty and Beijing would “allow” an autonomous government to continue. Beijing would have every reason to offer such a settlement in the circumstances. Having destroyed the U.S. 7^th Fleet in the Taiwan Strait, Beijing would have demonstrated to the Taiwanese that the PRC could invade whenever it chose. Therefore there would no longer be a need to actually do so in order to achieve the desired collaboration. Beijing would, of course, demand Taiwan’s total disarmament and an agreement that Taipei would conduct future foreign relations solely through Beijing. Through such “generosity”, the CCP could ensure that Taiwan could be gobbled up at any convenient moment in the future while also reassuring “former” American allies in the region and allowing a defeated Washington to save face. It is hard to see how an American administration could resist pressure to accept such terms.

It is this “win-win” or at least a “win-not lose” situation for China that makes the position of Taiwan so dangerous. While the United States could easily defeat China in World War III, the dynamics of any conflict over Taiwan will be very different. In fact, they risk conspiring to ensure that the United States would be forced to fight any such conflict with one, if not both, hands tied behind its back.

You Have to Read This Letter

A New York father pulls his daughter out of Brearley with a message to the whole school. Is the dam starting to break?

Bari WeissApr 161,091534

I was planning to publish a roundup today of the many thoughtful responses to Paul Rossi’s essay. I’m going to save that post for Sunday, because I was just sent this letter that has my jaw on the floor. It was written by a Brearley parent named Andrew Gutmann.

If you don’t know about Brearley, it’s a private all-girls school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan. It costs $54,000 a year and prospective families apparently have to take an “anti-racism pledge” to be considered for admission. (In the course of my reporting for this piece I spoke to a few Brearley parents.)

Gutmann chose to pull his daughter, who has been in the school since kindergarten, and sent this missive to all 600 or so families in the school earlier this week. Among the lines:

If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution.

I’m pasting the whole thing below.

Meantime, I’m going to ask Andrew Gutmann to join Paul Rossi and me for our subscriber-only conversation this coming Tuesday night. I hope he’ll join. Details about that event will be in Sunday’s post.

I promise: this newsletter won’t be exclusively about education. But my gosh is it a wild right story to follow right now. . .

See you Sunday.

---

April 13, 2021 

Dear Fellow Brearley Parents, 

Our family recently made the decision not to reenroll our daughter at Brearley for the 2021-22 school year. She has been at Brearley for seven years, beginning in kindergarten. In short, we no longer believe that Brearley’s administration and Board of Trustees have any of our children’s best interests at heart. Moreover, we no longer have confidence that our daughter will receive the quality of education necessary to further her development into a critically thinking, responsible, enlightened, and civic minded adult. I write to you, as a fellow parent, to share our reasons for leaving the Brearley community but also to urge you to act before the damage to the school, to its community, and to your own child’s education is irreparable. 

It cannot be stated strongly enough that Brearley’s obsession with race must stop. It should be abundantly clear to any thinking parent that Brearley has completely lost its way. The administration and the Board of Trustees have displayed a cowardly and appalling lack of leadership by appeasing an anti-intellectual, illiberal mob, and then allowing the school to be captured by that same mob. What follows are my own personal views on Brearley’s antiracism initiatives, but these are just a handful of the criticisms that I know other parents have expressed. 

I object to the view that I should be judged by the color of my skin. I cannot tolerate a school that not only judges my daughter by the color of her skin, but encourages and instructs her to prejudge others by theirs. By viewing every element of education, every aspect of history, and every facet of society through the lens of skin color and race, we are desecrating the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and utterly violating the movement for which such civil rights leaders believed, fought, and died. 

I object to the charge of systemic racism in this country, and at our school. Systemic racism, properly understood, is segregated schools and separate lunch counters. It is the interning of Japanese and the exterminating of Jews. Systemic racism is unequivocally not a small number of isolated incidences over a period of decades. Ask any girl, of any race, if they have ever experienced insults from friends, have ever felt slighted by teachers or have ever suffered the occasional injustice from a school at which they have spent up to 13 years of their life, and you are bound to hear grievances, some petty, some not. We have not had systemic racism against Blacks in this country since the civil rights reforms of the 1960s, a period of more than 50 years. To state otherwise is a flat-out misrepresentation of our country’s history and adds no understanding to any of today’s societal issues. If anything, longstanding and widespread policies such as affirmative action, point in precisely the opposite direction. 

I object to a definition of systemic racism, apparently supported by Brearley, that any educational, professional, or societal outcome where Blacks are underrepresented is prima facie evidence of the aforementioned systemic racism, or of white supremacy and oppression. Facile and unsupported beliefs such as these are the polar opposite to the intellectual and scientific truth for which Brearley claims to stand. Furthermore, I call bullshit on Brearley’s oft-stated assertion that the school welcomes and encourages the truly difficult and uncomfortable conversations regarding race and the roots of racial discrepancies. 

I object to the idea that Blacks are unable to succeed in this country without aid from government or from whites. Brearley, by adopting critical race theory, is advocating the abhorrent viewpoint that Blacks should forever be regarded as helpless victims, and are incapable of success regardless of their skills, talents, or hard work. What Brearley is teaching our children is precisely the true and correct definition of racism. 

I object to mandatory anti-racism training for parents, especially when presented by the rent-seeking charlatans of Pollyanna. These sessions, in both their content and delivery, are so sophomoric and simplistic, so unsophisticated and inane, that I would be embarrassed if they were taught to Brearley kindergarteners. They are an insult to parents and unbecoming of any educational institution, let alone one of Brearley’s caliber. 

I object to Brearley’s vacuous, inappropriate, and fanatical use of words such as “equity,” “diversity” and “inclusiveness.” If Brearley’s administration was truly concerned about so-called “equity,” it would be discussing the cessation of admissions preferences for legacies, siblings, and those families with especially deep pockets. If the administration was genuinely serious about “diversity,” it would not insist on the indoctrination of its students, and their families, to a single mindset, most reminiscent of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Instead, the school would foster an environment of intellectual openness and freedom of thought. And if Brearley really cared about “inclusiveness,” the school would return to the concepts encapsulated in the motto “One Brearley,” instead of teaching the extraordinarily divisive idea that there are only, and always, two groups in this country: victims and oppressors. 

l object to Brearley’s advocacy for groups and movements such as Black Lives Matter, a Marxist, anti family, heterophobic, anti-Asian and anti-Semitic organization that neither speaks for the majority of the Black community in this country, nor in any way, shape or form, represents their best interests. 

I object to, as we have been told time and time again over the past year, that the school’s first priority is the safety of our children. For goodness sake, Brearley is a school, not a hospital! The number one priority of a school has always been, and always will be, education. Brearley’s misguided priorities exemplify both the safety culture and “cover-your-ass” culture that together have proved so toxic to our society and have so damaged the mental health and resiliency of two generations of children, and counting. 

I object to the gutting of the history, civics, and classical literature curriculums. I object to the censorship of books that have been taught for generations because they contain dated language potentially offensive to the thin-skinned and hypersensitive (something that has already happened in my daughter’s 4th grade class). I object to the lowering of standards for the admission of students and for the hiring of teachers. I object to the erosion of rigor in classwork and the escalation of grade inflation. Any parent with eyes open can foresee these inevitabilities should antiracism initiatives be allowed to persist. 

We have today in our country, from both political parties, and at all levels of government, the most unwise and unvirtuous leaders in our nation’s history. Schools like Brearley are supposed to be the training grounds for those leaders. Our nation will not survive a generation of leadership even more poorly educated than we have now, nor will we survive a generation of students taught to hate its own country and despise its history. 

Lastly, I object, with as strong a sentiment as possible, that Brearley has begun to teach what to think, instead of how to think. I object that the school is now fostering an environment where our daughters, and our daughters’ teachers, are afraid to speak their minds in class for fear of “consequences.” I object that Brearley is trying to usurp the role of parents in teaching morality, and bullying parents to adopt that false morality at home. I object that Brearley is fostering a divisive community where families of different races, which until recently were part of the same community, are now segregated into two. These are the reasons why we can no longer send our daughter to Brearley. 

Over the past several months, I have personally spoken to many Brearley parents as well as parents of children at peer institutions. It is abundantly clear that the majority of parents believe that Brearley’s antiracism policies are misguided, divisive, counterproductive and cancerous. Many believe, as I do, that these policies will ultimately destroy what was until recently, a wonderful educational institution. But as I am sure will come as no surprise to you, given the insidious cancel culture that has of late permeated our society, most parents are too fearful to speak up. 

But speak up you must. There is strength in numbers and I assure you, the numbers are there. Contact the administration and the Board of Trustees and demand an end to the destructive and anti-intellectual claptrap known as antiracism. And if changes are not forthcoming then demand new leadership. For the sake of our community, our city, our country and most of all, our children, silence is no longer an option. 

Respectfully,

Andrew Gutmann

The midnight ride of Paul ReverePaul Revere, a renowned silversmith, is better remembered as a folk hero of the American Revolution who this night in 1775 made a dramatic ride on horseback to warn Boston-area residents of an imminent attack by British troops.© SuperStock

Skip to main content

Home | Wire | The Interesting Case of the Zaïre—the Question MMT Cannot Answer

The Interesting Case of the Zaïre—the Question MMT Cannot Answer

04/16/2021Eric Nies

The zaïre lived an interesting life.

The zaïre was the basic unit of currency for the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Zaire (it’s back to the Democratic Republic of the Congo; I’ll just call it Zaire for ease) from 1967 until 1997. Seventy-three of the 79 series of zaïre banknotes featured Ziarian dictator, CIA stooge, and world champion kleptocrat Joseph-Desire Mobuto.

For its first two decades, the zaïre was surprisingly stable as far as Sub-Saharan currencies go. Between 1967 and 1987, the inflation vis-à-vis the dollar was only 98 percent. But then, things took a turn.

The Zairian economy had managed to stay afloat during decades of kleptomania, nepotism, and military spending by Mobuto and his cronies due to Western Aid and high prices for the various minerals mined in the Eastern Congo basin. Beginning around 1990, the combination of the collapse of the Soviet Bloc, falling copper prices, and deeper administrative ineptitude buffeted the economy.

As Gerard Prunier, French journalist and author of the excellent Africa’s World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making of a Continental Catastrophe, explains:

From sickly, the Ziarian economy turned terminal…. Because imports remained at a fairly high level for some time while exports declined, the external debt had risen to $12.8 billion by 1996, representing 233 percent of GDP, or 924 percent of export capacity …

Perhaps the most preoccupying effect of this collapse was the quasi-disappearance of the monetary system. With inflation rate that the IMF calculated at an average of 2,000 percent during the 1900s, prices shot up in an insane way.

The Zairian consumer price index moved from 100 in 1990 to 4,130 in 1992 to just under 2,000,000 in 1993. Prunier continues:

The government started to print money as fast as it could, simply to keep a certain amount of fiduciary currency irrigating the economy. Bills were printed in ever higher denominations and put into circulation as fast as possible, and their rapidly shrinking real purchasing value would then wipe them off the market in a way that make even the German hyperinflation of the 1920s look mild In December 1992 the system finally imploded: the Z 5 million bill was refused by everybody and had a zero life span. The government then tried to force it through by paying soldiers’ salaries [with the inflated bills] but the army rioted when its money was refused in the shops.

So far it reads like one of the many hyperinflations throughout history. But then things get interesting. Mobuto, in a panic, demonetized the zaïre and issued the new zaïre, with an initial exchange rate of 1 new zaïre = 3,000,000 old zaïre.

A nation issuing new currency to attempt to staunch an inflationary hemorrhage is nothing new; Brazil did the same thing in the 1990s. However, the new zaïre suffered from the same hyperinflative tendencies as its predecessor except that in certain areas of Zaire the old zaïre resurfaced and began to be used again as a medium of exchange. For instance,

Kasai refused the new currency and kept using the old one, which regained a certain value simply by not being printed anymore.

In other words, even though the government and its central bank ruled that the old zaïre was without value and the full faith and credit of the Zairian government backed the new zaïre, the only currency with any value was the old zaïre—and the value had nothing to do with any fiat issued by the government, but instead the understanding of a sector of the population that because the old zaïre was no longer being printed, it could act as a reasonably safe store of value.

Finally, by 1994, the financial sector was operating entirely with foreign currencies. Meanwhile, Prunier reports,

As for the Congolese population … its tax burden increased out of all proportion, reaching a punishing rate of 7.5 percent of GNP outside the oil and mining levies.

The case of the zaïre provides strong anecdotal evidence discounting the fiat currency-obsessed Modern Monetary Theory (“MMT”).

MMT, which is growing in popularity, takes to the logical extreme the concept of fiat money, even to the point that proponents have argued government-issued currency is not subject to market forces and can be issued indefinitely. A fundamental aspect of MMT is the tenet that a central bank can always control inflation by pulling its own fiat currency from circulation by taxation. Thus, proponents such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and former Bernie Sanders advisor Stephanie Kelton claim neither inflation nor budget deficits are a significant concern.

MMT proponents have attempted to contest the arguments by such economists as Larry Summers that MMT is simply a recipe for hyperinflation by pointing out that a primary focus of MMT is keeping inflation in check by taxation (to reduce “excess demand”) and fiscal—as opposed to monetary—policy (such as an eternal zero Fed discount rate). But this is exactly where the zaïre is so relevant.

A basic presumption of MMT is that the government can keep control of “its” money—that through any number of tools, it can control inflation fiscally and thus print whatever money it needs for the here and now without the classical economic concern about hyperinflation. But fiat currency (all currency actually) only has value if it is perceived to have value, and a central bank cannot switch that subjective valuation on and off at will. Consider again what happened in Zaire:

(1) Due to internal and external forces, the corrupt government ran out of money and it turned on the presses. This was not due to the evil corporate bogeyman some MMT proponents blame, but simple increase in the money supply.

(2) Inflation and then hyperinflation hit to the point that the zaïre was virtually useless. The government’s attempt to prop up the zaïre, literally at gunpoint, failed as did a “punishing rate” of taxation—which MMT proponents argue is a primary tool to stop inflation.

(3) The central bank issued the new new zaïre and backed it while demonetizing the old zaïre. However, the government fiat meant nothing to the populace, who deemed the new zaïre worthless.

(4) Meanwhile, the demonetized zaïre, having been left for dead, was suddenly resurrected. There is no evidence I can find of any centralizing or guiding effort behind the choice of some Zairians to begin using the old zaïre again; rather, it appears to have been a spontaneous market reaction and people realized the presses had stopped, and with it, inflation.

The question MMT simply cannot answer is what happens when, due to monetary and fiscal gymnastics, the consumer simply stops trusting or using the currency. The Zairian central bank could not tax the populace enough to reduce “aggregate demand,” and its attempts to force a new currency on the populace immediately failed. Meanwhile, the older currency, which the government had specifically disavowed, was given value by the people—at least for a while. Under MMT tenets, this should not have happened; indeed, it should be impossible. And yet, it happened all the same.

Originally published at Disinthrallment. 

Author:

Eric Nies

Eric John Nies is an attorney who lives in the Mountain West. He enjoys history, Korean cinema, and progressive rock. He writes for Disinthrallment and Beneath the Lamp.

Thomas Sowell grew up in Harlem, served in the Marine Corps during the Korean War.. graduated Magna Cum Laude from Harvard, Masters from Columbia U…Economist,

Social Theorist, Philosopher, Author…Senior Fellow. Hoover Institution, Stanford University… National Humanities Medal… Francis Boyer Award… 



   
   
   

   
   
   
   

   
   
   

   
   

   
   
   

   
   
   


MANY COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ARE OPENLY OPPOSED TO PERMITTING MR. SOWELL TO LECTURE THEIR STUDENTS AND FACULTY.

I WONDER WHY ?????

A new financial system aka the quantum financial system QFS

January 30, 2021inBlog, Dinar Guru, Dinar News, USA, World

https://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-5797073542730135&output=html&h=280&slotname=1725182775&adk=3339354019&adf=2589558187&pi=t.ma~as.1725182775&w=610&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1616020154&rafmt=1&psa=1&format=610×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&flash=0&fwr=0&fwrattr=true&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&dt=1616020160163&bpp=3&bdt=188&idt=302&shv=r20210316&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Da49ee8c9f3aa9646-22afc5bcebc600bf%3AT%3D1616020125%3ART%3D1616020125%3AS%3DALNI_MbHUn6mqSe1eQYGb0DJoZ7-Pvw-FQ&prev_fmts=0x0%2C305x250%2C0x0%2C728x90&nras=1&correlator=3558019581315&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=1036039418.1616020130&ga_sid=1616020160&ga_hid=991200720&ga_fc=0&u_tz=-360&u_his=3&u_java=0&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=824&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=455&ady=791&biw=1519&bih=722&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=31060288%2C44739387&oid=3&pvsid=282741076996334&pem=111&wsm=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C824%2C1536%2C722&vis=1&rsz=%7Co%7CEebr%7C&abl=NS&pfx=0&fu=8320&bc=31&ifi=4&uci=a!4&btvi=2&fsb=1&xpc=824jdQYQKw&p=https%3A//dinartimes.com&dtd=310What is quantum financial system QFS?

QFS literal meaning is Quantum Financial System, which is an advanced financial system launched to eradicate the cabal and banksters monopoly on monetary system and for that purpose, a system comprises of Artificial Intelligence and complex computer programs fully backed by banks is needed. Quantum Financial System would be a break through in the world of banking which lead to a new era of banking QFS will not be influenced by Government policies, rather it will be entirely backed by tangible assets like Gold, Platinum, Oil and will not be based upon mere piece of papers which have no evidentiary value.

QFS can be called the modern era Barter System in which you have to give valuable in order to receive valuable. The current world financial system is based on the principle in which your money is backed by debt which already been taken from you with high interest rates and in this way world economy is flowing which is serving only one purpose, filling pockets of handful families. There are chances that if the QFS will launch then all the indebted countries will be able to reimburse all the debts by exporting their natural minerals and resources. If we have a look at the current situation of Iraq then beneath the ice, we will come to know that due to massive debts of Iraq, it is quite tough for them to launch RV because a country simply cannot revalue its currency when it is in debt. Contrary to that if you repay all you are owing with interest then it is quite possible to enhance you exports which will revalue your currency. Iraq is a land which have Natural Oil worth trillions of Dollars and do you know folks that due to this only reason, Iraq is still on 5^th number in gold reserves despite of all odd. In the Iraqi Dinar community the gurus are of opinion that this is a pragmatic approach towards the RV of Iraqi Dinar.

QFS will Revalue recessive currencies

Initiation of QFS is essential for investors of Recessive currencies as the QFS is the only solution which will ascertain that these recessive currencies will be Revalued without influence of Dominant currencies. In the due process of QFS, the world economies will be entered into a new era which will distinctly opt for the barter system and the countries which are backed by enough natural valuable assets will have a certain opportunity to make their currency dominant in the Financial markets.

Another rumor which comes from the investment resource is that the China was the first to initiate the Quantum Financial System by initiating the Digital Currency Electronic Payment. As an investor of US Dollar my concern is regarding the future of US Dollar after the initiation of QFS.

QFS and its effects on US Dollarhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-5797073542730135&output=html&h=280&slotname=1725182775&adk=3008447721&adf=2577865446&pi=t.ma~as.1725182775&w=610&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1616020154&rafmt=1&psa=1&format=610×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&flash=0&fwr=0&fwrattr=true&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&dt=1616020160166&bpp=2&bdt=191&idt=338&shv=r20210316&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Da49ee8c9f3aa9646-22afc5bcebc600bf%3AT%3D1616020125%3ART%3D1616020125%3AS%3DALNI_MbHUn6mqSe1eQYGb0DJoZ7-Pvw-FQ&prev_fmts=0x0%2C305x250%2C0x0%2C728x90%2C610x280&nras=1&correlator=3558019581315&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=1036039418.1616020130&ga_sid=1616020160&ga_hid=991200720&ga_fc=0&u_tz=-360&u_his=3&u_java=0&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=824&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=455&ady=2103&biw=1519&bih=722&scr_x=0&scr_y=0&eid=31060288%2C44739387&oid=3&pvsid=282741076996334&pem=111&wsm=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C824%2C1536%2C722&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CEebr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=8320&bc=31&ifi=5&uci=a!5&btvi=3&fsb=1&xpc=9q5z2jp3Lp&p=https%3A//dinartimes.com&dtd=344

It is surprising that US Dollar index is rising with every passing week despite of this pandemic and is dominating over other major currencies like Yuan and Euro. The Iraqi Dinar can be benefited from the rising index of the US Dollar, if its economy would not be relying on the Oil and its economy would be stable. There are two major reasons of rising index of US Dollar. First is Federal Reserve as it is pushing trillions of Dollars into the financial system in order to enhance liquidity in the foreign financial markets and central banks to vanquish Yuan and securing the place for its greenback. Secondly the sanctions on Chinese products is starting to play its part in the demand of US Dollar.  

But as far as QFS concerns, QFS will certainly hit the US Dollar and will control its artificial fluctuations which only give benefits to the Wall Street giant Dollar investors who are accustomed to make millions from single investments by manipulating the US Dollar fluctuations.

China play in Digital Dominance

It is also important to look at the economic war between China and US on the Digital Currency Electronic Payment. Before the wave of Coronavirus, China has launched its first automated payment system formally named DECP which will be based on their currency Renminbi Yuan. The purpose of DECP was to enhance transactions outside China and bypassing the US transactional and financial system which is standing on the US Dollar. Now that the US has controlled the China economic and strictly laying down numerous restrictions on its trade and economy. The latest update is that Federal Reserve is working on digital dollar wallets which will be initially used for the stimulus package amount transfers as most US citizens do not have access to banks for cash deposits and withdrawals. But in the next stage it will be used for the international trade & transactions. All these signs are directing towards the QFS launch. While in this play US is dominating and US Dollar will remain a major player but our advice to all of our investment seekers and followers is that despite of all these strong grounds, US Dollar is still a piece of paper and we strongly urge you to transform your savings and assets into Valuable tangible assets like Gold, Platinum and Silver. The value of these assets has been undeniable since the beginning of times and will remain valued till the end of times.

Prophecies on QFShttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-5797073542730135&output=html&h=280&slotname=1725182775&adk=3008447721&adf=1829361778&pi=t.ma~as.1725182775&w=610&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1616020154&rafmt=1&psa=1&format=610×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&flash=0&fwr=0&fwrattr=true&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&adsid=ChEI8NHGggYQu-GA4KHv07_3ARIvAGUeza47rYSn8Y_pahFvpBs89ZeZh2pu7AfyL6RhznHeMh8P0W2_ejlDKWTmD7s&dt=1616020160168&bpp=2&bdt=193&idt=403&shv=r20210316&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Da49ee8c9f3aa9646-22afc5bcebc600bf%3AT%3D1616020125%3ART%3D1616020125%3AS%3DALNI_MbHUn6mqSe1eQYGb0DJoZ7-Pvw-FQ&prev_fmts=0x0%2C305x250%2C0x0%2C728x90%2C610x280%2C610x280%2C305x250%2C1519x722&nras=2&correlator=3558019581315&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=1036039418.1616020130&ga_sid=1616020160&ga_hid=991200720&ga_fc=0&u_tz=-360&u_his=3&u_java=0&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=824&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=455&ady=3307&biw=1519&bih=722&scr_x=0&scr_y=425&eid=31060288%2C44739387&oid=3&psts=AGkb-H-nupvTs9c9cPT785Ra6kQonZ2T7H19jZE7WDry_gdh6OSu60qa4PPi6ErmmyFT5RVNJjAyGIYAtA%2CAGkb-H9qk46yG_kBLOn0C2ZRef3dvettK41vODSAnQv3cM-rxC6MBB5ccvgA4P_o7aS6oZnWsmpGNTPKLs4&pvsid=282741076996334&pem=111&wsm=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C824%2C1536%2C722&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CEebr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=8320&bc=31&jar=2021-03-17-22&ifi=6&uci=a!6&btvi=5&fsb=1&xpc=XkTt0fXeqd&p=https%3A//dinartimes.com&dtd=2009

The battle between these two giant economies and both of them trying their best to dominate the digital currency is going towards a system which unintentionally make the world to roll towards gold backed assets. It will surely be operated on a system which will be control by none of the Governments and Cabal. In the technology of QFS, the AI will be the one to operate all the trades and transactions whether it will be of currency investments or intercontinental transactions between the countries. AI will act according to the balance of trades and will remain unbiased which is the major quality of QFS. From the last decade a US based economic think tank has stated

‘’IF THERE’S A POSSIBILITY TO CREATE SOME DIGITAL CURRENCY NOT TIED TO ANY DOMESTIC ECONOMY, THERE MIGHT BE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SOMEBODY TO FIGURE THAT OUT’’.

And this is the era which is surprisingly amending the ways to fulfil this prophecy sort of analyst.

QFS & Blockchain

Now if we discuss about the Quantum Financial System and its interrelation with Blockchain and future banking then we came to know that QFS is dealing in blockchain, shared ledgers and distributed ledger technologies, cryptocurrencies, virtual currencies and digital currencies. QFS is stored and operate on the satellite-based servers based on Quantum Computing. The reason is Quantum Computing is more secure and advance, because of its pattern of processing, the quantum computing uses two or more quantum states together to create another state by firing electrons through semiconductors using configurable pulse of light which results fastest state of speed. That’s why Quantum Computers store far more information requiring less energy and deliver more speed than current state computers.

Will QFS Revalue Iraqi Dinarhttps://googleads.g.doubleclick.net/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-5797073542730135&output=html&h=280&slotname=1725182775&adk=3008447721&adf=3323640976&pi=t.ma~as.1725182775&w=610&fwrn=4&fwrnh=100&lmt=1616020154&rafmt=1&psa=1&format=610×280&url=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&flash=0&fwr=0&fwrattr=true&rpe=1&resp_fmts=3&wgl=1&adsid=ChEI8NHGggYQu-GA4KHv07_3ARIvAGUeza47rYSn8Y_pahFvpBs89ZeZh2pu7AfyL6RhznHeMh8P0W2_ejlDKWTmD7s&dt=1616020160188&bpp=2&bdt=212&idt=410&shv=r20210316&cbv=r20190131&ptt=9&saldr=aa&abxe=1&cookie=ID%3Da49ee8c9f3aa9646-22afc5bcebc600bf%3AT%3D1616020125%3ART%3D1616020125%3AS%3DALNI_MbHUn6mqSe1eQYGb0DJoZ7-Pvw-FQ&prev_fmts=0x0%2C305x250%2C0x0%2C728x90%2C610x280%2C610x280%2C305x250%2C1519x722%2C610x280&nras=2&correlator=3558019581315&frm=20&pv=1&ga_vid=1036039418.1616020130&ga_sid=1616020160&ga_hid=991200720&ga_fc=0&u_tz=-360&u_his=3&u_java=0&u_h=864&u_w=1536&u_ah=824&u_aw=1536&u_cd=24&u_nplug=3&u_nmime=4&adx=455&ady=4357&biw=1519&bih=722&scr_x=0&scr_y=1470&eid=31060288%2C44739387&oid=3&psts=AGkb-H-nupvTs9c9cPT785Ra6kQonZ2T7H19jZE7WDry_gdh6OSu60qa4PPi6ErmmyFT5RVNJjAyGIYAtA%2CAGkb-H9qk46yG_kBLOn0C2ZRef3dvettK41vODSAnQv3cM-rxC6MBB5ccvgA4P_o7aS6oZnWsmpGNTPKLs4%2CAGkb-H9b92VNLrarC2ZoVSiCEls5F7eTYt9BEL-f9dOdE23yEvgftpvNsZz5djvsEtXxANczU945h8qQZyYSog%2CAGkb-H-xGVTkVh3u5qVbWJGavQLoUTkKh_X9KBQNOxuhwEDS5D-qCLIni3T1tbo_jiwHSVJqZVFY7VP9jRugXQ&pvsid=282741076996334&pem=111&wsm=1&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fdinartimes.com%2Fa-new-financial-system-aka-the-quantum-financial-system-qfs%2F&rx=0&eae=0&fc=1920&brdim=0%2C0%2C0%2C0%2C1536%2C0%2C1536%2C824%2C1536%2C722&vis=1&rsz=%7C%7CEebr%7C&abl=CS&pfx=0&fu=8320&bc=31&jar=2021-03-17-22&ifi=7&uci=a!7&btvi=6&fsb=1&xpc=0lihhysD9l&p=https%3A//dinartimes.com&dtd=63202

After the launch of QFS, the Gold backed era will emerge and will Revalue all the currencies which are in bottom state due to the debts. QFS will also impact global trade as it would alter the financial system of the world. The Iraqi Dinar Gurus are of the opinion that RV will be launch as soon as QFS will take over because Iraq will be able to stabilize its economy by increasing the volume of it exports.

When Wise People Speak..we should listen!

Church Ladies With Typewriters

They’re Back!  Those wonderful Church Bulletins!  Thank God for the church ladies with typewriters.  These sentences actually appeared in church bulletins or were announced at church services:   
————————–

The Fasting & Prayer Conference includes meals. 
————————–     

Scouts are saving aluminum cans, bottles and other items to be recycled Proceeds will be used to cripple children. 
————————–

The sermon this morning: ‘Jesus Walks on the Water.  ‘The sermon tonight: ‘Searching for Jesus.’ 
————————– 
 
Ladies, don’t forget the rummage sale.  It’s a chance to get rid of those things not worth keeping around the house.  Bring your husbands.
————————–
  
Don’t let worry kill you off – let the Church help. 
————————– 
 
Miss Charlene Mason sang ‘I will not pass this way again,’ giving obvious pleasure to the congregation. 
————————– 
 
For those of you who have children and don’t know it, we have a nursery downstairs. 
————————– 
 
Next Thursday there will be try-outs for the choir.  They need all the help they can get.
————————– 
 
Irving Benson and Jessie Carter were married on October 24 in the church.  So ends a friendship that began in their school days. 
————————– 
 
A bean supper will be held on Tuesday evening in the church hall. Music will follow. 
————————– 
 
At the evening service tonight, the sermon topic will be ‘What Is Hell?’  Come early and listen to our choir practice.
————————–
  
Eight new choir robes are currently needed due to the addition of several new members and to the deterioration of some older ones.
————————– 
  
Please place your donation in the envelope along with the deceased person you want remembered.
————————– 
 
The church will host an evening of fine dining, super entertainment and gracious hostility. 
————————–
  
Pot-luck supper Sunday at 5:00 PM – prayer and medication to follow.
————————– 
 
The ladies of the Church have cast off clothing of every kind.  They may be seen in the basement on Friday afternoon. 
————————– 
 
This evening at 7 PM there will be a hymn singing in the park across from the Church.  Bring a blanket and come prepared to sin. 
————————– 
 
The pastor would appreciate it if the ladies of the Congregation would lend him their electric girdles for the pancake breakfast next Sunday. 
————————– 
 
Low Self Esteem Support Group will meet Thursday at 7 PM.  Please use the back door. 
————————–
  
The eighth-graders will be presenting Shakespeare’s Hamlet in the Church basement Friday at 7 PM.  The congregation is invited to attend this tragedy.
————————– 
 
Weight Watchers will meet at 7 PM at the First Presbyterian Church.  Please use large double door at the side entrance. 
————————–
And this one just about sums them all up

The Associate Minister unveiled the church’s new campaign slogan last Sunday: ‘I Upped My Pledge – Up Yours.’

————————–

Big Tech, the Maine Stream Media, and Socialist Democrats said that Biden won the election…fair and square, however the gloating Newsweek Magazine article outlined how Voter Fraud won.

In addition 74 million Republicans and 36% of Democrats believe that Voter Fraud was perpetrated with Dominion Voting Machines in the 2020 election.  This experiment that was videoed was an attempt to prove or disprove that the allegation that the Dominion Voting Machines did not accurately count the voters’ ballots in the 2020 election.

In this video, a test was conducted to check the validity of the votes counted and tabulated by a Dominion Voting Machine.  Paper ballots were marked yes or no by the 12 voters with an ink pen, then the ballots were inserted into a Dominion Voting Machine to be counted; the votes counted was dramatically incorrect.  One of the voters got so upset at the Voter Fraud that she broke down and cried, and said election results are not true. The inaccurate tabulation of voters ballots by Dominion Voting Machines have obviously been going on for some time, even before the 2020 election.  State election officials are either not doing their jobs, or are intentionally manipulating the count of voter’s ballots, affecting the results of elections (local, county, state, and national elections).

Judge Releases Dominion Audit Report: System ‘Designed’ to ‘Create Systemic Fraud’ | Neon Nettle

In 2017, Congress removed the Home Office Deduction unless you are a business owner. See below for the excerpt, p 35, from The Wall Street Journal‘s 2021 Tax Guide. Available to WSJ+ Members at http://www.wsjplus.com/taxguide .

, Congress disallowed many miscellaneous deductions or imposed new limits on them. These changes generally expire at the end of 2025. As a result, employees can’t deduct home-office expenses for 2020—a benefit that might have been useful to millions of filers working at home during the pandemic. (Home-office deductions can still be taken by business owners.) However, employers can receive a tax benefit from reimbursing workers for a wide range of costs they incurred due to the pandemic. If a firm reimburses its staffers for, say, office equipment or faster internet they need for their work, the company can likely deduct the costs on its own tax return for 2020. Other miscellaneous deductions repealed until 2026 include write-offs for unreimbursed expenses for employee travel, meals, and entertainment; union dues; safe-deposit box fees; tax-preparation fees; and subscriptions, among others. Also suspended is the deduction for investment-advisory fees. This change affects investors who pay fees for advice based on a percentage of their assets, including many with tax-efficient separately managed accounts. It can also hit investors in hedge funds or other funds structured as partnerships, if they owe tax on profits before hefty fees are deducted. Under prior law, many taxpayers found the miscellaneous-expenses deduction hard to qualify for, because total eligible expenses had to exceed 2% of adjusted gross income. Also on Schedule A, lawmakers curtailed the deduction for most casualty and theft losses other than from federally declared disasters. Some other itemized deductions are still allowed, such as for certain gambling losses. They are listed in the instructions for Schedule A. Elsewhere on the return, Congress ended the deduction for moving expenses by taxpayers who aren’t in the military. However, educators can still deduct up to $250 of unreimbursed expenses for classroom supplies, even if they don’t itemize on Schedule A. OTHER DEDUCTIONS, SUCH AS FOR HOME OFFICES Taxpayers can’t deduct a range of expenses that were once allowed, such as a home office used by an employee working remotely during the pandemic 36.

In keeping with my distaste of politicians constantly wasting my money, putting us out of work, and constantly lying and thieving for their own and their bubbas’ benefits, I am wondering if these aren’t good ideas:

The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) allows for the deduction of the expenses for maintaining a home office. Normally, you would have to meet the full criteria of a separate room/space that includes a door that closes and certain other specificities that show that this space is a true office and not just a dodge.

However, with so many businesses being required by the politicians mishandling government and the pandemic shut downs, certain of those requirements cannot be met, e.g., such as putting an office in a spare or even the master, bedroom. Still, the number of households who have had to convert home space to office space, and to buy office equipment or upgrade home-office equipment, is in the tens of millions and since this change was not intended by the employee, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should have to make allowances for these changes. It may not, but that can be litigated and any honest judge will agree to the deduction.

Another concern that has come to mind, is that of just compensation. The U.S. Constitution requires that when government takes something from a citizen, it must reciprocate with just compensation. A federal lawsuit requiring both the Feds and the States that have forced us home with executive orders may be filed requesting damages that include the psychological, i.e., pain & suffering, as well as the aspect of ‘taking’ of our homes and businesses without just compensation.

There is also the legal theory of scope of employment. that when behavior is outside their scope of employment (or, scope of authority, think Cuomo and Newsom), the employee is held personally accountable for his actions. Cuomo certainly was acting outside of his scope of employment when he altered the statistics which showed that his executive order forcing COVID positive elders back into nursing homes was responsible for thousands of deaths, thus opening him up for civil wrongful death actions that would include punitive damages. Considering that the honest reporting shows that he did that in order to help the NY Hospital Association avoid filling their beds with lower paying Medicare and Medicaid recipients and not to help his citizenry, certainly outside his scope of authority, he should now be held personally liable.

Just a few thoughts that may interest you.